Forum etiquette

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
just for future reference can you acknowledge that there is a forum for drool and slobber and this aint it.

tell me robbie, how is george going to manage on here without lennie? i bet george is secretly happy that he no longer has to clean up the mess left by lennie.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
just for future reference can you acknowledge that there is a forum for drool and slobber and this aint it.

Robbie, stop it.

Your loyalty to Galveston as a fellow JW is admirable, but you need to take a step back, reflect and consolidate the reality of what my complaint with his posting etiquette actually consists of. You need to recognise that persistence is not harassment, that perceiving that 'persistence' as 'persecution' is incorrect and therefore not a validation that you are suffering for Christ or for Jehovah or whatever. You are just pissing people off, that's all.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
tell me robbie, how is george going to manage on here without lennie? i bet george is secretly happy that he no longer has to clean up the mess left by lennie.

Can you cite anyone else that your friend has singled out as a special object of his attention? Lets see there are more than roughly 41,000 Christian denominations some of which are represented here, yet he consistently has chosen to target Jehovahs Witnesses as is evidenced by the content of threads that he starts against them publicly admitting that he loaths the organisation.

Secondly he has singled out two individuals myself and Galveston who by mere coincidence also happen to be Jehovahs Witnesses when there are many other contributors from many other denominations that he can examine, enquire about their facebook pages, enquire what they are doing when they are not logged on here, when they have made their chess moves etc yet he seems to have limited his perspective solely to Jehovahs witnesses, can you explain this disparity for it appears to me and I would suggest to anyone capable of rational thought that he has singled out and specifically targeted Jehovahs Witness. Will you explain the phenomena?

Originally posted by divegeester
Robbie, stop it.

Your loyalty to Galveston as a fellow JW is admirable, but you need to take a step back, reflect and consolidate the reality of what my complaint with his posting etiquette actually consists of. You need to recognise that persistence is not harassment, that perceiving that 'persistence' as 'persecution' is incorrect and therefore no ...[text shortened]... e suffering for Christ or for Jehovah or whatever. You are just pissing people off, that's all.

'take a step back, reflect'......dive you do know who you are talking to, dont you? robbie doesnt even reflect when he looks in a mirror.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Can you cite anyone else that your friend has singled out as a special object of his attention? Lets see there are more than roughly 41,000 Christian denominations some of which are represented here, yet he consistently has chosen to target Jehovahs Witnesses as is evidenced by the content of threads that he starts against them publicly admitting th ...[text shortened]... he has singled out and specifically targeted Jehovahs Witness. Will you explain the phenomena?

I've never been a "phenomena" before!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Can you cite anyone else that your friend has singled out as a special object of his attention? Lets see there are more than roughly 41,000 Christian denominations some of which are represented here, yet he consistently has chosen to target Jehovahs Witnesses as is evidenced by the content of threads that he starts against them publicly admitting th ...[text shortened]... he has singled out and specifically targeted Jehovahs Witness. Will you explain the phenomena?

i argue with you waaaaaay more than i do with anybody else on here. so, am i harassing you?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
i argue with you waaaaaay more than i do with anybody else on here. so, am i harassing you?

why dont you just try to answer the question, how many other denominations and individuals has your friend singled out for his special attention, how hard can it be? All you need to do is name one or two?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why dont you just try to answer the question, how many other denominations and individuals has your friend singled out for his special attention, how hard can it be? All you need to do is name one or two?

This thread is not a "denominational" issue, it's a forum etiquette issue.

