01 Sep 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritNo, that's not true. You're using your own definitions for words like 'lease' and own'.
in the united states, it is truly private property, just not your private property in most cases. your property is a lease or rental.
how can you tell if you live in a leased property? ask yourself the question: do you have to pay anyone for the right to stay in that property (eg: property taxes, mortgage payments)? and if you don't pay it, can they ...[text shortened]... like "eminent domain" )?
if the answer is yes, someone else owns the property you live in.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by rwingettI'm not willing to go back to the technological dark ages in some vain hope of attaining utopia.
When people like you finally recognize that capitalism is the handiwork of the devil, endless possibilities open up.
But you don't need to look far to see a ready made template for the Kingdom in action. I'm sure you've heard me talk on this forum about the Hutterites before. They're an Anabaptist sect similar to the Amish, but they practice a complete ...[text shortened]... Canada. If it is possible for anyone to be "god's chosen people", I believe they are it.
I miss the old atheistic rwingett.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by SwissGambitSorry to disappoint you, but I find as much entertainment in tweaking the noses of the atheist crowd these days as I do those of the theists. The fact of the matter is that my dislike for capitalist consumerism greatly outweighs my dislike for religion. I consider a Christian like Martin Luther King, Jr. to be infinitely preferable to an atheist like Ayn Rand.
I'm not willing to go back to the technological dark ages in some vain hope of attaining utopia.
I miss the old atheistic rwingett.
But I don't believe in the god of the Hutterites anymore than I do in that of any of the other Christian denominations. That notwithstanding, however, the Hutterites have undeniably used their faith to build a model of social relations. One that is free from all the exploitation, oppression and artificially enforced scarcity of the rest of the world. Plus their lifestyle, unlike our technologically profligate one, is sustainable. They aren't running the ecosystem into the ground for the sake of a cheap dollar. And unlike the Amish, the Hutterites do not reject technology outright. They do use quite a bit more of it, while still managing to avoid falling into the endless pit of materialistic consumerism (which seems to be the inevitable outcome for secular societies).
I'm not suggesting that everyone should become a Hutterite. But it's possible their template of a propertyless, communal lifestyle could be successfully modified for use by society at large. The question seems to be whether a much more heterogeneous population could pull off the same level of cooperation. My hunch is that they could. It certainly couldn't be any worse than the pathetic debacle that unrestrained capitalism has brought into being.
Originally posted by rwingettCapitalism is not the problem. The problem is the capitalist Pig, the communist Pig, the socialist Pig, any of the other greedy Pigs of any other system.
Sorry to disappoint you, but I find as much entertainment in tweaking the noses of the atheist crowd these days as I do those of the theists. The fact of the matter is that my dislike for capitalist consumerism greatly outweighs my dislike for religion. I consider a Christian like Martin Luther King, Jr. to be infinitely preferable to an atheist like Ayn Ra ...[text shortened]... be any worse than the pathetic debacle that unrestrained capitalism has brought into being.
01 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsCapitalism is a system that actively encourages people to be Pigs. In fact, the more porcine their behavior, the greater the rewards. It's not difficult to see why so many people behave that way when the very system itself is loaded with incentives for them to do so.
Capitalism is not the problem. The problem is the capitalist Pig, the communist Pig, the socialist Pig, any of the other greedy Pigs of any other system.
The Hutterite system, by contrast, has no outlet for porcine behavior. There is no avenue for people to behave like Pigs. The system is loaded with disincentives for that type of behavior. As a consequence, their society does not produce Pigs.
If you do not want a society of Pigs, then don't place people into a set of social relations that actively encourages their porcinification.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by SwissGambityou do not own any property from which someone else can have you removed. the person or people who have that power own your property. you lease it from them. that's about as simple as this concept can be stated.
No, that's not true. You're using your own definitions for words like 'lease' and own'.
now let's look at an example.
