Go back
Genesis 19

Genesis 19

Spirituality

K
Strawman

Not Kansas

Joined
10 Jul 04
Moves
6405
Clock
19 Apr 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lucifershammer
From a Catholic perspective, the Pope does not determine the Church's stance - God does (through Scripture and Tradition). A Pope cannot create new dogma from thin air (nor repeal old ones).
Through interpretation of Scripture and Tradition?
EDIT I mean to say, the Church's stance is determined by the Pope's interpretation of these things. You may say that God's word is plain, but don't jump the gun ie espouse something before the Pope does.

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
Clock
19 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Since it's so off-topic, I'll desist after one more question so I can get some understanding of your stance: do you also believe that single and/or unmarried people shouldn't be allowed to adopt children?
I've answered this before - no, I do not believe they should be allowed to adopt children.

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
Clock
19 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
Through interpretation of Scripture and Tradition?
EDIT I mean to say, the Church's stance is determined by the Pope's interpretation of these things. You may say that God's word is plain, but don't jump the gun ie espouse something before the Pope does.
That wasn't very clear. Could you elaborate?

K
Strawman

Not Kansas

Joined
10 Jul 04
Moves
6405
Clock
19 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lucifershammer
That wasn't very clear. Could you elaborate?
The Pope et al interpret the "word of God" for the flock.

O
Digital Blasphemy

Omnipresent

Joined
16 Feb 03
Moves
21533
Clock
19 Apr 05
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Actually, getting back to Genesis 19 for a moment, I have always thought it an interesting continuation of the geneology of the faithful servants to God. Let us put this into perspective, with regard to the "sins of the father".

From Cains loins came a great line of sinners. Truely immoral individuals, rebuking God.

On the converse, look at Lot. Debate the morality of his actions if you will, but one can not deny his obediane to God and those he came from. His daughters had to get him piss drunk to have the incest, as it specifically says he was unaware of it happening, and for that matter, does not say that he ever come to know of it at all! So, our man Lot never in his life intentionally did anything to displease God. Rather furthers the concept of inheriting the sins of the father.

As I mentioned above, not one person in Cains lineage came to be a faithful servant of God. If you follow the geneology, you see that untill the lines of Seth and Cain meet, the pattern does not break. The wicked beget the wicked, and the holy beget the holy. When the bloodlines meet, only then do we see the children taking a different path from that of their father.

Here is Lots lineage.

Adam beget Seth
Seth beget Enosh
Enosh beget Cainan
Cainan beget Mahalalel
Mahalalel beget Jared
Jared beget Enoch
Enoch beget Methuselah
Methuselah beget Lamech
Lamech beget Noah
Noah beget Shem
Shem beget Arphaxad
Arphaxad beget Salah
Salah beget Eber
Eber beget Peleg
Peleg beget Reu
Reu beget Serug
Serug beget Nahor
Nahor beget Terah
Terah beget Haran
Haran beget Lot

So there you have it. I would also note that Lot is the nephew of Abraham (or Abram). So it does "run in the family". 😀
Just thought it might be interesting to know that the person in question here is the twentieth in the line of faithful servants to God since the creation of man.

.......who said those parts with the geneology was boring? 😉 😀

c

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
29935
Clock
19 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eagles54
This chapter typifies for me why it's difficult to take much of the Bible seriously.

Two girls (among many interesting themes) get Dad trashed on successive evenings and bed him?

I'm not sure what teaching incest points toward.
This is not a lesson in incest eagy. It is a recounting of what certain people did. People do do weird things, back then, just as they do today.

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
Clock
19 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KneverKnight
The Pope et al interpret the "word of God" for the flock.
In a sense, yes. But they do so in a framework established by Tradition. Some matters have no leeway whatsoever (infallible dogmatic proclamations, for instance), while others might have quite a bit of leeway (liturgies, organisation of religious orders etc.)

sjj

redbridge/southamptn

Joined
02 Jul 04
Moves
1632
Clock
27 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

how can 1 sum up in just 4 sentences a very wide subject sum not al inter related just take a lok at the diferant subjects 4 gods sake
however the 1st part is al about how we must not get involved in homoism & y we must kep away from unatural desires. however gods comandments r not consistent in 8/10 he breaks them or lets others break them so who realy nose wat the hel he wants at any given time it wod apear
07859344451/02380909557/sj-ewj5@hotmail.co.uk

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.