Sorry if I'm missing your point.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why dont you just try to answer the question, how many other denominations and individuals has your friend singled out for his special attention, how hard can it be? All you need to do is name one or two?

you are missing the point (probably on purpose). i dont argue with any of the other 41,000 denominations either. just as dive argues with you and glav, so do i. i would say its because you encompass nearly all of the christian opinions that i strongly disagree with. you are also very vocal about these opinions, where the majority of christians on here are reluctant to 'get into it' or are moderate to liberal and dont share your extreme views.
now you dont accuse me of having a vendetta against jw's despite the fact that i am against a lot of what you think, but you accuse dive of having a vendetta for being against you.........so, what is it? can you put a finger it?? is it the amount of posts??? is it because he is persistent....is it because he hits a nerve?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
you are missing the point (probably on purpose). i dont argue with any of the other 41,000 denominations either. just as dive argues with you and glav, so do i. i would say its because you encompass nearly all of the christian opinions that i strongly disagree with. you are also very vocal about these opinions, where the majority of christians on here a ...[text shortened]... ?? is it the amount of posts??? is it because he is persistent....is it because he hits a nerve?

Can you cite any other denominations or individuals whom he has regularly singled out as an object of his special attention, that is what you were actually asked. If you cannot or will not then I put it to you that he has specifically targeted the denomination of Jehovahs Witness and those individuals who profess that particular belief. All you need to do is cite any other organisation that he has launched caustic attacks against or any other individuals other than robbie carrobie and galveston that he has named personally in his posts.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Can you cite any other denominations or individuals whom he has regularly singled out as an object of his special attention, that is what you were actually asked. If you cannot or will not then I put it to you that he has specifically targeted the denomination of Jehovahs Witness and those individuals who profess that particular belief. All you need ...[text shortened]... individuals other than robbie carrobie and galveston that he has named personally in his posts.

Sorry to butt in. There are no other "denominations" posting in the volume and self acclaimed veracity that you and Galveston do. This makes you circumstantial, not special. If the Mormons were here doing what you guys so, I'd give them the gears also.

You are not special. You're just happen to be in the firing zone.

Sorry to disappoint...

Originally posted by divegeester
Sorry to butt in. There are no other "denominations" posting in the volume and self acclaimed veracity that you and Galveston do. This makes you circumstantial, not special. If the Mormons were here doing what you guys so, I'd give them the gears also.

You are not special. You're just happen to be in the firing zone.

Sorry to disappoint...

can you point to a single thread in the entire first page that I have started, no neither can I making your assertion of volume nothing more than a bare faced lie. Galveston has started two, again making your assertion of volume a bare faced lie.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Can you cite any other denominations or individuals whom he has regularly singled out as an object of his special attention, that is what you were actually asked. If you cannot or will not then I put it to you that he has specifically targeted the denomination of Jehovahs Witness and those individuals who profess that particular belief.

again you are missing the point. i will try and be a bit more direct this time.

maybe he, just as i do direct his attention on you because your beliefs are particularly repugnant.

how many of the other christian groups are as equally extreme as you guys and equally as vocal on this forum?

there is nothing wrong with targeting a group. if doenst make it harassing. if this was a political forum, i would be focusing all my attention on arguing with bnp representatives. that doent mean i am harassing members of the bmp. it means i disagree with what the represent and want to prove they are wrong.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
again you are missing the point. i will try and be a bit more direct this time.

maybe he, just as i do direct his attention on you because your beliefs are particularly repugnant.

how many of the other christian groups are as equally extreme as you guys and equally as vocal on this forum?

there is nothing wrong with targeting a group. if doenst ...[text shortened]... embers of the bmp. it means i disagree with what the represent and want to prove they are wrong.

you were not asked to comment on our beliefs in comparison to others, you were not even asked to provide a reason for the phenomena of why he may specifically target Jehovah witnesses. What you were actually asked and this makes the third or fourth time was can you cite any other denomination or individuals whom your friend has targeted as an object of his special attention and the answer is no you cannot. Therefore the assertion of singling out and targeting a specific denomination and specific individuals stands.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
can you point to a single thread in the entire first page that I have started, no neither can I making your assertion of volume nothing more than a bare faced lie. Galveston has started two, again making your assertion of volume a bare faced lie.

You have 2489 pages of posting history. That is a huge amount. Galveston has 689.