Lack of accurate knowledge....

@fmf said
Do you believe that not subscribing to the doctrines of the Jehovah's Witnesses organization is "sinful"?

@fmf said
For the purposes of your assertion, does your definition of "truth or accuracy of knowledge" coincide exactly and only with the policies and doctrines of the JW organization?

@fmf said
Your OP talks about posters' "foolishness" and posters being "very spiritually inept" and having "tiny little thoughts". You obviously don't mean to apply these labels to yourself. Do you mean to apply them to ALL Christians here [and elsewhere] who are not members of the JW organization and who reject the ways in which its scriptural interpretations deviate from the vast majority of Christian denominations?

@galveston75 said
We never deviate from the truths in the Bible. It is the so called other Christian religions that have.
The bible clearly says to never worship an idol. We didn't put that scripture there, Jehovah did. But how many so called Christian religions have idols in their church?

@galveston75 said
We put the name of our God Jehovah back where it should have never been removed.

@galveston75 said
Maybe not sinful but probably a bad mistake.Time will tell, right?

@galveston75 said
The bible clearly says to never worship an idol.

@galveston75 said
No other religion I know of does. Who uses God's name? No one. That alone is beyond any other religion.

@fmf said
I will try again: Did your organization commission a customized version of the Bible during the C20th which uses the word "Jehovah" in a different way from other Bibles?

@fmf said
Do you recognize the non-JW Christians here as your fellow Christians?

@fmf said
So, in your view, it is not "sinful" to be a Catholic or an Anglican etc.?

I don't see how "time will tell".

@fmf said
Who in this community has offered Christian witness in which they condone or promote worshipping idols?

@fmf said
Here was the question: For the purposes of your assertion, does your definition of "truth or accuracy of knowledge" coincide exactly and only with the policies and doctrines of the JW organization?

For you, it seems to boil down "Who uses God's name?"

That doesn't seem very substantial seeing as you have been given a doctored version of the Bible by your organization. So, y ...[text shortened]... it [to people who do not use the JW version of the Bible] a part of you walking the Christian walk?

@galveston75

Okay, let's begin. As a Jehovah's Witness, you elevate such biblical texts as Genesis 9:4, Leviticus 17:10, and Acts 15:28-15:29 to justify why receiving blood is 'not' permitted (due to it representing life and being sacred to God). But why then do you ignore such texts as Mark 17:18:

"And these signs will accompany those who believe: In My name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands, and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not harm them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will be made well.”

If the 'same book' that tells you not to receive blood is telling you to drink poison and pick up snakes, to prove your faith, why aren't you doing so?

@galveston75 said
I believe I answered that question...