15 May 07
Originally posted by RolfeyGod tipped the earth over and took a sip.
where did all the water go, you know, after the flood? bearing in mind the oceans were already there and all land was covered (so mount everest) there would have been just under 9000 kilometres of water completely around the world....
And you thought this was a hard question!
16 May 07
Originally posted by blakbuzzrdNot to God! Our whole planet is smaller than a zit on his nose.
I'm sorry, but 9000 whatever-the-units-are of water is way more than a sip, pal.
Let's call a swig a swig.
[Damn, sometimes I miss being a theist. I could have so much more fun with the arguments on this side of the fence...]
17 May 07
Originally posted by RBHILLAs noted by Nemesio there is always evidence for anything but whether that evidence is meaningful or not is another matter. Your 'evidence' is indistinguishable from a scientific viewpoint from evidence of local flooding. Since we know that local flooding does occur we can be sure that at least some of your 'evidence' is actually not valid evidence. So to determine whether your evidence is even partially admissible one would need to do some further analysis like identify how frequent local flooding is or determine the dates of the fossils in question. But since you do not accept the validity of any dating methods that would be impossible.
Answer: False. All around the world, in rock layer after rock layer, we find billions of dead things that have been buried in mud and sand carried by water. Their state of preservation frequently tells of rapid burial and fossilization, just like one would expect in such a flood. preservation of animal tracks, ripple marks, and even raindrop marks, testifies to rapid covering of these features to enable their preservation. [The Answers Book, Ken Ham]
Add to that the fact that your evidence comes from an unreliable source.
17 May 07
Originally posted by bob7What are "transitional periods" and what do you mean by "showing up"? Or are you just parroting what your pastor told you in the hope of looking intelligent? Please remember that parrots, even the ones who can say hundreds of words still look and sound like dumb birds.
Then why are there no transitional periods showing up?
20 May 07
Originally posted by twhiteheadBy transitional period, i mean, animals that look halfawy between monkey and man. not the ones that were frauds...
What are "transitional periods" and what do you mean by "showing up"? Or are you just parroting what your pastor told you in the hope of looking intelligent? Please remember that parrots, even the ones who can say hundreds of words still look and sound like dumb birds.
04 Aug 09
2 edits
Originally posted by RBHILLLaughing, like you might do when you think of Kirk Cameron's partner Ray Comfort's name.
51. What function of the body uses seventeen muscles, is unique to human beings in that it usually portrays the emotion of pleasure, and is often contagious?
Ray Comfort. LOL.