29 Jan 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsI've never done that, though. If anything I am infamous here at RHP for confronting him with exactly what he has said. There is absolutely no reason to misquote or misrepresent what Dasa says. Verbatim quoting of his bizarre or injudicious remarks is one thing that makes Dasa get really angry and accuse people of "misquoting" him. You wouldn't be able to find one example of me misrepresenting what he said in the last 2 years even if you wanted to. So you've drawn a blank with that one.
Misquoting and misrepresenting what Dasa said. Those were on Dasa's
list of Dishonesty.
What other "lies" do you accuse me of, RJHinds?
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by RJHindsI have never lied about the fact that my belief system is different from yours. Not once. So you've drawn a blank with that one too.
You are in violation of the ten laws of God given to man to obey, yet you
are more concerned with the websites' TOS, calling violation of the TOS a
"Big Deal". You even deny your sins as if you are innocent. Apparently
violation of the Ten Commandments is not such a "Big Deal" to you.
I welcome the fact that you're now trying to be specific with your accusations. But you've not come up with one yet.
What other "lies" do you claim I have told?
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by FMFYou still insist Dasa called for "genocide" on all Muslims, huh?
I've never done that, though. If anything I am infamous here at RHP for confronting him with exactly what he has said. There is absolutely no reason to misquote or misrepresent what Dasa says. Verbatim quoting of his bizarre or injudicious remarks is one thing that makes Dasa get really angry and accuse people of "misquoting" him. You wouldn't be able to find on ...[text shortened]... So you've drawn a blank with that one.
What other "lies" do you accuse me of, RJHinds?
Did he actually use the word "genocide" when he said what he said?
Originally posted by RJHindsDasa called for genocide, yes. All Muslim men. No exceptions. Some women would be spared. Children would escape with their lives. He even used the word "genocide" on page 2 of the thread, so he knew exactly what his proposal meant. At least 60 fellow posters have seen the thread. Many have come forward to corroborate what I have said. I have even quoted him verbatim. No "lie" on my part. So you've drawn yet another blank. What other "lies" do you accuse me of, RJHinds?
You still insist Dasa called for "genocide" on all Muslims, huh?
Did he actually use the word "genocide" when he said what he said?
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by josephwCheating is deliberately breaking the rules of a game in the attempt to gain an advantage. You have acknowledged that the use of an engine is against the TOS, which you have accepted as part of signing up to this site. So is it not open to debate that the deliberate use of a chess engine for games on this site is cheating. If the site did not outlaw it (which some don't apparently) it would not.
According to the TOS. And you apparently.
But I just don't care if someone uses an "engine" to play against me. You see, it has the stigma of being more challenging.
If you meant that you don't agree with it being a TOS, then you should clarify what you meant. But until it's removed from the TOS, the deliberate use of a chess engine is unquestionably cheating.
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by FMFIn one of your posts you wrote the following about Dasa:
Dasa called for genocide, yes. All Muslim men. No exceptions. Some women would be spared. Children would escape with their lives. He even used the word "genocide" on page 2 of the thread, so he knew exactly what his proposal meant. At least 60 fellow posters have seen the thread. Many have come forward to corroborate what I have said. I have even quoted him verb ...[text shortened]... part. So you've drawn yet another blank. What other "lies" do you accuse me of, RJHinds?
"He said that all Muslim men were to be "eradicated" (his word), even if they
converted to other religions [his actual words were "force must be used and
termination of all Muslims would be the rule. Muslims converting to other
religions at the eleventh hour would not be accepted"], the women "would be
allowed to prove themselves" to him and perhaps spared (his words exactly)..."
I replied with the following:
"This proves that your understanding of what Dasa meant is flawed.
By Dasa's own words it had nothing to do with what religion they were.
So if they are no longer believers in Islam, they would no longer be
Muslim. So what was the reason he believed all of these persons
should be eliminated? He answered that question later when He
called them criminals. What did they do to be termed criminals?
Did you ask Dasa that question?"
You responded with the following:
"Dasa proposed the termination of all Muslim men because they were Muslims,
and perhaps the sparing of some Muslim women, even though they were Muslim."
You never answered my questions and when you used his exact words as you
wrote, the word "genocide" was not there. But now you write he used that
that word when he called for his action. Since you did not answer my
questions, I was not convinced and later replied with the following:
"I still think Dasa meant all the extremist Muslims that are the terrorist
who believe in the Islam that supports Jehad against all infidels, which
they interpret to mean anyone that is not a Muslim. He may not even
know there are other Muslims who do not think this way."
