11 Mar 05
Originally posted by Darfiussilly man. besides having said I answered my question, what you thought was my question wasn't it.
How could God be both within the universe and claim to have made it? Looks like you answered your own premisely impossible question, yes. Great job.
I asked only if god was flat . did not make any request for the location. and it's not my problem if you cannot understand a simple premise like the degree of flatness.
11 Mar 05
Originally posted by AThousandYoungBig Colliding Brane Theory or Ekpyrotic theory is the forefront of cosmology presently, Superstrings ya know.
Possibly a Big Crunch. Possibly the singularity from which the Bang originated existed forever.
If you think God caused the BB, what caused God?
We know the Universe was still expanding 8 billion years ago. we really cant know if it still is.
11 Mar 05
Originally posted by frogstompAre you under the influence of something? Go back and reveiw your question and answer.
silly man. besides having said I answered my question, what you thought was my question wasn't it.
I asked only if god was flat . did not make any request for the location. and it's not my problem if you cannot understand a simple premise like the degree of flatness.
12 Mar 05
Originally posted by DarfiusREVIEW THIS :
Are you under the influence of something? Go back and reveiw your question and answer.
the universe is pretty flat . though it's more curved than god would have to be.
God would have to be perfectly flat,, looks like I answered my own question. thanks anyways guys.
the question was " Is god flat? "
admit your lack of understanding , you silly man.
12 Mar 05
3 edits
Originally posted by DarfiusIt all starts with the inadequacy of the prefered inflation model. So we are trying relativistic quantum gravity which of course has trouble with the dilaton field.
Elaborate on these and help royal.
As you know that a massless field coupling to gravity solely through its kinetic energy would be an anti-inflation influence.
the Calubi-Yau space of a Horava-Witten M-theory world ( not a cosmological model but a demonstration of superstring theory) is a forerunner to superstring Brane theories
the lastest is giant brane collision or Ekpyrotic theory. better known as the BIG SPLATT
and its postulation of a third brane.. loose between the two bounding branes of our 4th dimensional Universe,
does that clear it up for you and RC ?
my typos as getting worse
12 Mar 05
2 edits
btw
since : when incoming and outgoing states are infinitely separated in time, they behave as free noninteracting states.
not only does that give a problem to string and particle theories it gives major problems to any first cause creation theory
infact it gives serious event horizon problems to the premise that something outside our universe could create anything in it ,, as well as see here and perish too does the idea it ever got here,
12 Mar 05
Originally posted by frogstompGibberish
REVIEW THIS :
the universe is pretty flat . though it's more curved than god would have to be.
God would have to be perfectly flat,, looks like I answered my own question. thanks anyways guys.
the question was " Is god flat? "
admit your lack of understanding , you silly man.
12 Mar 05
Originally posted by frogstompMore gibberish. What's the difference between extra universes and God? Actually, God makes a helluva lot more sense.
It all starts with the inadequacy of the prefered inflation model. So we are trying relativistic quantum gravity which of course has trouble with the dilaton field.
As you know that a massless field coupling to gravity solely through its kinetic energy would be an anti-inflation influence.
the Calubi-Yau spac ...[text shortened]... verse,
does that clear it up for you and RC ?
my typos as getting worse
12 Mar 05
Originally posted by frogstompPlease someone tell me frog isn't constraining God with the laws of physics that God created.
btw
since : when incoming and outgoing states are infinitely separated in time, they behave as free noninteracting states.
not only does that give a problem to string and particle theories it gives major problems to any first cause creation theory
infact it gives serious event horizon problems to the premise ...[text shortened]... ing in it ,, as well as see here and perish too does the idea it ever got here,
12 Mar 05
Originally posted by DarfiusTranslation: I can't argue this point because I don't understand it,
Gibberish...
and
Originally posted by Darfius
More gibberish. What's the difference between extra universes and God? Actually, God makes a helluva lot more sense.
so I will cast this argument from the thread and my mind with a
wave of my hand and a dismissive and superior tone in my post.
Nemesio
12 Mar 05
Originally posted by DarfiusI don't. I don't believe anything except that I don't have enough information to make a good guess.
So it's not faith to believe the singularity existed forever?
If one did believe that the singularity existed forever without much evidence, then yes, it would be faith.