20 May 18
Originally posted by @wolfe63What if you're wrong?
"Unbiblical"? That's a very distasteful word.
I suppose the next step is to proclaim heresy and burn the offender live at the stake.
What if God truly does exist...but the bible is wrong?
Broaden your sources.
Do your homework.
Think for yourself.
Preach less.
Act kindly.
"Broaden your sources"? That's pitiful. Statistically speaking most human atrocities are committed by unbelievers throughout history. Only those with a lopsided view of reality and that are bigoted against the truth blame the few for the guilt of the many.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @secondsonI am not responsible for what other people believe and they are entitled to their own thoughts and to present them here.
You are a coward in this forum for allowing them to deny the very character and nature of the one you say is your Lord while lambasting those who are supposed to be your brothers.
Furthermore I see NO ONE in this forum as a "brother", least of all the likes of Romans1009, dj2becker and you.
I try to post here with honesty and with principle, I couldn't care less if a bunch of self-righteous so called Christians don't like what I post.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterTypical of church Christians.
As expected. No honesty, no integrity and no principle.
I’ll be here waiting to ask you again when you find the courage of you tough guy posts.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterBrothers in Christ are those who follow Christ.
I am not responsible for what other people believe and they are entitled to their own thoughts and to present them here.
Furthermore I see NO ONE in this forum as a "brother", least of all the likes of Romans1009, dj2becker and you.
I try to post here with honesty and with principle, I couldn't care less if a bunch of self-righteous so called Christians don't like what I post.
Brothers for church goers are those who profess the same church doctrine
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterThats normal church behaviour.
Astonishing behaviour isn't it.
Astonishing that they cannot see their own self-righteousness
20 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeConsidering the entire context of the debate between dive and romans, a partial quote notwithstanding, maybe divegeester needs provoking.
""I think romans is trying to provoke..."
That will suffice. Never a truer word spoken.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterAsk him.
Is Romans1009 right to call me out as being ashamed of Christ?
Or are you afraid to?
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterNow who's being honest?
Who is the troll and who is the lying companion?
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterSo is yoking up with the troll that denies the truth about Jesus who you claim is your Lord and joining in with his hate speech and condemnation against the children of God.
Astonishing behaviour isn't it.
Pathetic.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @secondsonGhost of a Duke and I - as atheists - are "Christ deniers" (I take it, in your parlance) according to Romans1009, and I am accused by Romans1009 repeatedly of being a "troll" and a "liar", as is Ghost of a Duke.
So is yoking up with the troll that denies the truth about Jesus who you claim is your Lord and joining in with his hate speech and condemnation against the children of God.
Pathetic.
Ghost of a Duke has been accused of lying about his education and his job by Romans1009 ad nauseam. So who are you on about?
Rajk999 and ThinkOfOne are both followers of Christ albeit with different theology and doctrines from you. Neither of them are "trolls" or "liars" ~ you just disagree with them, that's all.
So who are you going on about in this extended and oddly mealy-mouthed endorsement of Romans1009? Is it Ghost of a Duke and me?
20 May 18
Originally posted by @secondsonWhat debate?? I haven't responded to A Romans1009 post for about 2 weeks or maybe more.
Considering the entire context of the debate between dive and romans, a partial quote notwithstanding, maybe divegeester needs provoking.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterIt may be more like three weeks.
What debate?? I haven't responded to A Romans1009 post for about 2 weeks or maybe more.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @fmfI see two kinds of people here...
Ghost of a Duke and I - as atheists - are "Christ deniers" (I take it, in your parlance) according to Romans1009, and I am accused by Romans1009 repeatedly of being a "troll" and a "liar", as is Ghost of a Duke.
Ghost of a Duke has been accused of lying about his education and his job by Romans1009 ad nauseam. So who are you on about?
Rajk999 and ThinkO ...[text shortened]... n this extended and oddly mealy-mouthed endorsement of Romans1009? Is it Ghost of a Duke and me?
Mature clear thinking ones
Immature muddle brained ones who constantly refer to those who disagree with them as trolls.