Muslim Murdered by Hindus for Allegedly Eating Beef in India

Originally posted by FMF
No one is accusing you of having covered up child sex abuse. You are being confronted with the fact you have argued publicly in favour of covering up child sex abuse in your religious organisation.

You have made a serious allegation that i have defended the covering up of child abuse ,

1. without actual evidence that there ever was a cover up and your post has been reported to the site moderators. People like you should not be allowed to slander and defame people on the basis of no evidence.

Originally posted by FMF
That you argued the merits of covering up child sex abuse on that thread I linked to is not in dispute is it? Do you dispute it?

I dispute that there was any cover up, do you understand? and you have failed to produce any evidence that there ever was. May i suggest that you produce evidence of a cover up as you have been asked to do so numerous times.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I dispute that there was any cover up, do you understand? and you have failed to produce any evidence that there ever was. May i suggest that you produce evidence of a cover up as you have been asked to do so numerous times.

My "serious allegation" is that you have argued in support of covering up of child abuse in your organization and the evidence that you did this is to be found on a thread called "Jehovah Witnesses and Sexual Abuse of Children" which saw its last post on 22 February of this year..

Originally posted by FMF
My "serious allegation" is that you have argued in support of covering up of child abuse in your organization and the evidence that you did this is to be found on a thread called "Jehovah Witnesses and Sexual Abuse of Children" which saw its last post on 22 February of this year..

where is your evidence of a cover up this is the fifth time that you have been asked. If there was no cover up can you tell us how anyone can possibly be guilty of defending something that has not happened. I suggest that you produce your evidence of a cover up now.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I dispute that there was any cover up, do you understand?

I am accusing you of arguing in favour of cover ups not that you have been involved in any cover up; do you understand?

Originally posted by FMF
I am accusing you of arguing in favour of cover ups not that you have been involved in any cover up; do you understand?

where is your evidence of a cover up, seventh time asking.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If there was no cover up can you tell us how anyone can possible be guilty of defending something that has not happened.

You defended it ~ believe it or not ~ in principle. You were completely open about it on that thread I linked to.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
where is your evidence of a cover up, seventh time asking.

You are not accused of being involved in a cover up. You are pretending not to understand what you are being confronted with.

Originally posted by FMF
You defended it ~ believe it or not ~ [b]in principle. You were completely open about it on that thread I linked to.[/b]

You have no evidence that a cover up even took place??? Thankyou. Perhaps next time before you make serious allegations about people you may actually have a shred of evidence to substantiate your claims instead of slandering and defaming them on the basis on nothing more than a spiteful ill will.

Please don't waste anymore of my time here its far too precious to spend remonstrating with people like you who make serious allegations on the basis of NO EVIDENCE.

Now where was it someone was saying that you were hiding out in Indonesia to escape the attention of the authorities for acts that its not fit to mention?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have no evidence that a cover up took place thankyou. Perhaps next time before you make serious allegations about people you may actually have a shred of evidence to substantiate your claims instead of slandering and defaming them on the basis on nothing more than a spiteful ill will. .

You have been confronted with defending, in principle, the covering up of child sex abuse in your religious organization. To substantiate my 'allegation' in full, I have offered your own arguments on "Jehovah Witnesses and Sexual Abuse of Children" [Thread 162947 earlier this year.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Now where was it someone was saying that you were hiding out in Indonesia to escape the attention of the authorities for acts that its not fit to mention?

Provide a link to the thread, by all means.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If there was no cover up can you tell us how anyone can possibly be guilty of defending something that has not happened.

Read what you wrote on that thread back in February.

-Removed-

Oh i understand it, but its simply another slimey loaded scenario which assumes guilt, that being that a cover up actually took place. As he can provide no evidence that a cover up actually took place then i cannot be guilty of defending a cover up, that is why he has been forced to resort to defending it in principle to try to circumvent the fact that he can provide no evidence that a cover up actually took place. I don't know about you but personally i have an aversion to arguing cases that are based on the assumption of guilt.

The only thing that is on target here are your lips on FMF bum. get a grip you chumcha, you are one sick sycophant.