Go back
So, You Don't Believe In Sasquatch

So, You Don't Believe In Sasquatch

Spirituality

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
26 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
Tons of reasons, unlike any other person in any other belief system, Jesus' life was foretold, He came, and He came for several purposes, to show us in terms we could understand what God was like. He made claims one of which He said He was going to be killed and rise from the dead, then both of these things occurred. As I heard another say last night, people who rise from th ...[text shortened]... h it should be given a lot of thought, as everything else Jesus said, not to do so wouldn't be wise.
The documents were tampered with.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
26 Apr 19

@sonship said
@moonbus

[quote] Buddhism, for example, is very gentle in this matter. Buddhism does not claim that you will suffer eternal torture if you reject Buddhism. It says that there are several paths to reach the blessed state, and that it is possible to reach the blessed state here, now, in this life. No consequences, neither a promise of good ones later nor a threat of terrible ...[text shortened]... till has this desire, this craving, is he a good spiritual leader of that nation as a Buddhist monk?
Ask him yourself.

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
26 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

The only Sasquatch's Wager that I know of has to do with blueberry muffins.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
26 Apr 19

@moonbus said
The documents were tampered with.
Hardly there were to many copies in to many places written in to many languages for tampering to not be spotted.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
26 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
Hardly there were to many copies in to many places written in to many languages for tampering to not be spotted.
The oldest complete copy dates from the 13th c. Only fragments survive from earlier times. Plenty of opportunities to redact, mistranslate, mis-copy, delete, add, etc.

caissad4
Child of the Novelty

San Antonio, Texas

Joined
08 Mar 04
Moves
618778
Clock
27 Apr 19

@sonship said
@moonbus

[quote] Buddhism, for example, is very gentle in this matter. Buddhism does not claim that you will suffer eternal torture if you reject Buddhism. It says that there are several paths to reach the blessed state, and that it is possible to reach the blessed state here, now, in this life. No consequences, neither a promise of good ones later nor a threat of terrible ...[text shortened]... till has this desire, this craving, is he a good spiritual leader of that nation as a Buddhist monk?
Oh, you silly, silly Christian cult member.
Desire is part of human existence. Food, water and much other are fundamental to our physical existence. Excess desire is the issue which creates problems.
If you look on YouTube you can find where the Dalai Lama discusses this issue.
You may live in extremes, but Buddhism is the middle road.

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
27 Apr 19

@moonbus said
Believing in is not believing that. God or Sasquatch.
Another nuance to consider is whether someone believes on Sasquatch.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
27 Apr 19

@moonbus said
The oldest complete copy dates from the 13th c. Only fragments survive from earlier times. Plenty of opportunities to redact, mistranslate, mis-copy, delete, add, etc.
You should look at the link within the thread, "Is the Bible trustworthy" at the beginning of it. You will be given much more information since It sounds like you have listen to the critics interpretation of only some the data. Try those that are on the other side of the equation and see who is more reasonable.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
27 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
You should look at the link within the thread, "Is the Bible trustworthy" at the beginning of it. You will be given much more information since It sounds like you have listen to the critics interpretation of only some the data. Try those that are on the other side of the equation and see who is more reasonable.
As a test of your knowledge of "the other side of the equation" ~ and it will do no one any harm, least of all you ~ post a link to a video clip of documentary material on this issue that you steadfastly disagree with but which, you think, makes the case well and in the most reasonable way.

divegeester
watching

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
27 Apr 19
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

divegeester
watching

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
27 Apr 19

@fmf said
As a test of your knowledge of "the other side of the equation" ~ and it will do no one any harm, least of all you ~ post a link to a video clip of documentary material on this issue that you steadfastly disagree with but which, you think, makes the case well and in the most reasonable way.
I’m reminded of a scene in one of my favourite SiFi movies, Forbidden Planet, when Dr Morbius gives Robbie the Robot a command which goes against his fundamental programming causing him to go into the robot equivalent of apoplectic shock.

Actually a sub-electrical dilemma

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
27 Apr 19

@moonbus said
The documents were tampered with.
And you know this how?

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
27 Apr 19

@dj2becker said
And you know this how?
He didn't say they were actually, he said, "Plenty of opportunities to redact, mistranslate, mis-copy, delete, add, etc."

Of course that could be said about many things, no much of an argument, just enough to form an opinion.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
27 Apr 19

@dj2becker said
And you know this how?
By examining the evidence.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
27 Apr 19
1 edit

@kellyjay said
You should look at the link within the thread, "Is the Bible trustworthy" at the beginning of it. You will be given much more information since It sounds like you have listen to the critics interpretation of only some the data. Try those that are on the other side of the equation and see who is more reasonable.
Rather than sidetracking into a discussion of whether the Bible has any more credibility than any other ancient text, let's return to the OP, shall we?

Suppose some prophet, not Jesus, claims to speak with the authority of God, and he says if you don't believe what that prophet says, his God will torture you for all eternity. And now some third prophet, also not Jesus, says much the same thing. What reason can you provide not to believe all three, just to 'cover all the bases' in case at least one of them is correct?

This thread isn't about the Bible. It's about the question whether the threat of terrible, eternal punishment for not believing something is a good reason to believe it, especially when the thing we are expected to believe absolutely defies all rational explanation and experience, for example, that a man rose from the dead. And now suppose that someone proposes some equally inexplicable thing, let's say that lizard-aliens in human-like form have invaded the Earth and demand us to worship them, and says 'if you don't believe this, you will be tortured eternally in a lake of fire.' Is it rational to believe this?!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.