Spirituality
24 Mar 18
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterSo your ONE bitch with me is that I didn't take sonship to task over something he said (and which I didn't even see)? And this somehow makes my post "thick" with irony?
The irony in your post is so thick I could use it to fill pot holes.Do you even stop to consider how you allow your partisan mindset to impact your posting? For example did you tackle sonship for calling out posters who disagreed with him (including you) as claiming to be more righteous that Christ? No of course you didn’t, he’s your buddy, brethren, ...[text shortened]... orum pal, you side of the battle and the forum and website destroyers like me.
Just grow up.
Please.
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @rajk999I've told you where and why you're wrong but all you do is state your case over again (insufficiently, I might add. ToO makes the same mistake -- he debates nothing, he merely states his insufficient point again like that proves something). You could try actually reading what I write, but this is impossible for you because of some crap Paul said about women should not speak of spiritual matters?
Your problem is that what I say makes sense.
What I say is what Jesus Christ says and that bothers you.
I suggest you wake up from your blissful ignorance and smell the coffee
I think you need to step boldly into the 21st century.
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelNo, he doesn't. Supposedly, according to him, he only bases what he says on the Bible, but wait, no, that's not right either-- what he bases his posts on is his twisted interpretation of scripture, just like Eladar and RJH before him.
Rajk bases his assessment on others posts . Fair enough ?
So, please, if you don't know what you're talking about, could you please butt out and STFU?
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @suzianneYou go, girl!
I've told you where and why you're wrong but all you do is state your case over again (insufficiently, I might add. ToO makes the same mistake -- he debates nothing, he merely states his insufficient point again like that proves something). You could try actually reading what I write, but this is impossible for you because of some crap Paul said about w ...[text shortened]... should not speak of spiritual matters?
I think you need to step boldly into the 21st century.
You speak on spiritual matters all you want - don’t let “the man” hold you down. Uh- huh!
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @suzianneOh, yeah! Speak it, sister!
No, he doesn't. Supposedly, according to him, he only bases what he says on the Bible, but wait, no, that's not right either-- what he bases his posts on is his twisted interpretation of scripture, just like Eladar and RJH before him.
So, please, if you don't know what you're talking about, could you please butt out and STFU?
Originally posted by @suzianneWow. You can just outright say "bitch". And people think you don't learn anything in the Spirituality forum.
So your ONE bitch with me is that I didn't take sonship to task over something he said (and which I didn't even see)? And this somehow makes my post "thick" with irony?
Please.
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @suzianneI don’t have a “bitch” with you Suzianne, I just point out your lack of principle in your posting and how your mindset is full of paranoia and a level of imaginings which would make Tolkien blush. The stuff you come out with in here is astonishingly unbelievable at times.
So your ONE bitch with me is that I didn't take sonship to task over something he said (and which I didn't even see)? And this somehow makes my post "thick" with irony?
Please.
You attack me and others for no other reason than you don’t like us, nothing about debate or discussion, just a simple partisan playground ideology.
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @suzianneGot a comment on the OP or are you just here to swing your fists and then duck out?
So your ONE bitch with me is that I didn't take sonship to task over something he said (and which I didn't even see)? And this somehow makes my post "thick" with irony?
Please.
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @romans1009It really is very odd how you switch so effortlessly from a plethora of biblical quotes to this kind of post, that wouldn't be out of place on the Jerry Springer show.
You go, girl!
You speak on spiritual matters all you want - don’t let “the man” hold you down. Uh- huh!
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke“For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:
It really is very odd how you switch so effortlessly from a plethora of biblical quotes to this kind of post, that wouldn't be out of place on the Jerry Springer show.
But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:
That no flesh should glory in his presence.”
(1 Corinthians 1:26-29)
I be diggin’ Paul’s writing in First Corinthians, uh-huh!
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterOh, stop yer whining.
I don’t have a “bitch” with you Suzianne, I just point out your lack of principle in your posting and how your mindset is full of paranoia and a level of imaginings which would make Tolkien blush. The stuff you come out with in here is astonishingly unbelievable at times.
You attack me and others for no other reason than you don’t like us, nothing about debate or discussion, just a simple partisan playground ideology.
Suzianne be talkin’ righteous smack to you, snorkel boy!
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterGo jump in a lake, snorkel boy
Got a comment on the OP or are you just here to swing your fists and then duck out?
31 Mar 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterDoes your mind ever leave the gutter?
Put the tissues away sonny.