Spirituality
28 Sep 16
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkYou were asking me why divegeester was [INSERT YOUR PERSONAL OPINION ABOUT HIM HERE]. If you weren't looking for either [1] my reassurance, [2] my support or [3] my analysis about your personal opinion about him, then why on earth were you asking me about it?
Don't flatter yourself. What makes you think that I would ever even consider coming to you for reassurance, support or analysis?
Originally posted by FMFMost questions I ask you turn out to be 'rhetorical' since you have a tendency to dodge them. 😉
You were asking me why divegeester was [INSERT YOUR PERSONAL OPINION ABOUT HIM HERE]. If you weren't looking for either [1] my reassurance, [2] my support or [3] my analysis about your personal opinion about him, then why on earth were you asking me about it?
Originally posted by FMFI'm sure you groom him well, but I really think the blue cooling coat would suit him.
No it's fine by me if you want to use the same borrowed joke over and over again. There are a few others posters who do it too.
http://www.petsathome.com/shop/en/pets/dog/dog-coats-and-clothing
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkIf I am religious and you are religious, does that scenario preclude either one or both of us being dickheads? And if your answer is affirmative, then you can rest assured that I am quite convinced that you are, in fact, a dickhead.
If the Geester is religious, then the million dollar questions are why is he so condescending towards other religious people? And why can't he stand up for his own beliefs? And why did he call himself your lapdog?
Peace and all that...
Originally posted by divegeesterFMF has groomed you well, he must be proud. Yet again.
If I am religious and you are religious, does that scenario preclude either one or both of us being dickheads? And if your answer is affirmative, then you can rest assured that I am quite convinced that you are, in fact, a dickhead.
Peace and all that...
Originally posted by apathistI'm not convinced by this notion of 'deciding what sort of justification to accept'. Any such choice is severely constrained. People are more or less coherent entities, we do not accept one level of justification on one occasion and then drastically change our evidential requirements on another, similar, occasion. The justifications any particular person will accept cannot be inconsistent with their world view. To change that one needs a justification consistent with one's current world view to accept some type of evidence or argument, so there are constraints on what one can talk oneself into believing.
Originally posted by DeepThought... [b]We produce an instant instinctive response, in so far as free will is involved it can only involve training our instincts in advance.
Sometimes that's the case, yes.
Essentially what you've argued is that we choose what we find plausible,
Sometimes that's the case, yes. We all do this, by deciding what sort of justification to accept.[/b]