1 edit
Originally posted by Zahlanziyou have been reading too much John Calvin, he was also against drinking whisky and dancing.
so one should have no problem living alone, eating only the strictly necessary nutrients, never reading a book, never doing something fun or fulfilling.
it is just a matter of personal choice.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
1 edit
Originally posted by vivifyEven two years of marriage is awesome. It took about two years just to get to know each other. I mean the person who they REALLY are and not what you IMAGINED they were.
Wow. That's awesome.
About two years. But not all marriages are the same of course.
Congradulations.
- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYes, Mr. Carrobie, but the question is whether or not you feel the urge to engage in any kind of sexual activity. I find other men to be sexually unappealing, but if I was attracted sexually to men, and not women, who the hell are you to tell me that this would be a simple matter of choice for me? Also, I'll never understand this obsession with other people's sexual activities that people of abrahamistic faiths have. What do you stand to gain by denying others pleasure, when they harm no one? It's one thing to condemn pedophiles (like prophet Muhammad), or rapists (like Moses' army), but what two (or more) consenting adults do for their own personal pleasures should be of no concern to the rest of us.
I provided reason Mr Hess and as a man of reason and logic you know that the logic was unassailable and the facts incontrovertible. Anyone can choose to engage in any kind of sexual activity....
Also, it would be awesome to be turned on by beautiful, naked men. All I'd have to do then is look in the mi... Well, maybe that wouldn't work for me specifically, but, you know, if I was a hunk.
(Come to think of it, I seem to have unconsciously gone for boobs.)
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you could just choose to have sex with a man and do it then? You don't think you would have any problems rising to the occasion?
I provided reason Mr Hess and as a man of reason and logic you know that the logic was unassailable and the facts incontrovertible. Anyone can choose to engage in any kind of sexual activity and are in essence neither heterosexual nor homosexual. These appellations are useless façades for materialists to hang their latest fashionable pseudo-scientific theories upon. I reject them all and remain capable of rational thought.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
1 edit
Does anyone think seriously on the physiology of the male body and the female body to ascertain what nature seems to equip each for.
It is the physical design, the plumbing of the way the male and female body is that hints to the complementary functions they have.
Not going along with the physiological plumbing of the design is to kind of be "play acting" when it comes to sexual activity.
You may be a male craving for an intimate sexual relationship with another male or a woman craving for a sexual relationship with another woman. But this is a "Let's pretend" fantasizing as far as the physiology of the body nature has endowed each with.
The "plumbing" so to speak, agrees with male / female complimentary function.