Age of Earth - Thousands Not Billions

Originally posted by RJHinds
I believe it is more rational that an intelligent Creator created laws to form order out of the invisible to produce what is visible than to believe nothing accidently exploded causing order to come from chaos. 😏

Irrelevant. Why not address the point I raised instead?

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
Irrelevant. Why not address the point I raised instead?

You Must Be Referring To The RATE project - Radioactivity and the Age of The Earth (RATE).

For a little introductory information on this see the following video:

YouTube

For more in-depth information see the following video

Radio-isotopes and the Age of the Earth. Dr. Larry Vardiman

You can also get a little information to read from here:

http://creation.com/radiometric-dating-breakthroughs

Originally posted by RJHinds
You Must Be Referring To The RATE project - Radioactivity and the Age of The Earth (RATE).

For a little introductory information on this see the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPynJVPq74Q

For more in-depth information see the following video

Radio-isotopes and the Age of the Earth. Dr. Larry Vardiman

You can also get a little information to read from here:

http://creation.com/radiometric-dating-breakthroughs

http://godandscience.org/youngearth/age_of_the_earth.html#science

There are no reputable scientists who agree with your position. There are many reputable christians who regard your position as ridiculous. Your 'sources' are hilarious.

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
http://godandscience.org/youngearth/age_of_the_earth.html#science

There are no reputable scientists who agree with your position. There are many reputable christians who regard your position as ridiculous. Your 'sources' are hilarious.

Only hilarious to the unbelieving. Blessed are those that believe. 😏

HalleluYah !!! Praise the LORD! Holy! Holy! Holy!

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
http://godandscience.org/youngearth/age_of_the_earth.html#science

There are no reputable scientists who agree with your position. There are many reputable christians who regard your position as ridiculous. Your 'sources' are hilarious.

The trouble is, when someone digs them self into a hole they lose all perspective and can only look to the worms around them for support.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
The trouble is, when someone digs them self into a hole they lose all perspective and can only look to the worms around them for support.

"But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."

(Revelation 21:8 NASB)

Originally posted by RJHinds

"But for the cowardly and [b]unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death."

(Revelation 21:8 NASB)[/b]

Bottom line; if i were presented with concrete proof that God existed then i would believe in God. If you however were presented with concrete proof that the world was billions of years old, you still wouldn't believe it.

You simply seem content to cherry pick from banana trees.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Bottom line; if i were presented with concrete proof that God existed then i would believe in God. If you however were presented with concrete proof that the world was billions of years old, you still wouldn't believe it.

You simply seem content to cherry pick from banana trees.

You will not accept the proof when submitted, because you think you already know the truth. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
You will not accept the proof when submitted, because you think you already know the truth. 😏

Talking to yourself there old chap?

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have heard about those other isotopes used to get the dates they want for supposedly older rocks.

So why bring up carbon dating in the context of the age of the Earth?

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
So why bring up carbon dating in the context of the age of the Earth?

It's a good example of the problems and flaws associated with that method of attempting to date things on the Earth as well as the earth itself. Obviously, it is not a reliable method of dating. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
I believe it is more rational that an intelligent Creator created laws to form order out of the invisible to produce what is visible than to believe nothing accidently exploded causing order to come from chaos. 😏

You really do not get it, do you Ron?

"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light." -- Genesis 1:3, KJV

And this was the Big Bang. (And boy, was there light.)

I do not believe that nothing accidentally exploded either. The Hand of God was evident throughout Creation. It could not have been any other way. Even evolution was subtly directed by the Hand of God.

I just don't understand why you can't figure out the importance of leaving wiggle room in creation. This enables those who boast of their own great minds to envision a beginning without God. And thus free will is supported and maintained.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Bottom line; if i were presented with concrete proof that God existed then i would believe in God. If you however were presented with concrete proof that the world was billions of years old, you still wouldn't believe it.

You simply seem content to cherry pick from banana trees.

"Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed." -- John 20:29

Faith is the belief in those things unseen. You have just decided to shackle yourself to an idea created by man to make up for his lack of faith. You hitch your wagon to the scientific method because it's the easy way out. No need to believe in scary things you cannot prove.

Whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess.

Originally posted by Suzianne
You really do not get it, do you Ron?

"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light." -- Genesis 1:3, KJV

And this was the Big Bang. (And boy, was there light.)

I do not believe that nothing accidentally exploded either. The Hand of God was evident throughout Creation. It could not have been any other way. Even evolution was sub ...[text shortened]... reat minds to envision a beginning without God. And thus free will is supported and maintained.

I don't see that the appearance of light would require a Big Bang.

Genesis declares the quick creation of plants and animals and provides no time for evolution in the manner claimed by the atheists. I see no reason to provide wiggle room for them to deceive and lead the little ones astray.

The fact that God created humans in His own image instead of the image of a monkey does not take away free will from anyone. The fact that living creatures reproduce after their kind is proof that the evolutionists are wrong.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't see that the appearance of light would require a Big Bang.

Genesis declares the quick creation of plants and animals and provides no time for evolution in the manner claimed by the atheists. I see no reason to provide wiggle room for them to deceive and lead the little ones astray.

The fact that God created humans in His own image instead of ...[text shortened]... fact that living creatures reproduce after their kind is proof that the evolutionists are wrong.

It is very well indeed you only have a very limited access to little ones whose minds you would pollute with your nonsense.

So far, nobody here agrees with you, everyone posting here has called your claims ridiculous.

You are in a band of one here. Good luck with that. Hide your head in the sand and all you will see are little grains of sand. Maybe it would entertain you to count them and try to figure out how old they might be.