Go back

"Former Christians"

Spirituality

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Do you believe in evil-lution?
Of course not...Why would you ask such a silly question?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by checkbaiter
I don't know if there is such a thing as "former Christian". Once some one has received Christ, 1 John says it is "seed". Like a natural birth is by seed, so is the spiritual birth by spiritual seed. You cannot get "unborn"... you can however be out of fellowship with God if one continues in the ways of the world and turns away from God. However his stat ...[text shortened]... If what you are looking for is the question of losing one's salvation, I would say no...
Well, you seem to be dancing around the point. From what I can tell, the point of this thread seems to be that 'former Christians' were never 'real' Christians.

You provided the following as a definition of a 'real' Christian.
"A real Christian is known by the fruit he/she manifests...Love, Joy, peace,faith, gentleness, etc....the fruits of the spirit are found in Galations."

You seem to have backpedalled since then.

Now either you believe that the above defines a 'real' Christian or you don't. Either you believe that 'former Christians' can have been 'real' Christians or you don't.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
No

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Well, you seem to be dancing around the point. From what I can tell, the point of this thread seems to be that 'former Christians' were never 'real' Christians.

You provided the following as a definition of a 'real' Christian.
"A real Christian is known by the fruit he/she manifests...Love, Joy, peace,faith, gentleness, etc....the fruits of the spiri ...[text shortened]... u believe that 'former Christians' can have been 'real' Christians or you don't.
My apologies, I should have said a "walking Christian" can be defined by their fruit.
I do not believe in a former Christian, for reasons I have already explained.
What you call a former Christian, is still a real Christian. I hope that clears up what I believe the bible to state.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Penguin

My definition of a Christian is somebody who firmly believes in the following:
- Jesus Christ was the son of the one and only God.
- He was crucified and rose again
- Faith in him can ensure us an afterlife

I know of someone elsewhere on the Net who would sign off on those three things. He also claims the following:

* Calvinism has no Biblical basis.

* The Trinity is a false doctrine.

* The black-letter parts of the Bible have errors.

* Said errors were deliberately planted there by God as a test to see who would stay true to the red-letter words of Jesus.

True Christian or not?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by checkbaiter
What you call a former Christian, is still a real Christian.
Does this concept of yours apply to a 'former Muslim' still being a 'real Muslim', and a 'former Jew' still being a 'real Jew' and so on and so forth?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Does this concept of yours apply to a 'former Muslim' still being a 'real Muslim', and a 'former Jew' still being a 'real Jew' and so on and so forth?
No

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by checkbaiter
No
So I take it you'll concede that your analysis is something purely subjective and partisan and does not affect the reality experienced by a "former Christian" or the "former" devotee of any religion?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
So I take it you'll concede that your analysis is something purely subjective and partisan and does not affect the reality experienced by a "former Christian" or the "former" devotee of any religion?
I have merely paraphrased what the bible says, your interpretation of what I said is your choice.🙂

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by checkbaiter
I have merely paraphrased what the bible says, your interpretation of what I said is your choice.🙂
Sure thing, but you cannot abdicate responsibility for the substance of what you profess to believe. You either understand and stand up for what you say you believe or you don't; you can't simply palm it off as something you read in a book. 🙂

Say you believe X but I do not believe X.

Now, you insist that you can somehow superimpose X onto my reality: whether I like it or not, you reckon X applies to me and to all people like me.

If you were to stop believing X, would you believe and accept that X still applies to you in reality, even though you no longer believe X?

And (bonus question) if you were to stop believing X after believing it for decades, would it be true (to your way of thinking) if others [who continue to believe X] were say that you had never believed X?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Sure thing, but you cannot abdicate responsibility for the substance of what you profess to believe. You either understand and stand up for what you say you believe or you don't; you can't simply palm it off as something you read in a book. 🙂

Say you believe X but I do not believe X.

Now, you insist that you can somehow superimpose X onto my reali ...[text shortened]... way of thinking) if others [who continue to believe X] were say that you had never believed X?
Perhaps you would get an answer if you would explain what this X is. 😏

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by checkbaiter
Of course not...Why would you ask such a silly question?
I just wanted to get a better idea of which side you were on.

Clock

Originally posted by FMF
So you reckon a Christian who abandons or renounces his or her faith - stops believing - is a Christian "forever" nevertheless?
Yes.
The work is His.
The glory is His.
We just get the toppings.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Yes.
The work is His.
The glory is His.
We just get the toppings.
If people like you who believe in "the toppings" think you get "the toppings" then I think that is just fine. What I don't really get is how you can seriously think it applies to people who think "the toppings" are a figment of your imagination. Are you willing to concede that you making these kinds of assertions might possibly have nothing to do with me and that it's instead about you geeing yourself [like sonship seems to do], and signalling the degree of "certainty" you feel, both to likeminded people, and to those who are nonplussed by it?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.