I then believe I copied some information on the definition of "genocide"
to we would be clear of what the term meant. Dasa then replied to me with
the following:
"Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.
When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious."
But after this you still insist Dasa meant what you think he meant and you
did not misunderstand him in any way. So all I have left to say is read
Dasa's post on Dishonesty and see if you see yourself in some of those
things that makes a person dishonest. If not, then I can not help you.
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by RJHindsRJHinds, Dasa called for genocide in his deleted 19th December thread. Dozens of people have seen the thread. I've lost count of those who have posted to confirm the fact that Dasa called for genocide, specifically, explicitly, and his actual words have been re-posted verbatim several times. The fact that Dasa has tried to distance himself from what he proposed since he returned from his two week ban does not alter what he proposed. If anything, several of his attempts to disown the clear meaning of the words he wrote, have made it all the more obvious that his 19th December thread was a call for genocide.
In one of your posts you wrote the following about Dasa:
"He said that all Muslim men were to be "eradicated" (his word), even if they
converted to other religions [his actual words were "force must be used and
termination of all Muslims would be the rule. Muslims converting to other
religions at the eleventh hour would not be accepted"], the women "w ...[text shortened]... e
things that makes a person dishonest. If not, then I can not help you.
So you've drawn another blank with this stuff about Dasa.
Are there any other "lies" that you accuse me of - one that you can substantiate, perhaps?
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by FMFI must agree with Dasa on this one, too. I say with Dasa the following:
RJHinds, Dasa called for genocide in his deleted 19th December thread. Dozens of people have seen the thread. I've lost count of those who have posted to confirm the fact that Dasa called for genocide, specifically, explicitly, and his actual words have been re-posted verbatim several times. The fact that Dasa has tried to distance himself from what he proposed ...[text shortened]...
Are there any other "lies" that you accuse me of - one that you can substantiate, perhaps?
"I cannot discuss with you while you are constantly dishonest and fabricate assertions and untruths." 😏
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by RJHindsYou've drawn a complete blank on all your accusations of "lying". One after another. Nothing.
I must agree with Dasa on this one, too. I say with Dasa the following:
"I cannot discuss with you while you are constantly dishonest and fabricate assertions and untruths." 😏
29 Jan 12
1 edit
-Removed-I am not a National Master level chess player OTB. To be a master one
has to maintain a 2200+ rating for at least 300 games. I have not even
played that many OTB rated games. And even though my rating is 1817
USCF, now it will likely drop because the highest rated USCF player I
have beaten was only rated 1598 at the time. He was in the under 1600
section of the 1982 World Open in which I won that $4,500. I entered
that tournament with a USCF published rating of 1572 and in the January
1983 issue, my rating was listed as 1817. That seems to be a big jump
but perhaps they used my opponents increased ratings when they did
the new calculation to get my new rating. I don't know how many OTB
rated games I have played because I did not keep my scorecards for
the rated games I played at the chess club in virginia. But it has to be
easily less than 50 total. But you will begin to see how I play the OTB
tournament games as soon as I start new games because I will no longer
use the analyze board, opening books, or other aids while playing any
new games.
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by RJHindsYou keep babbling on about all this garbage, but it's all irrelevant. The numbers are clear - you've been shown to have been using an engine. Stop using it, and stop lying about it. Nobody cares about the rest.
I am not a National Master level chess player OTB. To be a master one
has to maintain a 2200+ rating for at least 300 games. I have not even
played that many OTB rated games. And even though my rating is 1817
USCF, now it will likely drop because the highest rated USCF player I
have beaten was only rated 1598 at the time. He was in the under 1600
se ...[text shortened]... ll no longer
use the analyze board, opening books, or other aids while playing any
new games.
29 Jan 12
Originally posted by RJHinds2200+ for 300 games earns a Life Master title and 2200 rating floor. Brian Wall and "Kirby" Burnette are two examples.
I am not a National Master level chess player OTB. To be a master one
has to maintain a 2200+ rating for at least 300 games. I have not even
played that many OTB rated games. And even though my rating is 1817
USCF, now it will likely drop because the highest rated USCF player I
have beaten was only rated 1598 at the time. He was in the under 1600
se ...[text shortened]... ll no longer
use the analyze board, opening books, or other aids while playing any
new games.