@dj2becker saidDownload the image and open it with the appropriate tool (e.g., "WhatFormat" header decoder) and look for the characteristic AdopePhotoshop file header ahead of the jpeg or png header. An unmanipulated screenshot will not have this additional header, just the jpeg or png header.
How would you know if the screenshot was photoshopped?
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Other-Programming-Files/WhatFormat.shtml
16 Oct 18
@moonbus saidPardon my ignorance but do you believe there is absolutely no way the additional AdobePhotoshop file header can be removed?
Download the image and open it with the appropriate tool (e.g., "WhatFormat" header decoder) and look for the characteristic AdopePhotoshop file header ahead of the jpeg or png header. An unmanipulated screenshot will not have this additional header, just the jpeg or png header.
16 Oct 18
@dj2becker saidYour rhetorcial questions are absurd. My comment was not meant to be exhaustive; only one example which bears directly on allegations made earlier in this thread. If I do not list every line not to be crossed, do not assume that I condone crossing every line not explicitly listed.
Attacking parties who do have their own accounts here and can defend themselves is ok? Do you think it's ok to tell someone on here that they suffer from Autism?
@moonbus saidWhat about the specific example I made about a disability? Do you believe that would be crossing a line? A certain person here thinks it's ok.
Your rhetorcial questions are absurd. My comment was not meant to be exhaustive; only one example which bears directly on allegations made earlier in this thread. If I do not list every line not to be crossed, do not assume that I condone crossing every line not explicitly listed.
16 Oct 18
@moonbus saidWhat if you take a screenshot of an already photoshopped image?
Download the image and open it with the appropriate tool (e.g., "WhatFormat" header decoder) and look for the characteristic AdopePhotoshop file header ahead of the jpeg or png header. An unmanipulated screenshot will not have this additional header, just the jpeg or png header.
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Other-Programming-Files/WhatFormat.shtml
@dj2becker saidI'm not qualified to diagnose autism but I am well aware of the behavioural traits of both autism and the less debilitating asperger's syndrome.
Do you think it's ok to tell someone on here that they suffer from Autism?
I raised it with you because of the way you were behaving when you were repeating the same already-answered question over and over and over and over again and even claimed that me refusing to answer it was me trolling you!
Not a normal piece of interpersonal interaction between adults by any means. And it went on for months. You even changed your account so you could resume trolling me by making me think you were someone different when I'd given up on "Fetchmyjunk".
I was under the impression you subsequently went to see a neurologist about it but got the all clear. I'm not sure whether to believe you but if you did get a clean bill of health, good for you.
There must be some other explanation, then, for your troll-like combination of stalking of/obsession with me [and a couple of others, but with me in particular], your refusal to process any answers you get, and a really odd sense of entitlement that is presumptuous to a degree not normally seen in an adult.
Maybe the explanation is more straightforward than "autism". Maybe you're just a complete jerk and a manchild.
16 Oct 18
@fmf saidLol, more underhanded insults. Have I touched a nerve? I asked moonbus a question, give him a chance to respond before butting in.
I'm not qualified to diagnose autism but I am well aware of the behavioural traits of both autism and the less debilitating asperger's syndrome.
I raised it with you because of the way you were behaving when you were repeating the same already-answered question over and over and over and over again and even claimed that me refusing to answer it was me trolling you!
Not a ...[text shortened]... explanation is more straightforward than "autism". Maybe you're just a complete jerk and a manchild.
@dj2becker saidThe suggestion that you are a complete jerk and manchild is not an "underhand" insult. It's an unequivocal insult, and intended to be so. If you really think the explanation I gave about the issue of autism as it might apply to you is intended as an "insult", and seek to dismiss my candour in that way, then I think it's just more evidence that you are a complete jerk and manchild.
Lol, more underhanded insults. Have I touched a nerve?
@dj2becker saidIf moonbus doesn't give you an answer you agree with, and you then just keep asking him the same question over and over and over and over again and follow him over to the General Forum, and then follow him back here, thread after thread after thread, month after month, it may just affect his answer to your question about autism.
I asked moonbus a question, give him a chance to respond before butting in.
@fmf saidOh dear. Do you have something against people with Autism?
The suggestion that you are a complete jerk and manchild is not an "underhand" insult. It's an unequivocal insult, and intended to be so. If you really think the explanation I gave about the issue of autism as it might apply to you is intended as an "insult", and seek to dismiss my candour in that way, then I think it's just more evidence that you are a complete jerk and manchild.
@dj2becker saidOK, good. You've read the long one explaining the autism reference. And you've read the short one that explains why you strike me as a complete jerk and manchild. So, now you cannot pretend you have not read these explanations and then ask me questions about what I think over and over and over and over again.
Oh dear.
@dj2becker saidNo. Not at all.
Do you have something against people with Autism?
Why were you so aghast when asked if you were autistic? Why do you see it as an insult?
16 Oct 18
@fmf saidOh the irony. I was talking to moonbus.
OK, good. You've read the long one explaining the autism reference. And you've read the short one that explains why you strike me as a complete jerk and manchild. So, now you cannot pretend you have not read these explanations and then ask me questions about what I think over and over and over and over again.
16 Oct 18
@fmf said@fmf said
I'm not qualified to diagnose autism but I am well aware of the behavioural traits of both autism and the less debilitating asperger's syndrome.
I raised it with you because of the way you were behaving when you were repeating the same already-answered question over and over and over and over again and even claimed that me refusing to answer it was me trolling you!
Not a ...[text shortened]... explanation is more straightforward than "autism". Maybe you're just a complete jerk and a manchild.
I'm not qualified to diagnose autism
What then gives you the right to tell someone they are suffering from Autism?