Go back
So, You Don't Believe In Sasquatch

So, You Don't Believe In Sasquatch

Spirituality

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
27 Apr 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Great. Can you show me God?


Look Kelly, we are bound and severely limited by our finite nature. We will never do the math. We simply don't have all the numbers.
Would a painting not convince you of the existence of an artist?

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
27 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@dj2becker said
Which evidence could that be?
You limited manuscripts to those that were complete and gave a date suggesting that those show a hole in the validity of them. Everything else!

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
27 Apr 19
1 edit

@dj2becker said
Would a painting not convince you of the existence of an artist?
Right back at you. If you came across a painting and were not there to see the artist at work, could you ever say with certainty who the artist was? What if many artists were attributed to the work?

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
27 Apr 19

@kellyjay said
Why?
Neither of us were there at the time of creation (if there even was a creation). How could we possibly rule anything in or out with certainty?

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
27 Apr 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I believe in Sasquatch because there's a book about them that says they exist. In the preface, the editor acknowledges that unbelievers also exist, but asserts that the information provided in the book is true.

If a book says it's true, then it must be true, right?

Plus, the book contained an interview with a Sasquatch where the subject reportedly said, "What the hell kind of interview is this? Who do you think you're talking to? Yes, of course I exist. Do you?"

"Because Sasquatch said so," is good enough for me.

[Edit: But in that interview, I don't think the Sasquatch said anything about consequences of doubt. Hmm. Sorry that I strayed from that particular point.]

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
27 Apr 19

@caesar-salad said
I believe in Sasquatch because there's a book about them that says they exist. In the preface, the editor acknowledges that unbelievers also exist, but asserts that the information provided in the book is true.

If a book says it's true, then it must be true, right?

Plus, the book contained an interview with a Sasquatch where the subject reportedly said, "What the ...[text shortened]... said anything about consequences of doubt. Hmm. Sorry that I strayed from that particular point.]
That post was abominable.

😲

Kevin Eleven

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27445
Clock
27 Apr 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
That post was abominable.

😲
(Consequences yeti to be determined.)

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
27 Apr 19

@caesar-salad said
(Consequences yeti to be determined.)
Apologies sir if I put my big foot in my mouth...

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
27 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Neither of us were there at the time of creation (if there even was a creation). How could we possibly rule anything in or out with certainty?
You realize that simply saying there was a beginning you have ruled out one of the choices.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
27 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Right back at you. If you came across a painting and were not there to see the artist at work, could you ever say with certainty who the artist was? What if many artists were attributed to the work?
This still is working back from what we know, someone or some ones did it.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
27 Apr 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Neither of us were there at the time of creation (if there even was a creation). How could we possibly rule anything in or out with certainty?
Do you view evolution, and the interpretation of what the fossils show us, with this same level of scrutiny (none of us were there), or do you just believe what people tell you?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Apr 19

@dj2becker said
Would a painting not convince you of the existence of an artist?
As we all know given enough time and enough paint the Mona Lisa
could be produced by the random play of chimpanzees.

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
28 Apr 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Right back at you. If you came across a painting and were not there to see the artist at work, could you ever say with certainty who the artist was? What if many artists were attributed to the work?
Sure that’s a fair question which would require you to examine more evidence but saying there is no artist isn’t getting you closer to the truth.

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
28 Apr 19

@wolfgang59 said
As we all know given enough time and enough paint the Mona Lisa
could be produced by the random play of chimpanzees.
No we don’t all know that, that is simply your faith claim.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Apr 19

@dj2becker said
No we don’t all know that, that is simply your faith claim.
Sorry.
I should have said;
"As anyone who has given it some thought knows -
given enough time and enough paint the Mona Lisa could
be produced by the random play of chimpanzees."

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.