Originally posted by sonhouseDid you see this one?
Have you forgotten your Alzheimer meds again? You put that one up a few months ago. You really think Darwin thought Apes could become men? We know that doesn't happen so your so-called video is bogus from the opening screen. You are pathetic and desperate.
Biologist Exposes Lie of "Overwhelming Evidence for Evolution"
Or this one?
BIOCHEMIST ADMITS EVOLUTION IS A LIE
Or maybe this one?
Another Evolutionary Biologist Rejects The Bogus Theory of Evolution
Originally posted by C HessSpoken like a true believer.
It doesn't change completely with time. It gets more and more solid with time. There are aspects about evolutionary theory that haven't changed since Darwin's days, and then there are a lot of questions that have been answered over the last 150 odd years. It keeps getting more and more support in evidence, so I honestly don't understand where you're coming fr ...[text shortened]... as an hypotheses. It's pretty solid by now, like it or not.
And that's the reality of things.
Originally posted by RJHindsYes, we've all seen your creationist propaganda videos. If you want to see them debunked, and youtube videos are all you can digest, you can rest assure that there are tons of youtubers who's done just that. But you wouldn't venture into reality, would you?
Did you see this one?
Biologist Exposes Lie of "Overwhelming Evidence for Evolution"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LTaPIK7maY
Or this one?
BIOCHEMIST ADMITS EVOLUTION IS A LIE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdi3TGd717U
Or maybe this one?
Another Evolutionary Biologist Rejects The Bogus Theory of Evolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2RZzyFTTXo
Originally posted by KellyJayNo, you speak like a true believer. Never once do you point to a specific example that evolution can't answer, but you constantly parade your infinite wisdom about how science can't seem to make up its mind. And as if that wasn't enough, you then eagerly preach creationism, that lack evidence, can't be falsified and basically comes from what I can only assume is a mistake in your understanding of the bible, since so many firm believers in christ do accept evolution and reject young earth creationism.
Spoken like a true believer.
20 Oct 14
Originally posted by C HessWhen the evolutionists decide to do some real honest science in an attempt to prove and disprove what they believe, then maybe we will all find what the truth really is.
Yes, we've all seen your creationist propaganda videos. If you want to see them debunked, and youtube videos are all you can digest, you can rest assure that there are tons of youtubers who's done just that. But you wouldn't venture into reality, would you?
There are no youtube videos that prove the theory of evolution at this time.
Originally posted by RJHindsYour mind is so far beyond repair I can only feel sorry for you at this point. In the words of the great Mr. T: "I pity the fool."
When the evolutionists decide to do some real honest science in an attempt to prove and disprove what they believe, then maybe we will all find what the truth really is.
There are no youtube videos that prove the theory of evolution at this time.
Originally posted by C HessFriend you stopped looking for flaws as far as I'm concern, you've made up
No, you speak like a true believer. Never once do you point to a specific example that evolution can't answer, but you constantly parade your infinite wisdom about how science can't seem to make up its mind. And as if that wasn't enough, you then eagerly preach creationism, that lack evidence, can't be falsified and basically comes from what I can only assume ...[text shortened]... , since so many firm believers in christ do accept evolution and reject young earth creationism.
your mind. You don't see holes when people point them out to you, and you
go on as if you are talking about facts! I understand what I believe cannot
be proven, you accept what you believe has been. You don't see the
difference I don't think you ever will.
Originally posted by C HessI have pointed out to you issues that evolution cannot answer unless the
No, you speak like a true believer. Never once do you point to a specific example that evolution can't answer, but you constantly parade your infinite wisdom about how science can't seem to make up its mind. And as if that wasn't enough, you then eagerly preach creationism, that lack evidence, can't be falsified and basically comes from what I can only assume ...[text shortened]... , since so many firm believers in christ do accept evolution and reject young earth creationism.
most magical events all take place to see it through, which you buy into.
I get you are a man of faith, you believe the events that had to have
occurred, why they must have to make evolution viable since we are all
here. You ignore serious questions about how all this came into being, and
you ignore all the issues keeping anything alive that long and reproducing
getting all the necessary good mutations never enough bad to kill off all life.
Originally posted by KellyJayWhy do I get the feeling you don't really believe in creationism because the evidence is too strong against it, but instead you are just playing devils advocate for that cause?
I have pointed out to you issues that evolution cannot answer unless the
most magical events all take place to see it through, which you buy into.
I get you are a man of faith, you believe the events that had to have
occurred, why they must have to make evolution viable since we are all
here. You ignore serious questions about how all this came into bei ...[text shortened]... and reproducing
getting all the necessary good mutations never enough bad to kill off all life.
Originally posted by KellyJayI hardly ignore your points. I've explained, I don't know how many times why they're not good objections to evolution. How life started has nothing to do with evolution and beneficial mutations have been observed to occur, and I think I've made it quite clear how that is really all you need to consider the theory more than plausible. That coupled with the fossil record, molecular biology and many other fields of science that arose thanks to this theory having predictability properties, makes it a closed case. It's fine if you don't mind taking these things on faith, but you're talking absolute horse manure when you suggest I do.
I have pointed out to you issues that evolution cannot answer unless the
most magical events all take place to see it through, which you buy into.
I get you are a man of faith, you believe the events that had to have
occurred, why they must have to make evolution viable since we are all
here. You ignore serious questions about how all this came into bei ...[text shortened]... and reproducing
getting all the necessary good mutations never enough bad to kill off all life.
I doubt you'll actually read this, but I'll throw it at you anyway:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_teacherfaq.php
I think I'm pretty much done with this discussion. From this point on I won't even try to explain, but just point out when you guys talk silly, mostly to humor myself.
Originally posted by sonhouseI do believe in it, and I don't see the evidence as strong as you seem to
Why do I get the feeling you don't really believe in creationism because the evidence is too strong against it, but instead you are just playing devils advocate for that cause?
see it. For me getting the functional design we see in life from haphazard
mutations through natural selection isn't even a possiblity in my opinion
to the degree it is in play.
Originally posted by C HessAs you wish.
I hardly ignore your points. I've explained, I don't know how many times why they're not good objections to evolution. How life started has nothing to do with evolution and beneficial mutations have been observed to occur, and I think I've made it quite clear how that is really all you need to consider the theory more than plausible. That coupled with the fos ...[text shortened]... won't even try to explain, but just point out when you guys talk silly, mostly to humor myself.
Kelly