Go back
Proof you can’t take the bible literally

Proof you can’t take the bible literally

Spirituality

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
15 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

Still waiting for a referenced rebuttal of the content of my OP…

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
28005
Clock
15 Aug 22
2 edits

@divegeester said
Still waiting for a referenced rebuttal of the content of my OP…
Please DO hold your breath while you wait.

(But is it really your breath to hold?)

P.S. -- As Christians go, you strike me as a legalist -- which is to say a clever, arbitrary, transitory ego with verbal skills who prefers to engage in verbal battles it expects to win by dint of its cleverness rather than to humble and thereby exceed itself to explore the more experiential mysteries and greater contexts of Christianity.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevin-eleven said
As Christians go, you strike me as a legalist
As gays go, you strike me as being lonely.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevin-eleven said
@divegeester
Your model, your proof, and who knows what else are incomplete.
On what specifically are you basing your assertion?

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
163070
Clock
16 Aug 22

@divegeester said
It’s on my OP kellyjay, the one you keep dodging.
What am I dodging? You wrote the title of the OP, didn't you? The things you
brought up are from the Bible? What is it you think I'm dodging? Maybe you
didn't write out what you are on about!? Is it the Bible or some people you
find in error?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
What am I dodging? You wrote the title of the OP, didn't you? The things you
brought up are from the Bible? What is it you think I'm dodging? Maybe you
didn't write out what you are on about!? Is it the Bible or some people you
find in error?
Recently I’ve had many exchanges across many threads with KellyJay about this topic. But here in this OP is absolute proof that bible cannot be taken literally.

Because if one believes KellyJay’s, sonship’s and Jospehw’s version of “literal” then this is what you get…

Assertion 1)
Jesus saves the few, not the many

Evidence 1) Matt 7:14
“Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.”

Assertion 2)
God himself allows and even directs Satan to cause the many to turn away from God and perish.

Evidence 2) 2 Thessalonians 2:11
“Therefore God sends upon them a misleading influence, a working of error and a strong delusion to make them believe what is false”

Assertion 3)
Those who don’t find the “way which leadeth unto life”, becuase they have been under this influence I.e. by default the many, the billions, are burnt alive in hell for eternity by the Jesus

Evidence 3) Revelation 14:9–11
“If anyone worships the beast . . . he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever”

… a cruel God who is a failure.

So what’s the alternative?
Well there is one. It’s an alternative where Jesus is loving, full of graciousness, kind to sinners and doesn’t torture billions of people for eternity!

BUT in order to find that alternative, one first has to acknowledge that taking the bible literally at face value doesn’t work.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
163070
Clock
16 Aug 22

@divegeester said
Recently I’ve had many exchanges across many threads with KellyJay about this topic. But here in this OP is absolute proof that bible cannot be taken literally.

Because if one believes KellyJay’s, sonship’s and Jospehw’s version of “literal” then this is what you get…

Assertion 1)
Jesus saves the few, not the many

Evidence 1) Matt 7:14
“Because strait i ...[text shortened]... native, one first has to acknowledge that taking the bible literally at face value doesn’t work.
Who you talking to?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Who you talking to?
Is this primary school banter the best you can come up with?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
16 Aug 22

@kellyjay said
Who you talking to?
Absolutely bizarre.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
163070
Clock
16 Aug 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
Is this primary school banter the best you can come up with?
Well, we were talking, then you start going on as if you were talking to someone
else, and I might add, not addressing the points about your OP. "Proof you can't
take the bible literally" because you are not talking about the Bible's truthfulness
you seem to have more to say about me in this exchange. Had I never been born,
the truthfulness of the Bible would be what it is due to the things said it is; it
would still not have anything to do with me. So this is NOT about the Bible, as
you put down in the title? The quotes you put in the OP themselves are not really
anything to do with the Bible either; they have more to do with posters whose
points you disagree with, am I correct?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Well, we were talking, then you start going on as if you were talking to someone
else, and I might add, not addressing the points about your OP. "Proof you can't
take the bible literally" because you are not talking about the Bible's truthfulness
you seem to have more to say about me in this exchange. Had I never been born,
the truthfulness of the Bible would be what it ...[text shortened]... h the Bible either; they have more to do with posters whose
points you disagree with, am I correct?
My OP, which I’ve repeated for you at least twice as you seem to be having difficulty comprehending it, is fully backed up with scriptures. As soon as you feel able to provide a similarly referenced direct rebuttal to it, please feel free to do so.

