05 Jun 15
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesteryou cannot separate the issue from the actions which led to the hypocrisy especially when you yourself have engaged in much more sinister personal remarks. our willingness to distance yourself from the actions which led to the hypocrisy only accentuates your hypocritical stance even further.
There are no double standards from PK either. He is calling on your hypocrisy about personal remarks, not the use of them.
It's quite simple robbie, and pretending to be thick while metaphorically standing in the middle of forum with your pants at your ankles is not helping you.
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs a matter of interest, do you have some kind of a personal, private, unconventional definition of "hypocrisy" that no one else here is using?
you cannot separate the issue from the actions which led to the hypocrisy especially when you yourself have engaged in much more sinister personal remarks.
05 Jun 15
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterso lets get this, To use an analogy, if in a court of law you would concern yourself not with the actions of the individual, merely with the outcome of those actions? Is that really what you are saying? some one is knocked down by a car, you are unconcerned with how they were knocked down, simply that they were knocked down, is that what you are saying?
Yes we can, and have been doing so with incisive effect for 10 pages now.
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by divegeesterplease just stop your ignorance is tedious.
After all these years in your cult and you are still a "nobody"; seems harsh. Perhaps if you took some lessons in door-to-door work you would get more converts and increase your chances of promotion.
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by FMFjust out of interest what is the intent of that post? it appears to me to be a kind of loaded question, plastic and transparent but loaded never the less kind of like putting your knight on e6 and making a threat and hoping that your opponent doesn't see it, do you like to play hope chess?
As a matter of interest, do you have some kind of a personal, private, unconventional definition of "hypocrisy" that no one else here is using?
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is not as court of law.
so lets get this, To use an analogy, if in a court of law you would concern yourself not with the actions of the individual, merely with the outcome of those actions? Is that really what you are saying?
You have been caught out in your hypocritical stance about the use of personal remarks in a public forum.
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDon't answer it then. You claiming that you have a personal, private, unconventional definition of "hypocrisy" is just about the only way I can imagine you pretending that the things you've said on the last 10 pages or so have made any sense or have been said with any integrity.
just out of interest what is the intent of that post? it appears to me to be a kind of loaded question, plastic and transparent but loaded never the less kind of like putting your knight on e6 and making a threat and hoping that your opponent doesn't see it, do you like to play hope chess?
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm just wondering why you think your leadership would not be interested in seeing a transcript of this thread.
please just stop your ignorance is tedious.
Surely no one is a "nobody" in the JW's? You claim to be a "minister of god". Aren't you all princes or something like that? Besides these people are the ones you will be inheriting the earth with, surely they have a right to know what weasel you are?
05 Jun 15
Originally posted by divegeesterNo one has said it is a court of law and knowing that you would predictably raise the objection and try to deflect that is why i stated it was an analogy making your objection irrelevant, now why don't you answer the question or shall this be another instance of your hypocritically evading answering a question while drawing attention to others alleged hypocrisy for doing the same?
This is not as court of law.
You have been caught out in your hypocritical stance about the use of personal remarks in a public forum.