Originally posted by @fmfDon’t agree. Self-interest would say, “Why give $20 to hurricane relief? I could use that to buy groceries.”
Self-interest and altruism clearly co-exist. There are people all along the continuum, and there are people that swing between the two depending on the circumstances.
Edit: If morality developed through an evolutionary process, why did the altruism develop?
22 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009The "outside agency" is the mythology, the literature, the doctrines of your religion. The idea that a supernatural entity you call "God’s Holy Spirit" is inside you making you do stuff - or not do stuff - is nonsense to atheists.
Here’s part of what I wrote in response:
“My morality is not “borrowed from an outside agency.” It exists within me and is as much a part of me as anything else.
You studied theology and don’t understand that God’s Holy Spirit indwells Christians? That God’s Holy Spirit is as much a part of a Christian as his or her feet and legs - more a part, actually, as the feet and legs can be removed.”
Originally posted by @romans1009Different strokes for different folks.
Don’t agree. Self-interest would say, “Why give $20 to hurricane relief? I could use that to buy groceries.”
22 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfI disagree with your view on what he meant but I’d rather hear from him as this may be a case where he didn’t express himself clearly.
The "outside agency" is the mythology, the literature, the doctrines of your religion. The idea that a supernatural entity you call "God’s Holy Spirit" is inside you making you do stuff - or not do stuff - is nonsense to atheists.
FMF: Things change - evolve - develop - grow - adapt - progress over time. This includes human activities. It's not controversial.I've no idea what you mean. This may be a use of this coloquialism that I'm not familiar with. That human activities and interactions have evolved over time is not an assertion that is overwhelmed or undermined by problems or difficulties.
Originally posted by @romans1009
I think it’s a little more involved and “in the weeds” than that.
Originally posted by @romans1009I think you simply tripped over again in your haste. I also think it's possible you'll not admit it and just brazen it out
I disagree with your view on what he meant but I’d rather hear from him as this may be a case where he didn’t express himself clearly.
Originally posted by @fmfYou don’t seem to understand the concept of accepting ideas, beliefs or terms for the sake of argument. You can’t present a Christian’s position but dismiss or ignore what a Christian believes while presenting that position, which is what you would have me believe Ghost did.
I think you simply tripped over again in your haste. I also think it's possible you'll not admit it and just brazen it out
Edit: In my opinion, Ghost simply did not know a major tenet of the Christian faith. If he did, then he should not have tried to present a Christian’s belief system and perspective from an atheist’s mindset. It’s contradictory and makes no sense.
Originally posted by @fmfMy comment in that instance pertained to biological evolution.
I've no idea what you mean. This may be a use of this coloquialism that I'm not familiar with. That human activities and interactions have evolved over time is not an assertion that is overwhelmed or undermined by problems or difficulties.
Originally posted by @romans1009You have made yourself 'hollow' to receive the law/spirit of God. If that spirit ever leaves you, only hollowness will remain.
An atheist’s morality, however flawed, is not difficult to maintain in a comfortable environment.
Place an atheist and a Christian in an extremely stressful or dire circumstance. There’s the test.
My morality is not “borrowed from an outside agency.” It exists within me and is as much a part of me as anything else.
You studied theology and don’t ...[text shortened]... istian as his or her feet and legs - more a part, actually, as the feet and legs can be removed.
That's why, in your test of an atheist and a Christian put in an extremely stressful or dire circumstance, the atheist is 'more' likely to remain intact, due to his self-sufficiency. The very second you think your God has abandoned you, all hell will break loose.
Originally posted by @romans1009You keep referencing my theology degree. Perhaps it is your lack of one which keeps you misunderstanding the things I clearly express?
Edit: In my opinion, Ghost simply did not know a major tenet of the Christian faith. If he did, then he should not have tried to present a Christian’s belief system and perspective from an atheist’s mindset. It’s contradictory and makes no sense.[/b]
Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?
22 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeGod does not leave or abandon His children.
You have made yourself 'hollow' to receive the law/spirit of God. If that spirit ever leaves you, only hollowness will remain.
That's why, in your test of an atheist and a Christian put in an extremely stressful or dire circumstance, the atheist is 'more' likely to remain intact, due to his self-sufficiency. The very second you think your God has abandoned you, all hell will break loose.
“Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.”
(Hebrews 13:5-6)
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeWere you trying to present a Christian’s position and beliefs while at the same time dismissing a Christian’s position and beliefs?
You keep referencing my theology degree. Perhaps it is your lack of one which keeps you misunderstanding the things I clearly express?
Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?
Either you were doing that or you didn’t know a major tenet of the Christian faith.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke<<Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?>>
You keep referencing my theology degree. Perhaps it is your lack of one which keeps you misunderstanding the things I clearly express?
Would you like me to dumb things down a little for you?
I’d actually prefer that you more carefully consider what you’re posting so you express yourself better.