09 Mar 07
Originally posted by scottishinnzHic. Well, order arising from chaos is a venerable theme, all the way from the Sumerians to the chemistry lab. And all these accounts explain how order arises, but not why. It just does. How did the universe arise? Goddunit / Big Bang. Why? Dunno. Just did.
What was your question again?? Sorry, a few Stella Artois later...
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by Bosse de NageProbability really. It;s not (necessarily) that stable things arise more often, they just last longer. And, well, if they last longer AND can self-replicate....
Hic. Well, order arising from chaos is a venerable theme, all the way from the Sumerians to the chemistry lab. And all these accounts explain how order arises, but not why. It just does. How did the universe arise? Goddunit / Big Bang. Why? Dunno. Just did.
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by howardgeeIrrefutable evidence.
This is a sincere question for everybody out there who believes that God exists.
It is a thought experiment for you, so give it a good shot and please admit it if you cannot think of anything at all, as this is all a part of the exercise.
The question for you to try to answer is this:
"What evidence would be sufficient to persuade you that God does not exist?"
Way back in my early 20's, before I knew God, I developed a mental exercise I would go through each night as I fell asleep. You see, I was determined to know whether or not there was a God, so I began to think.
I thought, here I am in this material universe, in space. There are three things there. Matter, the space that matter exists in, and God.
In my mind I would systematically erase or subtract each thing.
First I would imagine everything gone except the space and God. Then I would imagine that the space that all things were in is gone.
But no matter how hard I tried I could not conceive of what would remain if I imagined no God.
It seemed to me that it is impossible for there to be absolutely nothing.
Now you could say that all there is is space and matter and that these two could exist without there being a God, and if that were the case then try to imagine a realm were space and matter did not exist.
I don't think it can be done. Nor do I think that such a realm can be.
So, where did everything come from. The only answer is that everything was made.
09 Mar 07
1 edit
Originally posted by josephwYou should amend that to "the only answer for ME is that everything is made"
Irrefutable evidence.
Way back in my early 20's, before I knew God, I developed a mental exercise I would go through each night as I fell asleep. You see, I was determined to know whether or not there was a God, so I began to think.
I thought, here I am in this material universe, in space. There are three things there. Matter, the space that matter exist ealm can be.
So, where did everything come from. The only answer is that everything was made.
Now that you have come to that conclusion, do you now want to pray to that maker all the time? Or just acknowledge this internal fact and go on with your life?
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by twhiteheadHe wanted reasons I gave three.
One. Please define "Order" as it is a rather vague term.
Two. Good and evil do not exist.
Three. You'll just have to wait and see. Or not see as the case may be.
Of course condition No 3 really boils down to "I cant be convinced in this lifetime!"
Kelly
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by scottishinnzChemistry at best is the study of order, it is not be the reason for it.
Well, "order" can be explained through simply chemistry, without the need for God.
"Good" and "Evil" are mere subjective judgements; they've changed many times in the past,but the biggies remain the same, exactly the same as every other species on the planet, pretty much.
That's called evolutionary biology.
As for 3, well, Kelly, unless you a ...[text shortened]... eally, really committed, you can't argue whether or not an afterlife exists or not yet.
I do not agree that good and evil are purely subjective, in some cases it is matter of personal taste yes, but that is not same thing as saying our personal taste are not wrapped around something very real such as good and evil.
He wanted a reason for me to say I was wrong about God, at death I'll know, just as you will.
Kelly
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by KellyJayOr not.
Chemistry at best is the study of order, it is not be the reason for it.
I do not agree that good and evil are purely subjective, in some cases it is matter of personal taste yes, but that is not same thing as saying our personal taste are not wrapped around something very real such as good and evil.
He wanted a reason for me to say I was wrong about God, at death I'll know, just as you will.
Kelly
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by howardgeeprove to me you exist then i prove to you god does
This is a sincere question for everybody out there who believes that God exists.
It is a thought experiment for you, so give it a good shot and please admit it if you cannot think of anything at all, as this is all a part of the exercise.
The question for you to try to answer is this:
"What evidence would be sufficient to persuade you that God does not exist?"
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by howardgee"What evidence would be sufficient to persuade you that God does not exist?"
This is a sincere question for everybody out there who believes that God exists.
It is a thought experiment for you, so give it a good shot and please admit it if you cannot think of anything at all, as this is all a part of the exercise.
The question for you to try to answer is this:
"What evidence would be sufficient to persuade you that God does not exist?"
For me it would have to be a systematic dismantling of the spiritual experiences of mankind. So for example if it could be shown that the Christian experience of the Holy Spirit could be dismissed as false in a convincing way then that would be much more of a problem for me than any philosophical argument or even scientific evidence. It's very hard to believe God doesn't exist if he keeps pestering you with his presence.