Spirituality
28 Sep 16
There are some people on here who think we can't choose any of our beliefs. They say that you can only believe something that you find believable and that you can't choose to believe something that you don't find believable. This seems to indicate that we do not have the ability to decide whether something is believable or not. The way I see it, we are the ones who decide whether or not something is believable, and then we choose to believe that which we have decided is believable. Hence we have the ability to change our minds and our beliefs when new evidence comes to light. Also I believe that even if something is 'convincing' we have the ability to reject it.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkWasn't this already discussed ad nauseam in just the last few weeks? You've added nothing new whatsoever [to what has already been discussed] with this OP. Isn't there something new - some new aspect - new insight - new examples - a fresh angle - that you want to offer to set up a conversation about this topic?
There are some people on here who think we can't choose any of our beliefs. They say that you can only believe something that you find believable and that you can't choose to believe something that you don't find believable. This seems to indicate that we do not have the ability to decide whether something is believable or not. The way I see it, we are t ...[text shortened]... o light. Also I believe that even if something is 'convincing' we have the ability to reject it.
Originally posted by FMFSo do you still maintain that you can't decide whether something is believable or not?
Wasn't this already discussed ad nauseam in just the last few weeks? You've added nothing new whatsoever [to what has already been discussed] with this OP. Isn't there something new - some new aspect - new insight - new examples - a fresh angle - that you want to offer to set up a conversation about this topic?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkWe discussed the topic of whether people can decide to believe things they don't believe or decide to not believe things that they do believe very recently. Unless you have some new angle to offer, I'll just refer you back to our previous conversation. We've already talked the hind legs off this one.
So do you still maintain that you can't decide whether something is believable or not?
Originally posted by FMFI would like to know what you think makes something believable, if you don't mind me asking. I am trying to understand your perspective. Does it have to be logical to be believable? If it is logical, aren't you the one that decides that it is?
We discussed the topic of whether people can decide to believe things they don't believe or decide to not believe things that they do believe very recently. Unless you have some new angle to offer, I'll just refer you back to our previous conversation. We've already talked the hind legs off this one.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkTake a look at the conversation we had. It was in August and September. I probably posted literally hundreds of times on this topic - many of which were addressed directly to you. You'll find my perspective there.
I would like to know what you think makes something believable, if you don't mind me asking. I am trying to understand your perspective.
Originally posted by FMFDo you agree that something has to be 'logical' and 'make sense' for you to believe it? Aren't you the one that decides whether or not something is 'logical' and 'makes sense'? I agree that you cannot force yourself to believe something that you have already decided doesn't make sense. But surely the decision was yours.
Take a look at the conversation we had. It was in August and September. I probably posted literally hundreds of times on this topic - many of which were addressed directly to you. You'll find my perspective there.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkAlready asked. And answered. As you well know. I think you are just taking the piss. Again. 😉
Do you agree that something has to be 'logical' and 'make sense' for you to believe it? Aren't you the one that decides whether or not something is 'logical' and 'makes sense'? I agree that you cannot force yourself to believe something that you have already decided doesn't make sense. But surely the decision was yours.
28 Sep 16
Originally posted by apathistI can't say I can recall anyone on this forum taking these stances. Maybe you're right though. In the last couple of months we have been discussing belief - as in faith - right? Which is, to my way of thinking, here on this forum especially, belief or faith in supernatural beings or in religious doctrines or theories about supernatural phenomena based on "spiritual apprehension" (or expectation of divine things hoped for) - rather than on proof or evidence.
I believe that some people think that believing doesn't involve thinking. I think they believe that thinking doesn't involve believing.