14 Jan 17
Originally posted by EladarIt does not mean that Jesus is an archangel .....It means He comes as the Main or Chief or Captain Messenger of God ....The voice of the Chief Messenger of God is indeed Jesus
With the voice of an archangel means is an archangel?
but He is not an angelic being as Hebrews for example clearly demonstrates......
Manny
14 Jan 17
Strong's Concordance
aggelos: an angel, messenger
Original Word: ἄγγελος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: aggelos
Phonetic Spelling: (ang'-el-os)
Short Definition: an angel, messenger
Definition: a messenger, generally a (supernatural) messenger from God, an angel, conveying news or behests from God to men.
15 Jan 17
Originally posted by menace71Thank you all of which fit the description of the Christ.
Strong's Concordance
aggelos: an angel, messenger
Original Word: ἄγγελος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: aggelos
Phonetic Spelling: (ang'-el-os)
Short Definition: an angel, messenger
Definition: a messenger, generally a (supernatural) messenger from God, an angel, conveying news or behests from God to men.
15 Jan 17
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieif 'a messenger of God' was ALL Christ was, then you might have a point, but it isn't, and you don't.
Thank you all of which fit the description of the Christ.
You literalists and Bible worshippers are all the same.
The Bible is only the word of God. It isn't God.
You profess to "know" the Bible (a claim I reject, since all you "know" is your twisted adaptation of the Bible, you reject and replace the parts your man-made dogma cannot accept), but you do not "know" God. Calling the Son a mere angel proves this. It's just more "reject and replace". This is the sin you are unrepentant of, and which you will have to answer for someday.
Originally posted by SuzianneNo one has claimed that's All the Christ was, you are engaging in a logically fallacious and predictable strawman argument citing values that have not been explicitly expressed and proceeding to build an argument on the basis of the values that you yourself fabricated, please give it up Snowflake,
if 'a messenger of God' was ALL Christ was, then you might have a point, but it isn't, and you don't.
You literalists and Bible worshippers are all the same.
The Bible is only the word of God. It isn't God.
You profess to "know" the Bible (a claim I reject, since all you "know" is your twisted adaptation of the Bible, you reject and replace the pa ...[text shortened]... eplace". This is the sin you are unrepentant of, and which you will have to answer for someday.
Jesus fits the description of an angel, he was a messenger of the Father, why that should be so difficult for you to accept I have no idea then again reality usually has difficulty making inroads to those who are willing to believe and perpetuate their own delusions.
But you see Snowflake I have no fear about meeting my maker. My God is not a petty vindictive judge, a perverse torturer casting people into a place of torment for all eternity because they failed to make the grade while in a state of weakness and imperfection.