Originally posted by RJHindsThe joke was not your reference to basic epistemology, ie. the knowledge, logic and reason part. The joke was that you based your truth on it. Your posts in "How can YEC's ignore ALL the data of old Earth?" thread is completely lacking exactly those three komponents. All your truth is based on ancient writings from people, who would stone you for even suggesting that the Earth is round and orbit the sun.
What do you base truth on?
Originally posted by RJHindsOK. I want to make sure this is clear to everyone ..
I base truth on reality that I determine through knowledge, logic, and reason.
Your faith is based on your belief.
Your belief is based on the "truth".
Your "truth" is based on reality.
Your reality is determined by knowledge, logic and reason?
Can you give an example of a piece of knowledge that ultimately your faith depends upon?
Originally posted by roigamSo to paraphrase you.
I would say that my own faith is based on the evidence or facts even as Abraham's faith and the demons faith was. It starts with a study of the Bible and it builds as the facts are proven out. The result is not only personal faith but faith that God cares and intends to do something about the miserable state mankind is in. The problem is that we have free wil ...[text shortened]... ievers..".
To study and build faith is an option but difficult.
It's like swimming upstream.
Your faith is based upon evidence and the bible.
Can you name just one of the many pieces of evidence your faith is based upon?
Originally posted by wolfgang59There is a mountain of evidence.
So to paraphrase you.
Your faith is based upon evidence and the bible.
Can you name just one of the many pieces of evidence your faith is based upon?
Probably the best examples are things that were foretold thousands of years ago and have occurred.
i.e. Matthew 24:7 was foretold by Jesus in the 1st century and was fulfilled in 1914 when the First World War occurred.
A second witness Luke recorded at Luke 21:11 in addition, "There will be...pestilences.." We are seeing these in our day. Ebola, SARS, MERS, heart disease, cancer, etc. just to mention a few.
These are evidence of the truthfulness of the Bible and encouragement to seriously look into other things that have been foretold.
I am an imperfect human and therefore can be wrong, but I can't lose by seeing that the reality the world is experiencing was accurately foreseen by God and recorded in the Bible. He put it there so we can turn around and receive seasons of refreshing from Him. (Acts 3:19)
Originally posted by LundosYou are lacking in knowledge, reason, and logic. That is the why you do not understand.
The joke was not your reference to basic epistemology, ie. the knowledge, logic and reason part. The joke was that you based your truth on it. Your posts in "How can YEC's ignore ALL the data of old Earth?" thread is completely lacking exactly those three komponents. All your truth is based on ancient writings from people, who would stone you for even suggesting that the Earth is round and orbit the sun.
Originally posted by wolfgang59My existence. I am not an illusion.
OK. I want to make sure this is clear to everyone ..
Your faith is based on your belief.
Your belief is based on the "truth".
Your "truth" is based on reality.
Your reality is determined by knowledge, logic and reason?
Can you give an example of a piece of knowledge that ultimately your faith depends upon?
Originally posted by roigamI don't think I believe you. If you did not know about Matthew 24:7 and its apparent connection to the First World War, would you have less faith?
i.e. Matthew 24:7 was foretold by Jesus in the 1st century and was fulfilled in 1914 when the First World War occurred.
Would you even see the connection if you lacked faith?
Would you have faith in another religion if I showed you similar prophesy in another religious book?
Originally posted by menace71Hi Manny,
And as I said others will see it different no argument there
Manny
What I notice is that some people seem desperately to need an explanation for mysteries (such as why the universe exists), whereas other people are content to leave mysteries mysterious. In Buddhism, for example, whether the universe had a beginning is undefined. It does not matter to Buddhists whether there was a beginning, and if there was whether it was due to divine creation or blind natural process. This approach appeals to me, because it allows the mind to focus on issues which are potentially solvable instead of getting mired in ontological wonder sickness. Obviously, this approach does not appeal to the sort of person for whom mysteries must be explained (if only by a Yet Bigger Mystery).
Originally posted by wolfgang59Not really. That is only part of it. But if I did not exist, I could not have faith in anything. I don't have faith in the magic of evolution as the source and cause of my existence. Even evolutionists refuse to include any source for life in a discussion of evolution. That remains a mystery to them.
So ultimately your faith is based upon your own existence.
Cogito ergo deus est.
Amazing!