Go back
Forum etiquette

Forum etiquette

Spirituality

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
If there was a galveston75 figure at your Kingdom Hall who sent secret sexual slurs and threats in a message, would you expect the recipient to keep it secret? If the sexual content was aimed at a youth, would your secrecy rule still apply?
What transpires between other people is their affair, sexual slurs is your version, Galveston has his version, indeed, if I recall correctly the reason that he made those statements was that you were harassing him (sadly an ongoing issue here) and he simply stated that he was not gay and that you were to leave him alone.

I also resent your inclusion and rather insidious introduction of sexual slurs and youth for i recall quite clearly how you resented another poster accusing you of pedophilia and rightly so, so lets just stick to the facts, shall we.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Even if I, sonship, RJHinds and Grampy Bobby have written more text than you down through the years, 37,335 posts is still "voluminous" posting. And you ought to take back the "barefaced lie" accusation you made.
no chance, nevah! number of posts is not equivalent to volume as I have empirically and scientifically proven and if I take it back I can only do so partially for it cannot apply to Galveston who was also included.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
What transpires between other people is their affair, sexual slurs is your version, Galveston has his version, indeed, if I recall correctly the reason that he made those statements was they you were harassing him (sadly an ongoing issue here) and he simply stated that he was not gay and that you you were to leave him alone.

I also resent your i ...[text shortened]... her poster accusing you of pedophilia and rightly so, so lets just stick to the facts, shall we.
Everybody I forwarded that galveston75 PM to read the sexual slurs and threats for themselves. So it's not just me. He sent me a derogatory PM mentioning homosexual acts and about getting me banned from the web site because he did not like my line of questioning in the forum.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I also resent your inclusion and rather insidious introduction of sexual slurs and youth for i recall quite clearly how you resented another poster accusing you of pedophilia and rightly so, so lets just stick to the facts, shall we.
You are missing the point. You have suggested that threatening messages with sexual content should be kept secret by the recipient. Do you also apply this 'principle' elsewhere? Do you apply it to your goings on at your Kingdom Hall?

Great King Rat
Infidel

Joined
24 Apr 10
Moves
15242
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Even if I, sonship, RJHinds and Grampy Bobby have written more text than you down through the years, 37,335 posts is still "voluminous" posting. And you ought to take back the "barefaced lie" accusation you made.
Welcome back, FMF ;-)

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no chance, nevah! number of posts is not equivalent to volume as I have empirically and scientifically proven and if I take it back I can only do so partially for it cannot apply to Galveston who was also included.
Who ~ if anyone ~ has been more voluminous in their posting than you? Name a few if you can. Yours is 37,300+. Can you think of anyone who has a higher volume of posts than that?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Everybody I forwarded that galveston75 PM to read the sexual slurs and threats for themselves. So it's not just me. He sent me a derogatory PM mentioning homosexual acts and about getting me banned from the web site because he did not like my line of questioning in the forum.
Ok but when someone feels threatened they often resort to drastic measures. Perhaps if you had not harassed him FMF with your line of questioning it may not have transpired for no one likes to be cornered with no way out. Perhaps it was due to your persistent nature, your legendary dogged determination, it is possible that it could have been construed as something else, especially from someone who did not know you. I am not attempting to make excuses but if you dont harass people they are unlike to send you messages telling you where to get off.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Who ~ if anyone ~ has been more voluminous in their posting than you? Name a few if you can. Yours is 37,300+. Can you think of anyone who has a higher volume of posts than that?
I have many posts its true, I am legend robbie2great4sure, but they do not equate to actual volume of text.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Welcome back, FMF ;-)
Thanks. I was "Nick Bouraki" there for a while, the screen name of "Duchess64" when he posted at another chess web site.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Welcome back, FMF ;-)
yeah the ol codger has life in him yet, i kinda missed him, he never even said goodbye as well despite our many jousts! I did leave a message on his music page though thanking him for the good times 😀

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have many posts its true, I am legend robbie2great4sure, but they do not equate to actual volume of text.
You should retract the "barefaced lie" accusation then.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
You should retract the "barefaced lie" accusation then.
no i should not because number of posts does not equate to actual volume of text plus it does not apply in Galvestons case.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yeah the ol codger has life in him yet, i kinda missed him, he never even said goodbye as well despite our many jousts! I did leave a message on his music page though thanking him for the good times 😀
Never got any message from you. I didn't say goodbye when I went on my hiatus because I think of you as a poisonous and deceitful poster. I bade farewell to plenty of other people, though. Plenty of worthwhile people here, for sure. 😀

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no i should not because number of posts does not equate to actual volume of text plus it does not apply in Galvestons case.
But saying 37,300+ texts is "voluminous posting" is simply not a lie, barefaced or otherwise.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
24 Mar 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Never got any message from you. I didn't say goodbye when I went on my hiatus because I think of you as a poisonous and deceitful poster. I bade farewell to plenty of other people, though. Plenty of worthwhile people here, for sure. 😀
ouch a poisonous and deceitful poster yet able to keep a private confidence, interesting.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.