- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsLook. I can also repost links:
Mount St. Helens: Explosive Evidence for Young Earth Creation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0f4URsDWy0
http://www.chem.tufts.edu/science/franksteiger/grandcyn.htm
Weirdly, creationists consider the Mount St. Helens/Grand Canyon argument one of their best examples of refuting "evolutionism."
Weirdly indeed.
21 Oct 14
2 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseWe have revealed that there is no data for an old earth. There is only assumption and speculation of an old earth in order to make evolution seem credible. For example:
We do what we have to do! No problem! Good luck with your research projects.
The Sun is changing the rate of radioactive decay
Constant decay of radioactive elements assumption busted.
http://cuthelain.wordpress.com/2013/05/27/the-sun-is-changing-the-rate-of-radioactive-decay/
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsWhen someone gets a Nobel prize for this discovery, I'll believe you. Until then, its almost certainly hogwash. Such a discovery would definitely deserve a Nobel prize, so either the discoverer has so far failed to convince anyone in the scientific field of his findings, or he has no interest in money. Perhaps you would care to speculate why he doesn't yet have a Nobel prize?
Constant decay of radioactive elements assumption busted.
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadIt is not a popular idea.
When someone gets a Nobel prize for this discovery, I'll believe you. Until then, its almost certainly hogwash. Such a discovery would definitely deserve a Nobel prize, so either the discoverer has so far failed to convince anyone in the scientific field of his findings, or he has no interest in money. Perhaps you would care to speculate why he doesn't yet have a Nobel prize?
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsSo did you read the part that said 'ever so slightly faster in summer than winter"? This is not the grand refutation of C14 dating you were wishing for. It is a tiny effect only noticed in a deep statistical analysis. Sorry, you lose one more round.
We have revealed that there is no data for an old earth. There is only assumption and speculation of an old earth in order to make evolution seem credible. For example:
[b]The Sun is changing the rate of radioactive decay
Constant decay of radioactive elements assumption busted.
http://cuthelain.wordpress.com/2013/05/27/the-sun-is-changing-the-rate-of-radioactive-decay/[/b]