- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121514
16 Dec 23
@divegeester saidTHIS ☝🏼
When a member of your club screen-grabbed all the pages of your lies and sent them to FMF, were you embarrassed?
Is that why you kicked all the suspects out of your club?
Is this behaviour by you the reason you had to step down from being a moderator elsewhere prior to joining RHP?
Is this behaviour why you dread meeting with your colleagues at work?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29814
16 Dec 23
@divegeester saidSharing personal correspondence on a public forum would be unpleasant for anybody. it would also be a breach of the site's terms and conditions.
Ghost of a Duke?
Do you think it is ok to share personal emails or contents from a private club in a public forum?
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBut if your vindictiveness in your private club was rooted in you getting people muddled up, then... oh dear. I mean, really. Oh dear.
It's easily done.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121514
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBut it wasn’t “personal correspondence” was it.
Sharing personal correspondence on a public forum would be unpleasant for anybody. it would also be a breach of the site's terms and conditions.
Do you think it is ok to share personal emails or contents from a private club in a public forum?
You marked it “official” and sent it from your official work email address. The NHS!
Tut tut. A dismissible act, in some places.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29814
16 Dec 23
@fmf saidBut your story has change a number of times. At first it was done to give the impression there were more writers on the show (strange then to use an identifiable spoonerism and not am anonymous pseudonym) and then it was just done in fun (strange to do so at at time there was absolutely no fun between us).
I have always been completely honest about why I put two of your stories in the show and why I used a tongue in cheek pseudonym.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe email was sent to an address that is accessed by dozens of people, including me, and it was full of untrue accusations. If people here saw it, would you be vindicated or would you feel stabbed in the back?
Do you think it is ok to share personal emails or contents from a private club in a public forum?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121514
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDo you now feel embarrassed at your histrionic threats to pursue FMF and myself with the data protection act over this?
But your story has change a number of times. At first it was done to give the impression there were more writers on the show (strange then to use an identifiable spoonerism and not am anonymous pseudonym) and then it was just done in fun (strange to do so at at time there was absolutely no fun between us).
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121514
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWell you were wrong laddie.
But there was no muddling up. I made the valid assumption you had acted together,...as you are doing now. As you always do.
And now you’re in the bug jar.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29814
16 Dec 23
@divegeester saidI have explained this before. I'm not going to again. But I will (one last time) point out that Egress sets the security settings of my emails (official - official sensitive etc) not me. And I don't work for the NHS.
But it wasn’t “personal correspondence” was it.
You marked it “official” and sent it from your official work email address. The NHS!
Tut tut. A dismissible act, in some places.
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYes it was done light-heartedly. The "story" has never changed. Obviously Bill and I and Phil could have written the whole show if we'd wanted to. We had just two each, though, using some silly names, and I put two of yours in too. It's just a fun show.
But your story has change a number of times. At first it was done to give the impression there were more writers on the show (strange then to use an identifiable spoonerism and not am anonymous pseudonym) and then it was just done in fun (strange to do so at at time there was absolutely no fun between us).
16 Dec 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBut your accusations were invalid.
But there was no muddling up. I made the valid assumption you had acted together,...as you are doing now. As you always do.
16 Dec 23
@divegeester saidThe local government he works for, not the NHS.
You marked it “official” and sent it from your official work email address. The NHS!