Originally posted by FetchmyjunkWe are talking about my belief, right? ...and not about something I require you to believe. So, I don't find your claims credible. In fact, I believe that you don't know the origin of the universe but that you have settled upon and committed yourself to an explanation that you personally find plausible.
Based upon what do you decide that it is implausible?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkIf somebody claims to know something of such moment, the grounds for that knowledge should be considered. One's own personal feelings and pre-scientific scripture may be considered by some a reasonable basis for belief, but certainly no more than that.
So the fact that you are not convinced automatically means that they don't know?
Originally posted by avalanchethecatOne of the issues I have is when people claim no knowledge yet can proclaim in their ignorance, that they know somethings are just wrong about the start of the universe.
If somebody claims to know something of such moment, the grounds for that knowledge should be considered. One's own personal feelings and pre-scientific scripture may be considered by some a reasonable basis for belief, but certainly no more than that.
Originally posted by KellyJayIt is quite reasonable to claim that one does not know how X happened, but to also claim to know it wasn't because of some Y. It's called ruling things out.
One of the issues I have is when people claim no knowledge yet can proclaim in their ignorance, that they know somethings are just wrong about the start of the universe.
Originally posted by KellyJayYou mean like having no knowledge of the square root of 1945.623, yet having the audacity to rule out the answer of 7?
One of the issues I have is when people claim no knowledge yet can proclaim in their ignorance, that they know somethings are just wrong about the start of the universe.
Originally posted by KellyJayLet me clarify for your the sake of your issue. I don't know that your god didn't create the universe. I do know that you don't know that he did.
One of the issues I have is when people claim no knowledge yet can proclaim in their ignorance, that they know somethings are just wrong about the start of the universe.
23 Mar 17
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeWe can figure out square roots, what can't be done is claim enough knowledge to rule out God with respect to the universe's beginning. Please share the theory you use that you believe is a more reasonable answer.
You mean like having no knowledge of the square root of 1945.623, yet having the audacity to rule out the answer of 7?