Go back
Hear why DNA Refutes Evolution

Hear why DNA Refutes Evolution

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Nobel prize???, LOL, Barack H. Obama won a Nobel prize for peace, just after starting a
war with Afghanistan, it is to laugh!
Nobel prize =/= Nobel peace prize Robbie.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Peace_Prize
The Nobel Peace Prize [...] is one of the five Nobel Prizes bequeathed by the Swedish industrialist and inventor Alfred Nobel, along with the prizes in Chemistry, Physics, Physiology or Medicine, and Literature. It is awarded to those who have "done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."[1]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize
The Nobel Prize [...] is a set of annual international awards bestowed in a number of categories by Scandinavian committees in recognition of cultural and scientific advances. The will of the Swedish chemist Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, established the prizes in 1895. The prizes in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, and Peace were first awarded in 1901.[1]

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
i was paraphrasing but thats basically what he says between 3:20 and 3:50.

something like "nature cannot create information, cannot communicate, it has no sender or receiver, information is knowledge passed between a sender and a receiver"

Vote Up
Vote Down

While the guy looks like a goof ball I do think the part about were intent or will of design is intriguing. He uses the words special creation. Like we can all look at a watch and know that it was specially designed or created with intent to tell time LOL



Manny

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stellspalfie
he doesnt actually explain anything, thats why its so funny. it is literally nonsense. if he actually made a point then we could agree or disagree. did you think he made any valid points?

an example would be "nature cannot pass on information" is there anybody else on the planet that would agree with this statement?
No he didn't go into any great detail but did he have too? Could not anyone with a working and reasoning mind and with basic knowledge of life in general see what he is saying makes sense?
But anyway here is your opportunity or anyone elses chance to explain how this DNA stuff could JUST happen. We'll be waiting.

Vote Up
Vote Down

2 edits

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
No he didn't go into any great detail but did he have too? Could not anyone with a working and reasoning mind and with basic knowledge of life in general see what he is saying makes sense?
But anyway here is your opportunity or anyone elses chance to explain how this DNA stuff could JUST happen. We'll be waiting.
why do you want me to explain this? how does my opinion validate or invalidate what the crazy guy is saying. is the logic that if i dont know the answer then i dont know when somebody else is getting it wrong? so if somebody sticks up a video of a man saying a black hole is made of cheese and i couldn't explain exactly what a black hole is then i shouldnt say the cheese guy is talking rubbish?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Why do you call a 'fact' something you clearly don't understand - and worse didn't even bother to think about. I mean a mutation is by definition the creation of new information. Or do you have some cleverly crafted definition for "information" that allows you to talk nonsense whilst supposedly not lying?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
he also said the other things i put in my reply. regardless, information is everywhere and it is processed in many different ways. we know some animals and plants pass information vocally, with colour, movement, smells, liquids and so on, they also pass on information through genetic memory, dna and dna mutations (if he disagrees with this lets see him volunteer to have his balls zapped with radiation).

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
you dont have cancer. you then suffer a genetic mutation because you moved to chernobyl and you develop cancer. the cancer is a mutation of your dna making it create new strands that it didnt previous to exposure to radiation. voila new information.


The Information Challenge

By Richard Dawkins

http://www.skeptics.com.au/publications/articles/the-information-challenge/

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.