Go back
Believers, Non-Believers & Morality

Believers, Non-Believers & Morality

Spirituality

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
22 Apr 18

Romans1009, it's after 4 am where you are. Don't stay up on my account. We can resume this anytime.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @fmf
Self-interest and altruism clearly co-exist. There are people all along the continuum, and there are people that swing between the two depending on the circumstances.
Don’t agree. Self-interest would say, “Why give $20 to hurricane relief? I could use that to buy groceries.”

Edit: If morality developed through an evolutionary process, why did the altruism develop?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18

Originally posted by @fmf
Things change - evolve - develop - grow - adapt - progress over time. This includes human activities. It's not controversial.
I think it’s a little more involved and “in the weeds” than that.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
22 Apr 18

Originally posted by @romans1009
Here’s part of what I wrote in response:

“My morality is not “borrowed from an outside agency.” It exists within me and is as much a part of me as anything else.

You studied theology and don’t understand that God’s Holy Spirit indwells Christians? That God’s Holy Spirit is as much a part of a Christian as his or her feet and legs - more a part, actually, as the feet and legs can be removed.”
The "outside agency" is the mythology, the literature, the doctrines of your religion. The idea that a supernatural entity you call "God’s Holy Spirit" is inside you making you do stuff - or not do stuff - is nonsense to atheists.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
22 Apr 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @romans1009
Don’t agree. Self-interest would say, “Why give $20 to hurricane relief? I could use that to buy groceries.”
Different strokes for different folks.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18

Originally posted by @fmf
The "outside agency" is the mythology, the literature, the doctrines of your religion. The idea that a supernatural entity you call "God’s Holy Spirit" is inside you making you do stuff - or not do stuff - is nonsense to atheists.
I disagree with your view on what he meant but I’d rather hear from him as this may be a case where he didn’t express himself clearly.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
22 Apr 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

FMF: Things change - evolve - develop - grow - adapt - progress over time. This includes human activities. It's not controversial.

Originally posted by @romans1009
I think it’s a little more involved and “in the weeds” than that.
I've no idea what you mean. This may be a use of this coloquialism that I'm not familiar with. That human activities and interactions have evolved over time is not an assertion that is overwhelmed or undermined by problems or difficulties.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
22 Apr 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @romans1009
I disagree with your view on what he meant but I’d rather hear from him as this may be a case where he didn’t express himself clearly.
I think you simply tripped over again in your haste. I also think it's possible you'll not admit it and just brazen it out

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @fmf
I think you simply tripped over again in your haste. I also think it's possible you'll not admit it and just brazen it out
You don’t seem to understand the concept of accepting ideas, beliefs or terms for the sake of argument. You can’t present a Christian’s position but dismiss or ignore what a Christian believes while presenting that position, which is what you would have me believe Ghost did.

Edit: In my opinion, Ghost simply did not know a major tenet of the Christian faith. If he did, then he should not have tried to present a Christian’s belief system and perspective from an atheist’s mindset. It’s contradictory and makes no sense.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
I've no idea what you mean. This may be a use of this coloquialism that I'm not familiar with. That human activities and interactions have evolved over time is not an assertion that is overwhelmed or undermined by problems or difficulties.
My comment in that instance pertained to biological evolution.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29836
Clock
22 Apr 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @romans1009
An atheist’s morality, however flawed, is not difficult to maintain in a comfortable environment.

Place an atheist and a Christian in an extremely stressful or dire circumstance. There’s the test.

My morality is not “borrowed from an outside agency.” It exists within me and is as much a part of me as anything else.

You studied theology and don’t ...[text shortened]... istian as his or her feet and legs - more a part, actually, as the feet and legs can be removed.
You have made yourself 'hollow' to receive the law/spirit of God. If that spirit ever leaves you, only hollowness will remain.

That's why, in your test of an atheist and a Christian put in an extremely stressful or dire circumstance, the atheist is 'more' likely to remain intact, due to his self-sufficiency. The very second you think your God has abandoned you, all hell will break loose.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29836
Clock
22 Apr 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @romans1009

Edit: In my opinion, Ghost simply did not know a major tenet of the Christian faith. If he did, then he should not have tried to present a Christian’s belief system and perspective from an atheist’s mindset. It’s contradictory and makes no sense.[/b]
You keep referencing my theology degree. Perhaps it is your lack of one which keeps you misunderstanding the things I clearly express?

Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
You have made yourself 'hollow' to receive the law/spirit of God. If that spirit ever leaves you, only hollowness will remain.

That's why, in your test of an atheist and a Christian put in an extremely stressful or dire circumstance, the atheist is 'more' likely to remain intact, due to his self-sufficiency. The very second you think your God has abandoned you, all hell will break loose.
God does not leave or abandon His children.

“Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.

So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.”

(Hebrews 13:5-6)

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
You keep referencing my theology degree. Perhaps it is your lack of one which keeps you misunderstanding the things I clearly express?

Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?
Were you trying to present a Christian’s position and beliefs while at the same time dismissing a Christian’s position and beliefs?

Either you were doing that or you didn’t know a major tenet of the Christian faith.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
31 Jan 18
Moves
3456
Clock
22 Apr 18

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
You keep referencing my theology degree. Perhaps it is your lack of one which keeps you misunderstanding the things I clearly express?

Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?
<<Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?>>

I’d actually prefer that you more carefully consider what you’re posting so you express yourself better.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.