13 Jun 20
@secondson saidYour assertions about supernatural beings are all subjective speculations and opinions.
Then, I think, there are those that make assertions that are merely their opinions.
Self awareness is overrated. One is better off being aware of Christ.
14 Jun 20
@secondson saidYou are perfectly entitled to believe that your speculations about supernatural matters are truths. But as long as you are making assertions about things or beings you simply have faith in ~ assertions that are immune to empirical scrutiny ~ then you are in the realm of subjectivity.
Unless, of course, you're wrong, and my assertions are based in truth.
14 Jun 20
-Removed-Odd that you can't see how it is you that is whining.
The OP is a whine. You typify a complaining whiner probably because you feel helpless to control and reconcile the opinions and beliefs of others that disagree with your sanctimonious opinions, ergo the launching of your typical lambasting diatribes as exemplified by your OP and the majority of the content of all your posts.
14 Jun 20
@fmf saidAnd you are entitled to your own distorted opinions.
You are perfectly entitled to believe that your speculations about supernatural matters are truths. But as long as you are making assertions about things or beings you simply have faith in ~ assertions that are immune to empirical scrutiny ~ then you are in the realm of subjectivity.
That you deny God's revelation of Himself to mankind, and assume, without empirical evidence to the contrary, that an assertion made by God Himself about Himself has no validity, based on your limited knowledge and experience, then you are in the realm of the subjective and fail to recognize objective truth.
14 Jun 20
@secondson saidMy opinions ~ as are yours on these supernatural/ spiritual matters ~ are subjective. Perhaps that's what you mean by the word "distorted". It's not a word I have ever used to describe your faith, beliefs, opinions. "Subjective" is sufficient.
And you are entitled to your own distorted opinions.
14 Jun 20
@secondson saidThere is no onus on me to provide empirical evidence to somehow prove that anyone's God figure does not exist. Nor do I need to.
That you deny God's revelation of Himself to mankind, and assume, without empirical evidence to the contrary, that an assertion made by God Himself about Himself has no validity, based on your limited knowledge and experience, then you are in the realm of the subjective and fail to recognize objective truth.
I have no credible reason to believe you have any factual information about any possible God or possible creator being that may or may not exist.
So your claims about what such a being has supposedly "asserted" to human beings cannot be described as objective facts or truths. If they were, I would believe them for the same reason you do.
14 Jun 20
2 edits
@SecondSon
That you deny God's revelation of Himself to mankind, and assume, without empirical evidence to the contrary, that an assertion made by God Himself about Himself has no validity, based on your limited knowledge and experience, then you are in the realm of the subjective and fail to recognize objective truth.
you are in the realm of the subjective
Yes I am. You are right. And I have never claimed otherwise.