08 Dec 19
@divegeester saidDo you know, if somebody told me that you earned your living by writing poetry I think would believe them.
So you admit that basically you haven’t got the first clue and your key evidence is based on some unreferenced, unproven sayings by an idiot President and his father, another President who is a proven adulterer and liar and 2 ex UK Prime Ministers one of whom is a politically disgraced pigs head-fuker and the other a one-eyed dour Scott.
Right?
On this particular occasion I love your description of this bunch of scrotes and would heartily endorse you summary of their characteristics.
However, they are higher up the political food chain than me (and I'm guessing you) and they weren't chirping about a NWO coming into focus without reason.
When questioned even Jesus said that he didn't know when the appointed time of the end would be. As the NWO appears to be integral, it's not realistic to think that I would have dates. The wrong war, or the wrong death of a leader could conceivably accelerate or decelerate it.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
08 Dec 19
1 edit
@secondson said"Trust me. You have no clue about what the "motive" of the church is."
Hey wolfe, I don't know about you, but I don't subscribe to any man's voice, especially that of those that seek to impose a form of government on me without my consent.
Do you understand that? Not without my consent.
Trust me. You have no clue about what the "motive" of the church is.
- secondson
OK, I'll take your current word for it.
But a quick meta observation of church history reveals a dubious trajectory. If absolute theocracy is not the aim, then what is the point of religion dabbling in state affairs and politics?
Shouldn't you just be living a clean, good life as witness to Christ's example rather than advocating for political means that justify your religious ends? I mean, what's the goal here?
08 Dec 19
1 edit
@medullah saidYou're more or less right. I am just indulging you in the hope that you get your initial whacking off on this topic out of your system and then perhaps start discussing more interesting things like the nature of spirituality, the source and application of morality, the role of religion in culture, psychological and anthropological stuff, the human condition etc. I've heard all this stuff you're peddling before. Feel free to blank out anything or everything I say.
As I have already said, I think that lot of this is a wind-up and that this isn't a genuine debate from your prospective.
08 Dec 19
@fmf saidI can't think why I would want to.
You're more or less right. I am just indulging you in the hope that you get your initial whacking off on this topic out of your system and then perhaps start discussing more interesting things like the nature of spirituality, the source and application of morality, the role of religion in culture, psychological and anthropological stuff, the human condition etc. I've heard all this stuff you're peddling before. Feel free to blank out anything or everything I say.
08 Dec 19
@fmf saidSimilar isn't the same.
Just about every single thing you've said on this thread so far, I've heard from Alex Jones. Your "philosophy" seems very similar to his.
I believe a number of things that both Catholic (mother) and Mormon (father) religions adhere to, but hat doesn't make me either.
You want to do something different or will we keep going round in circles?