@divegeester saidDo you think you demanding answers from people who clearly don't want to talk to you because of past abuse is pleasant discussion?
Why don’t you contribute to these discussions instead of trying to be a dog in a manger with your childish trolling?
23 Nov 23
@fmf saidWow, literal smoochies.
divegeester's mindmap, behaviour, and integrity is chalk-and-cheese different to KellyJays' mindmap, behaviour, and integrity. divegeester has the courage of his convictions. KellyJay, as a contributor to a debate and discussion forum, is cowardly, disingenuous, and inarticluate. The same cannot be said for divegeester. So there is no irony at all.
Do you honestly think the things you write here are unbiased integrity? Next you'll be telling me that he is the epitome of principle.
@divegeester saidNo one is enjoying YOUR "contribution", mister.
Why don’t you contribute to these discussions instead of trying to be a dog in a manger with your childish trolling?
23 Nov 23
@suzianne saidWhen a poster of your low calibre and lamentable posting record questions my integrity and principles, I can assure you, I don't give two hoots.
Do you honestly think the things you write here are unbiased integrity? Next you'll be telling me that he is the epitome of principle.
24 Nov 23
@kellyjay saidAn interesting term I heard in this link, "Luciferian crime" fits many transgressions.
https://youtu.be/sfI2se3O80Q
Both of these guys can get very deep, listening to them talk to one another is a treat. The topics are wide and varied.
25 Nov 23
@kellyjay saidUnfortunately, it presupposes that there are crimes that are somehow perpetrated or influenced by a supernatural being called "Lucifer".
An interesting term I heard in this link, "Luciferian crime" fits many transgressions.
So it may well be "an interesting term" when you are engaged in preaching to a choir that already believes that Satan, Lucifer, Beelzebub, Mephistopheles, and Iblis are the names of an anthropomorphized figure from ancient Hebrew folklore who actually exists.
If it's Peterson who's using it then, bearing in mind he is an atheist grifter, I'd hazard a guess that he is simply hoping to make money from Christians as he peddles his various grists from his various mills in the far-right podcast-sphere.
@FMF
It's a bore listening to bobble heads debate, in my opinion.
It is enough of a springboard for me here in this forum, which is becoming an increasingly egregious a task year by year.
I enjoy debating about stuff, but I'm less inclined as time goes by to engage when the topic becomes the person instead of the topic matter.
@suzianne saidI couldn’t care less wether you talk to me or not Suzianne.
Do you think you demanding answers from people who clearly don't want to talk to you because of past abuse is pleasant discussion?
The point I made was in observation of your inability to contribute anything meaningful to this or most other threads outside your partisan comfort zone in the debates forum.
26 Nov 23
@josephw saidwhen the topic becomes the person
I enjoy debating about stuff, but I'm less inclined as time goes by to engage when the topic becomes the person instead of the topic matter.
Well, the topic IS "the person": Jordan Peterson. It's in the thread title. I see him as, for the most part, a charlatan and grifter.
26 Nov 23
@josephw saidThis is more than a bit rich coming from you, of all people, a poster whose go-to "debating points" for years have been to accuse people you disagree with of suffering from mental illness and intellectual impairment ad nauseam.
I enjoy debating about stuff, but I'm less inclined as time goes by to engage when the topic becomes the person instead of the topic matter.
26 Nov 23
@divegeester saidDo you think you demanding answers from people who clearly don't want to talk to you because of past abuse is pleasant discussion?
I couldn’t care less wether you talk to me or not Suzianne.
The point I made was in observation of your inability to contribute anything meaningful to this or most other threads outside your partisan comfort zone in the debates forum.
@josephw saidYes, and I promise you even if you disengage they will continue because it isn't topics that matter they only really desire to go after people.
@FMF
It's a bore listening to bobble heads debate, in my opinion.
It is enough of a springboard for me here in this forum, which is becoming an increasingly egregious a task year by year.
I enjoy debating about stuff, but I'm less inclined as time goes by to engage when the topic becomes the person instead of the topic matter.