24 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfHow can you be 100% sure and still unable to prove it? Either you don't understand what 100% sure means or you are lying about it.
No.
Have you looked at https://www.redhotpawn.com/board/search.php?authorname=Romans1009 and the conversation (scattered across 3 threads) that led up to him making the claim?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou asked me to prove it. And I said no (I won't). Yes, I understand what 100% sure means. I am 100% sure that Romans1009's claim about his education and degree is both untrue and just a stool of inane and humorless attention-seeking banter.
How can you be 100% sure and still unable to prove it? Either you don't understand what 100% sure means or you are lying about it.
Same goes for him pretending that he doesn't believe Ghost of a Duke's revelations about his degree and work. It's blatantly bogus and a nasty obnoxious kind of banter too. I am 100% sure.
And me saying this now means, for his own sake, and for the sake of your hapless disingenuous adolescent pride, he will never be able to admit that it was just infantile banter, and will instead have to wear this bit of makes-him-look-dumb jerk behaviour on his sleeve hereon in.
Originally posted by @fmfHold on, let's get this straight: When Romans says that Ghost's degree and work are bogus it is 'blatantly bogus and a nasty obnoxious kind of banter'? But when you say the same thing about Romans it's perfectly fine?
You asked me to prove it. And I said no (I won't). Yes, I understand what 100% sure means. I am 100% sure that Romans1009's claim about his education and degree is both untrue and just a stool of inane and humorless attention-seeking banter.
Same goes for him pretending that he doesn't believe Ghost of a Duke's revelations about his degree and work. It's bl ...[text shortened]... ill instead have to wear this bit of makes-him-look-dumb jerk behaviour on his sleeve hereon in.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerGoaD is pretty much unilaterally liked and respected, whereas Romans1009, and you for that matter, are pretty much unilaterally discredited, debunked and derided.
Hold on, let's get this straight: When Romans says that Ghost's degree and work are bogus it is 'blatantly bogus and a nasty obnoxious kind of banter'? But when you say the same thing about Romans it's perfectly fine?
Not sure if that makes a difference though...
24 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterGoad is liked by snorkel boy and the atheist club. Who would have imagined that?
GoaD is pretty much unilaterally liked and respected, whereas Romans1009, and you for that matter, are pretty much unilaterally discredited, debunked and derided.
Not sure if that makes a difference though...
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWas that yelp you just let out?
Goad is liked by snorkel boy and the atheist club. Who would have imagined that?
24 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfConsidering I copy-and-pasted exactly what you said about yourself, it’s obvious I was joking. To claim what I posted was a “lie,” just shows how desperate you are to slander me.
You asked me to prove it. And I said no (I won't). Yes, I understand what 100% sure means. I am 100% sure that Romans1009's claim about his education and degree is both untrue and just a stool of inane and humorless attention-seeking banter.
Same goes for him pretending that he doesn't believe Ghost of a Duke's revelations about his degree and work. It's bl ...[text shortened]... ill instead have to wear this bit of makes-him-look-dumb jerk behaviour on his sleeve hereon in.
And it wasn’t a lie anyway because it’s obvious I was not trying to deceive anyone. If my intention were to deceive, I would not have copy-and-pasted exactly what you said about yourself.
24 Apr 18
But you’re wrong about my assertion regarding Ghost.
I don’t think for a second he has a degree in theology based on his lack of knowledge about the Bible and the elementary errors he makes on the rare occasions when he has discussed it over the last three months (since I’ve been here; can’t speak to before then.)
And I don’t for a second believe he manages a team of mental health professionals based on how much time he spends in here, and his behavior in here is out of whack with someone in charge of managing anyone or anything.
Originally posted by @romans1009You are blinded by pettiness and so wrapped up in your own lies that you are incapable of recognizing honesty in others.
But you’re wrong about my assertion regarding Ghost.
I don’t think for a second he has a degree in theology based on his lack of knowledge about the Bible and the elementary errors he makes on the rare occasions when he has discussed it over the last three months (since I’ve been here; can’t speak to before then.)
And I don’t for a second believe h ...[text shortened]... and his behavior in here is out of whack with someone in charge of managing anyone or anything.
And the 'notion' that you have a better understanding of the bible is truly laughable.
24 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeWhere’s that team of mental health professionals you manage? Have they been on vacation for three months?
You are blinded by pettiness and so wrapped up in your own lies that you are incapable of recognizing honesty in others.
And the 'notion' that you have a better understanding of the bible is truly laughable.
Talk some more about the “talking snake” in Genesis. Your understanding of that was quite profound 🙄
Originally posted by @romans1009Considering I copy-and-pasted exactly what you said about yourself, it’s obvious I was joking. To claim what I posted was a “lie,” just shows how desperate you are to slander me. And it wasn’t a lie anyway because it’s obvious I was not trying to deceive anyone. If my intention were to deceive, I would not have copy-and-pasted exactly what you said about yourself.
Considering I copy-and-pasted exactly what you said about yourself, it’s obvious I was joking. To claim what I posted was a “lie,” just shows how desperate you are to slander me.
And it wasn’t a lie anyway because it’s obvious I was not trying to deceive anyone. If my intention were to deceive, I would not have copy-and-pasted exactly what you said about yourself.
Exactly. Infantile, untrue, unfunny, obnoxious "banter". dj2becker, see what I mean?
Originally posted by @romans1009I don’t think for a second he has a degree in theology.... [blah blah blah]
But you’re wrong about my assertion regarding Ghost.
I don’t think for a second he has a degree in theology based on his lack of knowledge about the Bible and the elementary errors he makes on the rare occasions when he has discussed it over the last three months (since I’ve been here; can’t speak to before then.)
And I don’t for a second believe h ...[text shortened]... and his behavior in here is out of whack with someone in charge of managing anyone or anything.
And I don’t for a second believe he manages a team of mental health professionals... [blah blah blah]
More of the same infantile, untrue, unfunny, obnoxious "banter".
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009It sounds like someone broke your heart.
Where’s that team of mental health professionals you manage? Have they been on vacation for three months?
Talk some more about the “talking snake” in Genesis. Your understanding of that was quite profound 🙄
Originally posted by @romans1009You realise that 'talking snake' are sonship's words, right?
Talk some more about the “talking snake” in Genesis. Your understanding of that was quite profound
(From 'his' thread 'Why I believe in talking snake' )
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterThat those that have a heart for rational debate and the coherent exchange of ideas and beliefs can engage in thoughtful discussions without the hindrance of underhanded and spiteful name calling and insults designed to derail logical debate by trolls.
What are your hopes for this forum for the remainder of this year?