Originally posted by FabianFnasThis comment is too stupid to warrant any other response than 'get knotted'. So get knotted.
Neither did Newton know anything about BigBang... 😛
As for Spinoza, his views can be applied to thinking about the Big Bang -- in ways that do not comfort creationists. But please continue to languish in your appalling ignorance and mental laziness. For you, the world was created 300 years ago, never mind 6000.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageA simple rule when iterated for a long time provides the illusion of extreme complexity. I think that his point is that what seems unnaturally complex (e.g. stars, planetary systems, orbits, satellites, etc.) can be simply one such illusion.
The groovy fractals that were on the cover of every popular chaos theory book at one point. Infinity and beyond! What's your point?
Originally posted by PalynkaOh, right. A Huge Ever Growing Pulsating Brain That Rules FromThe Centre Of The Ultraworld.
A simple rule when iterated for a long time provides the illusion of extreme complexity. I think that his point is that what seems unnaturally complex (e.g. stars, planetary systems, orbits, satellites, etc.) can be simply one such illusion.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageOf course it was a stupid remark, therefore I put a smile to show that.
This comment is too stupid to warrant any other response than 'get knotted'. So get knotted.
As for Spinoza, his views can be applied to thinking about the Big Bang -- in ways that do not comfort creationists. But please continue to languish in your appalling ignorance and mental laziness. For you, the world was created 300 years ago, never mind 6000.
You know Spinoza, I don't, so? Bragging...?
Why this sudden hostility? 😕