24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhen galveston75 sent me that PM a year or so ago with bizarre sexual slurs and a threat, he then lied about its content in public when I confronted him, so I just forwarded the PM to about a dozen forum regulars, which rather put galveston75 in a pickle. Didn't you also claim to have read it at the time?
correspondence that Jehovahs witness have been the subject of forum bullying and no I cannot nor will not reveal the identity of the person who sent it to me. Everyone else? who else reads this stuff?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI am not talking about quality of posts. I am talking about quantity of posts. 37,335 posts is "voluminous" posting, wriggle as you may. 🙂
grandpa bobby posts quality not quantity. once again attempting to utilize number of posts is no indication of actual volume, as if ten small bottles are equivalent to a single bottle producing factory. So sad for you.
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by FMFperhaps its rather vague but i resent your forwarding of private texts for it proves that you cannot be trusted to keep a confidentiality.
When galveston75 sent me that PM a year or so ago with bizarre sexual slurs and a threat, he then lied about its content in public when I confronted him, so I just forwarded the PM to about a dozen forum regulars, which rather put galveston75 in a pickle. Didn't you also claim to have read it at the time?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by FMFI am not wriggling FMF I have empirically proven that volume does not equate with number of posts, that you find it hard to accept the matter is your affair.
I am not talking about quality of posts. I am talking about quantity of posts. 37,335 posts is "voluminous" posting, wriggle as you may. 🙂
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by FMFI dont think anything about them, I simply dont trust you, you have proven that you cannot be trusted to keep a confidence as evidenced by your forwarding private messages and if you cannot be trusted with that what else can you be trusted with?
So you think galveston75's sexual insults should have been kept secret?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you reckon I should have kept his "private" sexual insults secret to protect him form being criticized for send me a PM like that?
I dont think anything about them, I simply dont trust you, you have proven that you cannot be trusted to keep a confidence as evidenced by your forwarding private messages and if you cannot be trusted with that what else can you be trusted with?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf there was a galveston75 figure at your Kingdom Hall who sent secret sexual slurs and threats in a message, would you expect the recipient to keep it secret? If the sexual content was aimed at a youth, would your secrecy rule still apply?
I dont think anything about them FMF, sorry.
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEven if I, sonship, RJHinds and Grampy Bobby have written more text than you down through the years, 37,335 posts is still "voluminous" posting. And you ought to take back the "barefaced lie" accusation you made.
not only is it in dispute its been empirically proven to be a very dubious model.