@pb1022 saidThe centre of your life, your saviour, your Lord...
No, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus.
If He’s not at the center of a Christian’s life, He should be. He is not only their Saviour, but their Lord as well.
Your everlasting life, your salvation, indwelling "Holy Spirit" in you, your supernatural transformation...
You, you, you, you.
@fmf saidIf no hope in salvation and eternal life is part and parcel of how your life is structured, and if the absence of belief in the eternal plays a part in giving your life meaning, then may you find the security, peace and happiness you're pursuing in this lifetime in this world.
If such hopes play some part in giving your life meaning and structure, so be it.
16 Jan 22
@josephw saidWhile I think religion still has a purpose to serve in terms of society [as mentioned on page 1], for me personally, Christian beliefs have already served their purpose.
If no hope in salvation and eternal life is part and parcel of how your life is structured, and if the absence of belief in the eternal plays a part in giving your life meaning, then may you find the security, peace and happiness you're pursuing in this lifetime in this world.
@josephw saidMy Christian past forms a significant part of my "nurture". And it's "nurture" and "nature" that combine to form one's moral compass. So, for me personally, Christian beliefs have already served their purpose.
So for you personally "Christian beliefs" are no longer viable. They "serve" no "purpose".
31 Jan 22
@fmf saidGhost of a Duke [on another thread]: "I think the whole religion thing is limited in scope and that it is time for humanity to collectively put away childhood things and look to the future of science and exploration. There is still a huge amount we do not know, but that cognitive knowledge isn't going to be found looking backwards."
While I agree with the sentiment that "...morality is [or should be] about reducing suffering in the world.... and spirituality is [or should be] about questioning and looking for answers"... I am inclined to think that religion continues to have a cohesive and meaning-creating purpose for most people in most cultures and societies.
The question is this:
Religious values are transmitted via "nurture" ~ i.e. what people experience that contributes hugely to the formation of their moral compasses.
Those values are absorbed as we grow and help us to govern our behaviour and they act in favour of social cohesion, how is this process replaced exactly if the values-baby is possibly thrown out with the religionist bathwater?