A lease is a contractual arrangement calling for the lessee (user) to pay the lessor (owner) for use of an asset.
if you have a contract with the federal, state or municipal government which requires you to pay them an annual (or other payment arrangement) fee for the use of the property in which you reside then:
they are the lessor; they own the property if they can withhold the property from you for failure to pay for the use of the property.
and you are the lessee, or user of the property and you have to pay for the right to use it.
these are not my definitions for 'lease' and 'own'
Originally posted by rwingettBut if a person is a Christian capitalist, he can earn more so he can help society in general, with more jobs, and more charity. Christ was demonstrating capitalism in the parable of the talents. The servant that did not invest his talent to earn more was condemned.
Capitalism is a system that actively encourages people to be Pigs. In fact, the more porcine their behavior, the greater the rewards. It's not difficult to see why so many people behave that way when the very system itself is loaded with incentives for them to do so.
The Hutterite system, by contrast, has no outlet for porcine behavior. There is no aven ...[text shortened]... 't place people into a set of social relations that actively encourages their porcinification.
In the USA the Democratic Party is more on your side against capitalism than the Republican Party. The democrats do not understand that hurting the business also hurst the nation as a whole. They want to unfairly tax them, which hurts their investment prospects. The Republicans realize that Christian run businesses will generate more wealth that will benefit everyone by providing jobs and more capital for more investment and charitable donations that will help the whole society. The democrats are basically telling the people that they don't have to work if they don't want to because we will take money from the rich and give to your lazy asses.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by rwingettI'm a little surprised that directive blame was your first response to my fair question about how you think your utopian sharing society might come into being.
Don't play games, Divegeester. If you want to have a discussion, then do it. But quit grasping for excuses to duck out while pretending that your 'honor' has been affronted.
Your second response was to quote Biblical scripture; if you think religion is the route to your vision then fine; if not, then stop "playing games" yourself and answer the question.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by divegeester😴
I'm a little surprised that directive blame was your first response to my fair question about how you think your utopian sharing society might come into being.
Your second response was to quote Biblical scripture; if you think religion is the route to your vision then fine; if not, then stop "playing games" yourself and answer the question.
Originally posted by RJHindsChristianity and capitalism are wholly incompatible. Or they would be if Christianity actually had anything to do with what Jesus said.
But if a person is a Christian capitalist, he can earn more so he can help society in general, with more jobs, and more charity. Christ was demonstrating capitalism in the parable of the talents. The servant that did not invest his talent to earn more was condemned.
In the USA the Democratic Party is more on your side against capitalism than the Republi rk if they don't want to because we will take money from the rich and give to your lazy asses.
Your wrangling between Republicans and Democrats is the type of outmoded thinking that keeps people locked into a system where only the interests of the ruling elite are represented. You have to leave that behind and realize that change does not come through the political system. The Kingdom cannot be legislated into existence. In fact, just as there are no politics in Hutterite society, there will be no politics in the Kingdom. Politics are only necessary for a fallen and iniquitous world.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by divegeesterI believe rwingett is thinking in his mind -- divegeester is not the boss of me and I don't have to answer the question.
I'm a little surprised that directive blame was your first response to my fair question about how you think your utopian sharing society might come into being.
Your second response was to quote Biblical scripture; if you think religion is the route to your vision then fine; if not, then stop "playing games" yourself and answer the question.
01 Sep 12
Originally posted by rwingettA Kingdom will not work without a perfect King and there is no perfect King on Earth. All Kingdoms have failed to create a perfect society and the Kingdom of Satan will not be able to do it either.
Christianity and capitalism are wholly incompatible. Or they would be if Christianity actually had anything to do with what Jesus said.
Your wrangling between Republicans and Democrats is the type of outmoded thinking that keeps people locked into a system where only the interests of the ruling elite are represented. You have to leave that behind and re ...[text shortened]... ll be no politics in the Kingdom. Politics are only necessary for a fallen and iniquitous world.