Forum etiquette

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what transpires in a private message between me and anyone else is none of your business, suffice to say, they brought the matter of Internet bullying on your part ti my attention, which i I were you i would take seriously, for its a serious accusation.

I'm afraid that without the evidence of the actual PM in question that indeed your claim that it exists does not suffice. If find you difficult to take seriously at the best of times robbie; in this comedic episode it is impossible to view your childish protestations with any credulity.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
on the contrary you followed him from thread to thread, making disparaging comments about his inability to post due to his parents health infact uyou accused him of lying about it, you started a thread to highlight his deficiencies under the guise of forum etiquette, so we shall ask you once again, do you think your actions here have contributed to his enjoyment or otherwise of this site, third time asking.

There you go again, summarising something completely unsubstantiated. Please refer to the evidence if you have any. All my posts are in the public domain, please feel free to point to them specifically.

Originally posted by divegeester
I'm afraid that without the evidence of the actual PM in question that indeed your claim that it exists does not suffice. If find you difficult to take seriously at the best of times robbie; in this comedic episode it is impossible to view your childish protestations with any credulity.

No what is actually real is that I have a correspondence that alleges Internet bullying against Jehovah witness of which you are a part, now you can continue to deny that the text exists or uyou can accept that it does and that you have engaged in Internet bullying, either way, if it comes to the crunch, I have a n text from an independent observer, you have nothing other than some unsubstantiated claims based on nothing but a supposition that the text does not exist.

Originally posted by divegeester
There you go again, summarising something completely unsubstantiated. Please refer to the evidence if you have any. All my posts are in the public domain, please feel free to point to them specifically.

I will now ask you for the fifth time, do you think your action here contributed to Galveston's enjoyment of the site or otherwise?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I dont care whether you believe me or not, i have the correspondence. Yes I understand that you have no way of knowing what I have received and therefore its your word against mine.

It not your word against mine as I'm not defending myself to anyone robbie, there is no one standing here to whom I have to defend myself against. Only you.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No what is actually real is that I have a correspondence that alleges Internet bullying against Jehovah witness of which you are a part, now you can continue to deny that the text exists or uyou can accept that it does and that you have engaged in Internet bullying, either way, if it comes to the crunch, I have a n text from an independent observer, ...[text shortened]... han some unsubstantiated claims based on nothing but a supposition that the text does not exist.

And what exactly are you going to do with this alleged private message?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No what is actually real is that I have a correspondence that alleges Internet bullying against Jehovah witness of which you are a part, now you can continue to deny that the text exists or uyou can accept that it does and that you have engaged in Internet bullying, either way, if it comes to the crunch, I have a n text from an independent observer, ...[text shortened]... han some unsubstantiated claims based on nothing but a supposition that the text does not exist.

When it comes to the "crunch"...what crunch is this then?

Originally posted by divegeester
It not your word against mine as I'm not defending myself to anyone robbie, there is no one standing here to whom I have to defend myself against. Only you.

fine but if it comes to the crunch just remember i have a piece of correspondence from a third party which alleges Internet bullying against Jehovah's witness of which you are a part.

Originally posted by divegeester
When it comes to the "crunch"...what crunch is this then?

If evidence needs to be produced for whatever reason.

Originally posted by divegeester
And what exactly are you going to do with this alleged private message?

I am going to sit on it and keep it and copy and paste it into my PC before it gets automatically deleted within thirty days, that is what I am going to do with it, thanks for asking.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I will now ask you for the fifth time, do you think your action here contributed to Galveston's enjoyment of the site or otherwise?

I don't remember you asking me this question, but time happy to answer it. I have no idea. Galveston is clearly an emotional chap who has on several well documented occasions left this site in a state of heightened drama, usually because he has painted himself into some sort of debating corner. I can't speak for his enjoyment of the site either way.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
fine but if it comes to the crunch just remember i have a piece of correspondence from a third party which alleges Internet bullying against Jehovah's witness of which you are a part.

But it's a private message robbie and as you have already said in this exchange, you will never reveal contents of a private message under any circumstances, right? So what can you do with it?

Originally posted by divegeester
I dint remember you asking me this question, but time happy to answer it. I have no idea. Galveston is clearly an emotional chap who has on several well documented occasions left this site in a state of heightened drama, usually because he has painted himself into some sort of debating corner. I can't speak for his enjoyment of the site either way.

Do you think that given that he is under stress due to his aging parents that stating that he was using their ill health as an excuse not to respond to your posts (its self an indication of your forcing him to act when he is under no duress to do so) contributed to his enjoyment of the site or otherwise.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If evidence needs to be produced for whatever reason.

But an (alleged) PM from someone sharing you point of view about something is not evidence that that something is what either of you say it is. You must realise that just because some shares your madness does not make you both sane?

Originally posted by divegeester
But it's a private message robbie and as you have already said in this exchange, you will never reveal contents of a private message under any circumstances, right? So what can you do with it?

I can keep it and sit on it knowing within myself that an independent third party has recognized that bullying of Jehovahs witnesses on this forum has taken place, of which you are a prime instigator, thats what i can do with it divesgeester.