Can anyone

Originally posted by googlefudge
Evil Overlord... There's a difference.

They're spelled differently for one thing.

Its actually spelt, they are spelt differently,

Spelt is the past tense of spell in the same way that learnt is the past tense of learn.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
remember a thread where a theist won an argument against an atheist?

Well, since shiiiiite splatters, I'd say who ever has the stick probably also has a brown face... the same one is a loser.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Dude your Karma is too negative, i know you are an evil tyrant and all that, but even Ming the merciless smiled 😀

robbie, best to be kind to a self proclaimed "Infidel".....

Originally posted by RBHILL
RJ's

Fossil record supports creation

hilarious

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Is it reasonable to say that there are competent scientists that disagree with your proof that God does not exist? I have yet to find a competent Christian that believes there is no God. I have heard many times that there are more Christians than there are scientists so by a world vote I believe the God believers to have won the argument. If we put it ...[text shortened]... nd I pray for you and your friends. I hope you won't be offended because that was not my intent.

science is not up for popular vote. your prove something and it is accepted, otherwise it is not. no matter if you like it or not.

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
science is not up for popular vote. your prove something and it is accepted, otherwise it is not. no matter if you like it or not.

One Codicil for Science: No Laws are legislated or executed by science; science observes and studies them. Yes? No? Other?

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
One Codicil for Science: No Laws are legislated or executed by science; science observes and studies them. Yes? No? Other?

Sentences that are complete and coherent; You know how to write them. Yes? No? Other?

Originally posted by googlefudge
Science isn't up for a vote, it isn't a popularity contest.

And don't pray for me, I want nothing your religion purports to offer.

Nor is Christianity up for a vote or the belief in God. God doesn't need our votes. But we will need his. Science many times can not prove his existence and neither can an Atheist because they choose not to. Not because it's a fact. Facts many times get in the way of discoveries. And science can not prove his existence, because you can't prove anything to anyone that is too busy trying to disprove. Words won't change a mind until the heart is changed.

As for praying it's too late the deed is done. Are you nauseous yet?😉

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its actually spelt, they are spelt differently,

Spelt is the past tense of spell in the same way that learnt is the past tense of learn.

The British may prefer "spelt" [and beyond America, "spelt" may be encountered more often], however "spelled" is also perfectly acceptable. Same goes for "learned" and "learnt".

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
science is not up for popular vote. your prove something and it is accepted, otherwise it is not. no matter if you like it or not.

What is so great about science. They can't even cure the common cold. And you expect me to believe science hold any merit when it comes to the existence of life? An explosion created the earth and stars and up from the ground came a bubbling goo that suddenly turned into an ape and then some million years or so later somehow humans evolved into what we have become today? I say that is much less believable than creationism. But then again who knows what methods of creation God used. But you are daffy if you think apes were here before man. Like that freekish evolution chart shows. You are right that science isn't popular. It has it's place but not when it comes to disproving the existence of God. The best selling book in the world is the 'Bible' not a 'science' book. No matter if you like it or not. It has been accepted many times over any Science book and probably all science books combined. That is real proof. Let that soak into your heart for awhile. I'm not sure your mind is up to the task.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Sentences that are complete and coherent; You know how to write them. Yes? No? Other?

Concluding prompts, gf. Why one word? Sometimes ungainly 18-Wheeler Paragraphs are required to deliver the real or imagined verbal load. At odd moments on other days, Lady Concision rules. Other times it's prudent to post silence.

Originally posted by cashthetrash
What is so great about science. They can't even cure the common cold. And you expect me to believe science hold any merit when it comes to the existence of life? An explosion created the earth and stars and up from the ground came a bubbling goo that suddenly turned into an ape and then some million years or so later somehow humans evolved into what we ...[text shortened]... real proof. Let that soak into your heart for awhile. I'm not sure your mind is up to the task.

What is so great about science, you ask? Well, how'bout Internet forums where people are free to bash science, for starters.

Originally posted by FMF
The British may prefer "spelt" [and beyond America, "spelt" may be encountered more often], however "spelled" is also perfectly acceptable. Same goes for "learned" and "learnt".

yes but its always interesting to be pedantic to an insufferable pedant! 😵

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes but its always interesting to be pedantic to an insufferable pedant! 😵

It's much better for you to hit the target, though, in those situations, than to get corrected by someone like me.

Originally posted by FMF
It's much better for you to hit the target, though, in those situations, than to get corrected by someone like me.

why would i not take correction from you FMF, indeed, I have come to accept (although it has taken some time) that to view an adversary as an enemy is quite wrong, they are in many instances simply a necessary prerequisite to establish truth 😀