@suzianne saidWhen I was a Christian, I shared your "love thy neighbour" philosophy. It was part of my faith.
If this is an issue for you, good luck with that. It would, if you were a Christian, presumably color the quantity or the quality of love you show for them. Doesn't this weaken the whole "love your neighbor" philosophy?
Nowadays, my perspective on homosexuals - one that sees being free of prejudice and being against discrimination as ideals - is "secular" for want of a better word.
There is no doubt, however, that the Christian "love thy neighbour" philosophy continues to influence my moral compass, even 20 years since losing my faith.
@suzianne saidAs a Christian, you either see homosexual acts as "sins" or you don't.
It certainly does affect everything regarding how these people would be treated by you. I'm of the opinion that this is not what Jesus had in mind with this commandment.
You can still have your "love thy neighbour" philosophy even if you recognize that, according to Christian teaching, some things are "sinful".
Indeed, one might say that the "love thy neighbour" philosophy is more important than ever when the neighbours are "sinners" according to your religious faith.
@divegeester saidThere was a certain amount of "bullying", certainly, but what is becoming more and more clear over time is that at least some, and more likely most, of this "bullying" was warranted, given the inappropriateness of the things he said. Every community has standards, that when violated, will result in the expulsion of those guilty of violating those standards. This appears to be what happened in this case.
Do you still hold to your famous claim that Ghost of a Duke (along with FMF and myself) “bullied Romans1009 off of the website”?
@josephw saidNot really. Not to me. I think your view is a conventional Christian belief. You certainly don't need to be courageous to state what your belief is regarding such a matter on a forum like this.
Question: is it "courageous" of me to take a stand and state that, I believe, according to the scriptures, homosexuality is a sin?
@suzianne saidYou are mistaken. Romans1009 was not bullied by Ghost of a Duke or divegeester or me ~ or by anyone for that matter. Indeed, the three of us did not interact with him at all for 3-4 months, and his trolling just continued and even increased. Ghost of a Duke, in many ways, copped the worst/most of it and yet Ghost of a Duke didn't bully him. The same goes for divegeester and me.
There was a certain amount of "bullying", certainly, but what is becoming more and more clear over time is that at least some, and more likely most, of this "bullying" was warranted, given the inappropriateness of the things he said.
@fmf saidWhat sins people commit are between them and their Maker. I am told not to judge and to treat them as I would prefer to be treated, and further, to love them as I love myself, as an equal being, no better and no worse, as myself. Modern Christianity seems hellbent (heh) on blaming others, on treating them as "less than" me, on using others to exalt myself above others. This is, no doubt, sinful behavior, and as such is never recommended or encouraged by Jesus.
As a Christian, you either see homosexual acts as "sins" or you don't.
You can still have your "love thy neighbour" philosophy even if you recognize that, according to Christian teaching, some things are "sinful".
Indeed, one might say that the "love thy neighbour" philosophy is more important than ever when the neighbours are "sinners" according to your religious faith.
@fmf saidYou said this on page one: "I think coming out as a homosexual and speaking out against discrimination can be very courageous stances to take in many situations and contexts".
Not really. Not to me. I think your view is a conventional Christian belief. You certainly don't need to be courageous to state what your belief is regarding such a matter on a forum like this.
Would my "stance" be considered "courageous" if I said it in the "context" of a homosexual "coming out" in "a forum like this"?
@fmf saidYou are entitled to your opinion.
You are mistaken. Romans1009 was not bullied by Ghost of a Duke or divegeester or me ~ or by anyone for that matter. Indeed, the three of us did not interact with him at all for 3-4 months, and his trolling just continued and even increased. Ghost of a Duke, in many ways, copped the worst/most of it and yet Ghost of a Duke didn't bully him. The same goes for divegeester and me.
@suzianne saidThere was no bullying by Ghost of a Duke; you misrepresented him (and others) very badly.
There was a certain amount of "bullying", certainly, but what is becoming more and more clear over time is that at least some, and more likely most, of this "bullying" was warranted, given the inappropriateness of the things he said. Every community has standards, that when violated, will result in the expulsion of those guilty of violating those standards. This appears to be what happened in this case.
What a pity that you lacked the ability to show some integrity at that time back in September 2018.
05 Feb 22
@divegeester saidYou are entitled to try to shape the perception of the past as you like, even to the point of misrepresentation, but I certainly am equally entitled to disagree with you.
There was no bullying by Ghost of a Duke; you misrepresented him (and others) very badly.
What a pity that you lacked the ability to show some integrity at that time back in September 2018.