27 Jan 14
Originally posted by CalJustI told you I believe in both Creation and evolution, and this is a factual
(Originally posted by KellyJay)
I'm a young earth creationist, and I believe in evolution. Anything can be
used to be anti-God even the Bible. People use almost anything to suit their
own ends.
Kelly
This wasn't intended to be another (yawn!) thread about evolution per se, but merely to point out that it is factually incorrect to state that Ev ...[text shortened]... , no matter how uncomfortable and abhorrent the concept may be to them, and if not, why not.[/b]
statement.
I'm not giving it credit for all the changes many want to give evolution
credit for. That is not disbelieving in evolution that is not agreeing with the
amount of change is possible within life forms. I accept that when you see
changes in a life form kinds like a dog, you start with dog kinds you end
with them you don't go from that into a bat, whale, tree, or flower over
huge amounts of time.
If you wish to promote changes in life forms over millions and billions of
years, by all means you can do that, and claim evolution is how it was done.
I reject that, but accept that we can have changes within kinds that will
make a difference, but not so much to change one kind into another.
Kelly
27 Jan 14
Originally posted by KellyJay😴
You don't have a stinking clue how everything got here, because of that
if it didn't show up the way you believe it did, it could have shown up in
ANY other way. I don't claim I know how old everything is, I say I believe
or have faith, it isn't something I make factual claims about as you do.
Kelly
Same old dung heap of an argument trotted out again, change the record Kelly.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
27 Jan 14
Originally posted by KellyJayThere is no concept of "kind" in evolution theory. The closest fit might be species, wherein two animals are of different species if they cannot successfully reproduce one with the other.
I told you I believe in both Creation and evolution, and this is a factual
statement.
I'm not giving it credit for all the changes many want to give evolution
credit for. That is not disbelieving in evolution that is not agreeing with the
amount of change is possible within life forms. I accept that when you see
changes in a life form kinds like a do ...[text shortened]... thin kinds that will
make a difference, but not so much to change one kind into another.
Kelly
However:
"A mule is the offspring of a male donkey and a female horse. Horses and donkeys are different species, with different numbers of chromosomes. "
http://twistedsifter.com/2012/01/10-bizarre-hybrid-animals/
This is an interesting site.
27 Jan 14
Originally posted by JS357Scientist can not agree on what is a species.
There is no concept of "kind" in evolution theory. The closest fit might be species, wherein two animals are of different species if they cannot successfully reproduce one with the other.
However:
"A mule is the offspring of a male donkey and a female horse. Horses and donkeys are different species, with different numbers of chromosomes. "
http://twistedsifter.com/2012/01/10-bizarre-hybrid-animals/
This is an interesting site.
http://carlzimmer.com/articles/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1212035493
27 Jan 14
Originally posted by JS357So it isn't a perfect fit than uh, they do not line up completely.
There is no concept of "kind" in evolution theory. The closest fit might be species, wherein two animals are of different species if they cannot successfully reproduce one with the other.
However:
"A mule is the offspring of a male donkey and a female horse. Horses and donkeys are different species, with different numbers of chromosomes. "
http://twistedsifter.com/2012/01/10-bizarre-hybrid-animals/
This is an interesting site.
Kelly
28 Jan 14
1 edit
Originally posted by JS357The news media has known about this since 2005, however this is not the kind of story that gets much attention with most news media since it brings up questions for evilutionists.
I'll alert the media.
Soft Tissues Recovered from Ancient Dinosaur
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4559780
Report on NSNBC
28 Jan 14
I believe God created it all but .....6K ? I go back n forth on this but for me look at the size of the universe and the Light/travel time dilemma this shows an old universe. Even if the measurements are off by 10% there are objects way further out than 6k light years from us. If God created the heavens and earth only 6000+ years ago we should be in a 6k light year cocoon/bubble with a blazing bright night sky filled with all of the stars at 6K light years around us right? However this is not what we see is it?
Manny
PS: many YECers have become a religion unto their own