Of you can carry on being silly of course.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
163070
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
My OP, which I’ve repeated for you at least twice as you seem to be having difficulty comprehending it, is fully backed up with scriptures. As soon as you feel able to provide a similarly referenced direct rebuttal to it, please feel free to do so.

Of you can carry on being silly of course.
Referenced directed at refuting what, the Bible or my views, please pick, your
title and your intent don't seem to be directed towards the same thing. Yes, my
comprehending your meaning is difficult when you are all over the place in what
you are asking, then you just out of the blue act as if you are talking to someone
else, please be plain in your intent, and ask specific questions about a specific
end, if you cannot be clear, no one will answer you correctly when you are all
over the place.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
Referenced directed at refuting what, the Bible or my views, please pick, your
title and your intent don't seem to be directed towards the same thing. Yes, my
comprehending your meaning is difficult when you are all over the place in what
you are asking, then you just out of the blue act as if you are talking to someone
else, please be plain in your intent, and ask speci ...[text shortened]... fic
end, if you cannot be clear, no one will answer you correctly when you are all
over the place.
I’m not asking you anything KellyJay. You’ve been replying to my OP and to my subsequent replies to you… which I’m here again replying to. If you don’t feel that you can offer a referenced rebuttal to my scripturally referenced OP then just don’t. It’s fine with me. But this low grade banter from you is just making you look silly.

Here it is again… IF you want to address it. It’s up to you.

Recently I’ve had many exchanges across many threads with KellyJay about this topic. But here in this OP is absolute proof that bible cannot be taken literally.

Because if one believes KellyJay’s, sonship’s and Jospehw’s version of “literal” then this is what you get…

Assertion 1)
Jesus saves the few, not the many

Evidence 1) Matt 7:14
“Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.”

Assertion 2)
God himself allows and even directs Satan to cause the many to turn away from God and perish.

Evidence 2) 2 Thessalonians 2:11
“Therefore God sends upon them a misleading influence, a working of error and a strong delusion to make them believe what is false”

Assertion 3)
Those who don’t find the “way which leadeth unto life”, becuase they have been under this influence I.e. by default the many, the billions, are burnt alive in hell for eternity by the Jesus

Evidence 3) Revelation 14:9–11
“If anyone worships the beast . . . he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever”

… a cruel God who is a failure.

So what’s the alternative?
Well there is one. It’s an alternative where Jesus is loving, full of graciousness, kind to sinners and doesn’t torture billions of people for eternity!

BUT in order to find that alternative, one first has to acknowledge that taking the bible literally at face value doesn’t work.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
163070
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
I’m not asking you anything KellyJay. You’ve been replying to my OP and to my subsequent replies to you… which I’m here again replying to. If you don’t feel that you can offer a referenced rebuttal to my scripturally referenced OP then just don’t. It’s fine with me. But this low grade banter from you is just making you look silly.

Here it is again… IF you want to add ...[text shortened]... ve, one first has to acknowledge that taking the bible literally at face value doesn’t work.[/i][/b]
So because of our exchanges you don’t think the Bible can be trusted?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
122153
Clock
16 Aug 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
So because of our exchanges you don’t think the Bible can be trusted?
No, that’s not what I’m saying at all.

Throughout this thread seem to be wanting to post anything which makes you feel as though you are addressing my scripturally referenced OP without actually addressing it.

It’s bizarre behaviour KellyJay.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.