Originally posted by ZahlanziI'll give you a "Braise Jebus" 🙂
bravo! can i get a "Praise jesus!" for our brother in faith robbie?
Yes, robbiecarrobie is a politician of the spiritual, marrying YEC views with Islamophobia of the worst kind. Apart from that he seems a nice enough bloke with a good brain.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageAnd in addition, Popper is always aware of the concept of "World 1, World 2 and World 3", according to wich -BTW- we are in front of an interesting conclusion: "religion", -any religion!-, a concept which Popper considers that belongs to the World 3, is...
Pity that many Christians don't dismiss evolutionary theory, eh. Mendel, for example.
Popper: "I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme---a possible framework for testable scientific theories. "
He's talking specifically about Darwin's theory of natural selection, not ...[text shortened]... al existence of demons. Not that I have a problem with that; I just need confirmation.
Do ye remember what is it, robbie pal?
😵
Originally posted by Bosse de Nagewhich only accentuates the feeling of sadness at the blatant waste of good brain power.
I'll give you a "Braise Jebus" 🙂
Yes, robbiecarrobie is a politician of the spiritual, marrying YEC views with Islamophobia of the worst kind. Apart from that he seems a nice enough bloke with a good brain.
Originally posted by rwingettanother edit policeman, ne naw ne naw! why don't you try posting something with relevance and content rather than dogmatic statements and try a little objectivity for once it will do you the world of good!
You'll need more than seven edits to make this pile of garbage plausible.
Originally posted by sonhouseum i dont mean to be rude or anything but i dont know if you noticed, i was not the author of those words, those were the words of eminent evolutionists, not mine, i merely reproduced them to show that Darwinian evolution, correctly identified by bosse, was not nor can be subject to the scientific model, that's all, if you can refute this then be my guest!
Your anti-evolutionary stance boils down to one thing, and one thing only: words. Words in a 2000 year old text that you don't even know has been translated correctly, not that that matters because they didn't know squat about the real world, only the fantasies they made up and you fell for it hook line and sinker. You emote scepticism like a the air that f ...[text shortened]... ity, reason. You subjugate reason to dogma. Shame on you for self lobotomizing your brain.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWrong again. These are Popper's exact words:
um i dont mean to be rude or anything but i dont know if you noticed, i was not the author of those words, those were the words of eminent evolutionists, not mine, i merely reproduced them to show that Darwinian evolution, correctly identified by bosse, was not nor can be subject to the scientific model, that's all, if you can refute this then be my guest!
However, Darwin's own most important contribution to the theory of evolution, his theory of natural selection, is difficult to test. There are some tests, even some experimental tests; and in some cases, such as the famous phenomenom known as "industrial melanism", we can observe natural selection happening under our very eyes, as it were. Nevertheless, really severe tests of the theory of natural selection are hard to come by, much more so than tests of otherwise comparable theories in physics or chemistry.
You've -- disingenuously -- distorted Popper's views to prove your own point (and, perhaps, twhitehead's).
Originally posted by Bosse de NageBosse my dear friend, i am not a YEC, infact i did not even know what a YEC was until that bad ol putty cat Zelhanzi while in the process of calling me an idiot enlightened me to what it was, its absurd to hold that the earth is a mere 6000 years old, its goes against all scientifically establish geological data, no no my dear friend, the earth is easily millions, billions of years old.
I'll give you a "Braise Jebus" 🙂
Yes, robbiecarrobie is a politician of the spiritual, marrying YEC views with Islamophobia of the worst kind. Apart from that he seems a nice enough bloke with a good brain.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiehe was referring to your blind faith in genesis
um i dont mean to be rude or anything but i dont know if you noticed, i was not the author of those words, those were the words of eminent evolutionists, not mine, i merely reproduced them to show that Darwinian evolution, correctly identified by bosse, was not nor can be subject to the scientific model, that's all, if you can refute this then be my guest!
Originally posted by Bosse de Nageactually if you look at the wording again my friend i stated that Popper was the source of Dobzhansky statement, not that this was his actual words, one must be quite clear about this
Wrong again. These are Popper's exact words:
However, Darwin's own most important contribution to the theory of evolution, his theory of natural selection, is [b]difficult to test. There are some tests, even some experimental tests; and in some cases, such as the famous phenomenom known as "industrial melanism", we can observe natural selection ...[text shortened]... nuously -- distorted Popper's views to prove your own point (and, perhaps, twhitehead's).[/b]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieand that fits in with genesis how?
Bosse my dear friend, i am not a YEC, infact i did not even know what a YEC was until that bad ol putty cat Zelhanzi while in the process of calling me an idiot enlightened me to what it was, its absurd to hold that the earth is a mere 6000 years old, its goes against all scientifically establish geological data, no no my dear friend, the earth is easily millions, billions of years old.
or you dont thing genesis is real either?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOK ... Give me the scientific explanation for the Nephilim, extended antediluvian lifespans ...
Bosse my dear friend, i am not a YEC, infact i did not even know what a YEC was until that bad ol putty cat Zelhanzi while in the process of calling me an idiot enlightened me to what it was, its absurd to hold that the earth is a mere 6000 years old, its goes against all scientifically establish geological data, no no my dear friend, the earth is easily millions, billions of years old.