Go back
For Rajk

For Rajk

Spirituality

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1
Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @fmf
Because dj2becker's speculation about events decades ago, deployed as forum banter, was completely lacking in common decency.

divegeester not being phased by the depths that a poster like dj2becker would go to, does not affect the indecency of dj2becker's post.
You being the arbiter of what constitutes common decency is quite indecent.

And your new avatar pic is a disaster.

Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

-Removed-
I’ll tell you when you’re not slamming the sauce.

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1
Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1
Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-2

Originally posted by @romans1009
You being the arbiter of what constitutes common decency is quite indecent.
Not at all. We are all independent personally responsible moral agents and if you and I disagree about the decency - or the lack thereof - of what dj2becker did, then that is par for the course on a debate and discussion forum like this one. If you find my objection "indecent" then it's fine for you to say that.

Clock
Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @fmf
Not at all. We are all independent personally responsible moral agents and if you and I disagree about the decency - or the lack thereof - of what dj2becker did, then that is par for the course on a debate and discussion forum like this one. If you find my objection "indecent" then it's fine for you to say that.
We disagree on the intent behind what he did. You said he had ill intent; I disagree.

You obviously had ill intent in bringing all this up again.

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @romans1009
We disagree on the intent behind what he did. You said he had ill intent; I disagree. You obviously had ill intent in bringing all this up again.
My intent is to set dj2becker straight and to confront you for your endorsement of an infamous poster who has only posted a couple a hundred times since you arrived. If you both raise the level of banter-decency even just a tad, my intent will have borne fruit.

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @fmf
My intent is to set dj2becker straight and to confront you for your endorsement of an infamous poster who has only posted a couple a hundred times since you arrived. If you both raise the level of banter-decency even just a tad, my intent will have borne fruit.
I’m not endorsing anyone. I just said I don’t think he had ill intent in mentioning it but I also said it would have been better for him to pm me if he thought I needed to know that information.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @romans1009
I’m not endorsing anyone. I just said I don’t think he had ill intent in mentioning it but I also said it would have been better for him to pm me if he thought I needed to know that information.
It's about as obvious a case of "trolling" ~ and way, way more serious than anything you have called "trolling" that's been aimed at you, by far ~ as one could possibly get.

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @fmf
It's about as obvious a case of "trolling" ~ and way, way more serious than anything you have called "trolling" that's been aimed at you, by far ~ as one could possibly get.
It again goes to intent. I don’t think his purpose in bringing it up was to troll. I think it was to give me a broader perspective on dive’s posting behavior and make me aware of an area I should avoid.

Telling me via a pm would have been better, but maybe he knew it didn’t bother dive (as you already said that it doesn’t bother dive.)

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @romans1009
It again goes to intent.
I've known the widely reviled dj2becker for longer than you. The intent was to deliver just about the most obvious kind of "trolling" that one could possibly see.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by @romans1009
I think it was to give me a broader perspective on dive’s posting behavior and make me aware of an area I should avoid.
What "broader perspective" is that then? Tell us about it.

Clock
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-3

For the record, my intention was not to troll Dive but rather to encourage Romans to cut him some slack for his behavior in light of something that Dive himself had shared here prior to Romans arrival.

Clock
2 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
My intent is to set dj2becker straight and to confront you for your endorsement of an infamous poster who has only posted a couple a hundred times since you arrived. If you both raise the level of banter-decency even just a tad, my intent will have borne fruit.
Hold on you want to set me straight on forum etiquette after claiming I was psychologically abused and autistic, multiple times? You must be the biggest joker on the planet.

I bet you're going to say people need to call things as they see them as part of your excuse.

You have no shame.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.