Originally posted by divegeesterPerhaps but i doubt it for its a far cry from your tell us what the private correspondence said, i merely intimated its direction, not its specific content. Whether you have been contacted or not is meaningless, i have not protested to the moderators as i have absolutely no faith that they will act and i cannot say with any certainty whether anyone else has. That there is a private correspondence and it does relate to allegations of bullying on your part should have been related for it highlights that its not simply my perspective but that it has been noted by an independent third party , so i reject your claim that i should not have mentioned its existence.
But you have already revealed partially what this person said by telling the forum that they "encouraged" you to complain to the admins about my alleged bullying. Surely if it was private you should not be saying anything about it at all.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo one is going to "act" robbie; this is not a international political incident.
Perhaps but i doubt it for its a far cry from your tell us what the private correspondence said, i merely intimated its direction, not its specific content. Whether you have been contacted or not is meaningless, i have not protested to the moderators as i have absolutely no faith that they will act and i cannot say with any certainty whether anyone ...[text shortened]... independent third party , so i reject your claim that i should not have mentioned its existence.
Originally posted by divegeesterInternet bullying is serious matter divesgeester in fact children are educated about it at school. So let me ask you do you think your attacks on Galveston contributed to his enjoyment or lack of enjoyment of this site?
No one is going to "act" robbie; this is not a international political incident.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo, you have revealed that a poster sent you a private message "encouraging you to report me for bullying. The fact that this poster has not revealed this themselves indicates that they did not want you to discuss it at all. But now that you have broken that confidence why don't you just post all of the actual words of "encouragement" that you received from them. You don't have to say who it was and as you have already revealed the general content of the message there can be no harm in displaying the actual words.
Perhaps but i doubt it for its a far cry from your tell us what the private correspondence said, i merely intimated its direction, not its specific content. Whether you have been contacted or not is meaningless, i have not protested to the moderators as i have absolutely no faith that they will act and i cannot say with any certainty whether anyone ...[text shortened]... independent third party , so i reject your claim that i should not have mentioned its existence.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRobbie can you post one example of these alleged "attacks".
Internet bullying is serious matter divesgeester in fact children are educated about it at school. So let me ask you do you think your attacks on Galveston contributed to his enjoyment or lack of enjoyment of this site?
Originally posted by divegeesterI have not forwarded nor made any content of the text available and said nothing beyond that it encouraged me to report the matter to the moderators (not the actual terms used), so no i reject your claim of revealing a confidentiality. No its none of your business, get it, none of your business.
No, you have revealed that a poster sent you a private message "encouraging you to report me for bullying. The fact that this poster has not revealed this themselves indicates that they did not want you to discuss it at all. But now that you have broken that confidence why don't you just post all of the actual words of "encouragement" that you received f ...[text shortened]... revealed the general content of the message there can be no harm in displaying the actual words.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMurder is a serious issue to robbie carrobie, children are taught in school that murder is a bad thing. Stating that something is bad and that children are educated about it does not mean that it has happened. You really need to get a tighter grip on reality or at least come up with some evidence to support your claim.
Internet bullying is serious matter divesgeester in fact children are educated about it at school. So let me ask you do you think your attacks on Galveston contributed to his enjoyment or lack of enjoyment of this site?
Originally posted by divegeesterI have posted details already in this thread i will not do so again, what i will do is rephrase the question, do you think your correspondence with Galveston contributed to his enjoyment or lack of enjoyment of his use of this site.
Robbie can you post one example of these alleged "attacks".
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut it is every bit my business robbie as you have brought it into the public domain as claimed evidence that you are not alone in your charges against me. If you are going to bring it into the forum as evidence then we need to see it, otherwise people will think you are making it up or imagining it.
I have not forwarded nor made any content of the text available and said nothing beyond that it encouraged me to report the matter to the moderators (not the actual terms used), so no i reject your claim of revealing a confidentiality. No its none of your business, get it, none of your business.
Originally posted by divegeestersorry i cannot recall any of my children receiving a lesson on murder, computer science and Internet bullying yes. Why do you think a third party would send a private message accusing you of Internet bullying if it were not the case?
Murder is a serious issue to robbie carrobie, children are taught in school that murder is a bad thing. Stating that something is bad and that children are educated about it does not mean that it has happened. You really need to get a tighter grip on reality or at least come up with some evidence to support your claim.
Originally posted by divegeesterwhat transpires in a private message between me and anyone else is none of your business, suffice to say, they brought the matter of Internet bullying on your part ti my attention, which i I were you i would take seriously, for its a serious accusation.
But it is every bit my business robbie as you have brought it into the public domain as claimed evidence that you are not alone in your charges against me. If you are going to bring it into the forum as evidence then we need to see it, otherwise people will think you are making it up or imagining it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo you haven't robbie, what you posted were indeed samples of my posts to Galveston but not one of them contained the slightest piece of evidence of abuse or bullying or even me being a teeny bit cross. You do realise don't you, that you can't just copy/paste any random post of mine, point at it and say "there, you see, bullying"... You do understand the difference between actual evidence of a serious allegation and something you have imagined don't you?
I have posted details already in this thread i will not do so again, what i will do is rephrase the question, do you think your correspondence with Galveston contributed to his enjoyment or lack of enjoyment of his use of this site.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou seem to be missing my quite obvious point; I do not believe someone has sent you any such message. For all I know you could be making it up. You do understand the difference between real evidence and make believe don't you?
sorry i cannot recall any of my children receiving a lesson on murder, computer science and Internet bullying yes. Why do you think a third party would send a private message accusing you of Internet bullying if it were not the case?
Originally posted by divegeesteron the contrary you followed him from thread to thread, making disparaging comments about his inability to post due to his parents health infact uyou accused him of lying about it, you started a thread to highlight his deficiencies under the guise of forum etiquette, so we shall ask you once again, do you think your actions here have contributed to his enjoyment or otherwise of this site, third time asking.
No you haven't robbie, what you posted were indeed samples of my posts to Galveston but not one of them contained the slightest piece of evidence of abuse or bullying or even me being a teeny bit cross. You do realise don't you, that you can't just copy/paste any random post of mine, point at it and say "there, you see, bullying"... You do understand the ...[text shortened]... rence between actual evidence of a serious allegation and something you have imagined don't you?
Originally posted by divegeesterI dont care whether you believe me or not, i have the correspondence. Yes I understand that you have no way of knowing what I have received and therefore its your word against mine.
You seem to be missing my quite obvious point; I do not believe someone has sent you any such message. For all I know you could be making it up. You do understand the difference between real evidence and make believe don't you?