Forum etiquette

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you have anything to add to this thread about forum etiquette?

yes your thread sucks, that's all I have to say.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes your thread sucks, that's all I have to say.

I can't imagine why you would think that...

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes your thread sucks, that's all I have to say.

Lol. Good one. I'd almost vote for it be the "hypocrite thread of the year".

hypocrite:

(1) A person who engages in the same behaviors he condemns others for.

(2) A person who professes certain ideals, but fails to live up to them.

Originally posted by galveston75
Lol. Good one. I'd almost vote for it be the "hypocrite thread of the year".

hypocrite:

(1) A person who engages in the same behaviors he condemns others for.

(2) A person who professes certain ideals, but fails to live up to them.

I wonder what beauroberts thinks of your behaviour. I hope he retuns, this forum could do with a better representation of the JW organisaation, and certainly a more moderate one.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

'The future of RHP?' That made me chuckle. Besides, you don't even play chess here.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I think you take yourself a bit too seriously. 😀
Get off the pedestal and things will look fine.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

If it's still running, you could return to chessbanter.com where you posted as a man with the screen name "Nick Bourbaki" for years.

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
If it's still running, you could return to chessbanter.com where you posted as a man with the screen name "Nick Bourbaki" for years.

So she/he is a chess crossplayer , or is that a cross chessplayer.? 😀

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I have not issued any insults, lies, or racist or sexist slurs. And I have not insulted you either. I've called you out on your hypocrisy.

Here is what you wrote, verbatim ~ I have not distorted at all:

Duchess64: I would like see more people be able to accept non-personal criticism about their beliefs, arguments, and claimed facts without being so insecure that they must respond with their diverting personal attacks or speculations.

Even you, Duchess64, on some level, must surely realize how hypocritical you sound, surely?

You have no place lecturing people on "insults".

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Since you are no longer interested in playing chess on RHP, why don't you do the rest of us a favor and get lost?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

If what you mean by this is that I am an ardent supporter of free speech in a forum like this, then yes it's true. But I have never sought to "condemn any and all moderation in Forums", as I think you well know. I think you're just trying to"land a punch". A footnote that I have always appended to my posts on freedom of speech here has been that, ultimately, this is a privately owned site, and its owners and their moderators can do what they want. Never once have I condemned them for doing what is within their right to do.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Since you are no longer interested in playing chess on RHP, why don't you do the rest of us a favor and get lost?

Id rather read Duchess64's posts than your lamebo efforts gleaned from youtube. Its bad enough that you can hardly think for yourself what chance do you have thinking in behalf of other people?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Forum etiquette:
Limit your post to <200 words
Give précis of any links given
Don't overuse quote box
Stay on topic
Answer questions

Excellent. Concise. Practical.

I would add, Leave Clan Forum type messaging on the Clan Forum.