Originally posted by sonshipThe kingdom of the heavens in the book of Matthew is firstly inward in the disciples - jaywillDo these qualities describe something in a person's heart or a real government?
The question as it is framed really sets up a false dichotomy.
IE. "real government" verses "something in a person's heart."
The kingdom of the heavens in the book of [b]Matthew is firstly inward in the disciples. It is even hidden yet real. Even ...[text shortened]... of the kingdom of God - its critical inward reality and the reward of its outward manifestation.[/b]
Nonsense and unsupported by the original language or the context.
(please dont post a wall of text attempting to substantiate your claim.)
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWould you like a Youtube video instead?
The kingdom of the heavens in the book of Matthew is firstly inward in the disciples - jaywill
Nonsense and unsupported by the original language or the context.
(please dont post a wall of text attempting to substantiate your claim.)
Here is a short one:
The Kingdom of Heaven
Originally posted by RJHindsI never watch any of your YouTube videos Jonah. If you can explain in simple terms how the verse at Matthew supports the position (that the Kingdom of God is within) both linguistically and contextually then please do so.
Would you like a Youtube video instead?
Here is a short one:
The Kingdom of Heaven
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3xzBZNM3L0
13 May 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHow man times does sonhouse have to point out that RJHinds can not think for himself, but needs BS youtube videos to do it for him?
I never watch any of your YouTube videos Jonah. If you can explain in simple terms how the verse at Matthew supports the position (that the Kingdom of God is within) both linguistically and contextually then please do so.
Originally posted by Rajk999My question does relate to your uncalled for accusation against JW's.
Your question has no relevance to the topic.
If you can, address the issue in the topic you started.
It would be good to know your viewpoint in making that accusation.
It would also be good if you could contribute any constructive thoughts to the subject of God's Kingdom being real or not.
13 May 15
Originally posted by divegeesterSo your spewing ad hominum attacks is considered good etiquette?
No, there is no "direction". There is only forum etiquette and intellectual honesty, both of which you are sadly lacking. The words you posted in YOUR opening post, which is not a reply/quote of another post in the same thread, are SOME ELSE'S words which you are trying to pass off as your own. Your JW buddy Galveston75 was repeatedly called out over the same issue.
Do you have any thoughts about God's Kingdom being real?