@dj2becker saidWhat's interesting is that Romans1009 insists that I am mentally ill and suffering from OCD and ADHD and yet continues to troll me anyway. Why would he do that to someone he insists has mental health problems?
Autism good, OCD bad, (as long as the OCD diagnosis is made by Romans, Isn’t that right?
I haven't addressed him or replied to any of his posts since May - that's six months ago - and yet a very high proportion of his hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of posts since than have still been addressed to me, all of them repetitive insults and ridicule.
Why would he do this to some he thought was mentally ill?
@fmf saidMaybe if you had talked to him you could have asked him yourself.
What's interesting is that Romans1009 insists that I am mentally ill and suffering from OCD and ADHD and yet continues to troll me anyway. Why would he do that to someone he insists has mental health problems?
I haven't addressed him or replied to any of his posts since May - that's six months ago - and yet a very high proportion of his hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of p ...[text shortened]... them repetitive insults and ridicule.
Why would he do this to some he thought was mentally ill?
18 Oct 18
@dj2becker saidDo you think he was entitled to such indulgence from me in the face of the kinds of posts he was aiming at me?
Maybe if you had talked to him you could have asked him yourself.
18 Oct 18
@dj2becker saidDo you believe what Romans1009 did to me was 'the same as' what you feel I did to you?
The irony of course is that you have a
problem with Romans doing what you did.
@dj2becker saidYour much self-vaunted "objective morals" have not prevented your online-persona's integrity from assuming a foetal position, it would seem.
That’s for me to know and for you to find out I guess.
@dj2becker saidNo, I don't think so. Just because you have a manchild gimmick of parroting the exact words that have been put to you, back at the person who put them to you, doesn't mean that you are hitting any target; indeed, more often than not it simply indicates that you did not understand the dynamic in our exchange. The gimmick makes you look silly.
Is that what your online persona was doing when you gave me the exact same response to questions I asked you?
@philokalia said"In a like manner"? I haven't addressed any posts to Romans1009 since mid-May this year. In that time he has stalked me across multiple threads and addressed hundreds and hundreds of posts to me.
You guys relentlessly pick on him but when he responds in a like manner..?
@fmf saidSeems you don’t like the taste of your own medicine.😂
No, I don't think so. Just because you have a manchild gimmick of parroting the exact words that have been put to you, back at the person who put them to you, doesn't mean that you are hitting any target; indeed, more often than not it simply indicates that you did not understand the dynamic in our exchange. The gimmick makes you look silly.
@fmf saidWhen you mention his name in a post and he replies to it then he is stalking you. Makes sense.
"In a like manner"? I haven't addressed any posts to Romans1009 since mid-May this year. In that time he has stalked me across multiple threads and addressed hundreds and hundreds of posts to me.
18 Oct 18
@dj2becker saidI don't think you are dishing out any "medicine" at all. I think you are simply trying to brazen your way out of what is being discussed by being smarmy ~ but are doing so in the most clumsy and blatant way.
Seems you don’t like the taste of your own medicine.😂
@fmf saidYou should call things as you see them. I do. I find your reaction to my use of your own gimmicks amusing to say the least.
I don't think you are dishing out any "medicine" at all. I think you are simply trying to brazen your way out of what is being discussed by being smarmy ~ but are doing so in the most clumsy and blatant way.