Go back
New religions name? :)

New religions name? :)

Spirituality

s
Aficionado of Prawns

Not of this World

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
38013
Clock
05 Nov 11
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I do.
Its called schizophrenia and most of us dont have it.
No, it's called "for His good pleasure."

The bible tells us. With one lump of clay, God makes a grand pot. With the other, an ashtray.

Does the ashtray, which otherwise never would have come into existence in the first place, have reason to whine and complain?

And, if the Maker does one thing with one lump of clay and another thing with another, is the Maker to be made to feel guilty?

No. It's all for His divine pleasure.

Isn't our Father awesome?

Can I get an AMEN, brother?!

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Okay, have we then established in both our minds that there is one universe?
Not quite. We have established that you believe one more universe was created by God, than I believe is the case. To be more precise, I do not believe the universe was created by a person. So maybe if you say God is not a person, we are on the same page.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357
Not quite. We have established that you believe one more universe was created by God, than I believe is the case. To be more precise, I do not believe the universe was created by a person. So maybe if you say God is not a person, we are on the same page.
No we are not on the same page anymore. I believe God is three persons.

galveston75
Texasman

San Antonio Texas

Joined
19 Jul 08
Moves
78892
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
No we are not on the same page anymore. I believe God is three persons.
So which part did the planning, which part went and bought the parts and which part did the work?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
So which part did the planning, which part went and bought the parts and which part did the work?
I don't know what you mean by part and parts.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sumydid
No, it's called "for His good pleasure."

The bible tells us. With one lump of clay, God makes a grand pot. With the other, an ashtray.

Does the ashtray, which otherwise never would have come into existence in the first place, have reason to whine and complain?

And, if the Maker does one thing with one lump of clay and another thing with another, i ...[text shortened]... s all for His divine pleasure.

Isn't our Father awesome?

Can I get an AMEN, brother?!
AMEN and HalleluYAH !!!

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
05 Nov 11
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
I think "1st RJH's congregation of 1 and only 1"
the R J Blind school for the spiritually blind and wilfully ignorant
the R J Blind school for machine gun preachers

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the R J Blind school for the spiritually blind and wilfully ignorant
the R J Blind school for machine gun preachers
Hindsight is always more accurate than foresight.

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103371
Clock
05 Nov 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
AMEN and HalleluYAH !!!
er-YABBA-DABBA-DOOOOOOO!!!

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
No we are not on the same page anymore. I believe God is three persons.
So God is a corporation.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357
So God is a corporation.
No. God is a unity with each person having equal privileges and liabilities
as the unity of God.

googlefudge

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
No. God is a unity with each person having equal privileges and liabilities
as the unity of God.
You can't claim knowledge of something for which there is no evidence.
God is indistinguishable from non-existence and thus doesn't exist.

It is meaningless to talk about the properties of something that doesn't exist.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
You can't claim knowledge of something for which there is no evidence.
God is indistinguishable from non-existence and thus doesn't exist.

It is meaningless to talk about the properties of something that doesn't exist.
religious teachings exist irrespective of whether God exists or does not. It cannot be proven either way.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
You can't claim knowledge of something for which there is no evidence.
God is indistinguishable from non-existence and thus doesn't exist.

It is meaningless to talk about the properties of something that doesn't exist.
religious teaching exists irrespective of whether God exists, it is in fact meaningless to talk about the existence or non existence of God, for it cannot be proven one way nor another

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
05 Nov 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
No. God is a unity with each person having equal privileges and liabilities
as the unity of God.
I wonder how many people turn away from their childhood faith on the basis of this and similar doctrines.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.