- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeLooking forward to the thread and page number where this something junk fellow posted the Redpath quote.
Creating multiple accounts becker is a violation of RHPs Terms of Service.
It's also extremely sad.
When you don’t care about or respect the Truth, as many atheists don’t, the “father of lies” is quite powerful.
02 Feb 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeBut no penalty for accusations, curiously.
Creating multiple accounts becker is a violation of RHPs Terms of Service.
It's also extremely sad.
Remember when a few posters herein insisted that I had donned the identity of another poster?
The other poster being female, to boot?
You can somewhat sympathize with a person who does establish a separate identity on the site.
Most are so entrenched in their respective camps as to immediately dismiss everything posted by those whom they regard as part of a different camp.
It's been shown repeatedly how a poster will receive downvotes for even innocuous content, proving others simply want to get their stone into the pit--- just to make sure it's recorded and felt.
Those donning other personas--- and I'm not commenting on this current distraction--- might be doing so simply to have a salient point or two heard, given the deaf ear reserved for those with whom we disagree.
This isn't discourse.
It's not even in the same neighborhood.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
Originally posted by @freakykbhFeel free to sympathize with someone who creates a second account and by all means convince yourself it is done to offer salient points rather than as a means of blatant deception. Either way, it's still a violation of the Terms of Service. (And a mockery of Beckers alleged Christian values).
But no penalty for accusations, curiously.
Remember when a few posters herein insisted that I had donned the identity of another poster?
The other poster being female, to boot?
You can somewhat sympathize with a person who does establish a separate identity on the site.
Most are so entrenched in their respective camps as to immediately dismi ...[text shortened]... r those with whom we disagree.
This isn't discourse.
It's not even in the same neighborhood.
(And worth noting, I said publically at the time I did not believe that second female account belonged to you).
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeSecond account? I thought this was supposed to be my third account - first Becker, then something junk and now this one. You can’t even keep your lies straight.
Feel free to sympathize with someone who creates a second account and by all means convince yourself it is done to offer salient points rather than as a means of blatant deception. Either way, it's still a violation of the Terms of Service. (And a mockery of Beckers alleged Christian values).
(And worth noting, I said publically at the time I did not believe that second female account belonged to you).
Come on; try a little harder. You’re really slipping and embarrassing yourself.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @romans1009If you really think this is a duplicate account, why not file a complaint so RHP can check IP addresses or otherwise determine if what you’re claiming is true?
Second account? I thought this was supposed to be my third account - first Becker, then something junk and now this one. You can’t even keep your lies straight.
Come on; try a little harder. You’re really slipping and embarrassing yourself.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeWhy would you give me permission for something I've already made a pronouncement on?
Feel free to sympathize with someone who creates a second account and by all means convince yourself it is done to offer salient points rather than as a means of blatant deception. Either way, it's still a violation of the Terms of Service. (And a mockery of Beckers alleged Christian values).
(And worth noting, I said publically at the time I did not believe that second female account belonged to you).
The far, far more curious and interesting thing is the default position herein, namely, people who emphatically refuse to address content, concerning themselves instead on ancillary administrative issues which have little to nothing to do with the stated intent of those same posters, i.e., to engage in discourse.
For the record, I, too, publicly claimed I wasn't her, as (I'm pretty sure) did she.
Yeah, me!
Yeah-er, her!
Why the focus on areas within the domain of the administrators, instead of addressing the topics at face value?
Makes no sense to me.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
02 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009We were talking in general terms about people who create a second account, but yes, Becker previously had an account called fetchmyjunk and publically apologized for 'deliberately deceiving' people.
Second account? I thought this was supposed to be my third account - first Becker, then something junk and now this one. You can’t even keep your lies straight.
Come on; try a little harder. You’re really slipping and embarrassing yourself.
Is your position that this is your first account here and that you coincidentally picked up from where Becker left off, posting in exactly the same manner and thread?! - It simply isn't credible that a new person to the site would enter the forums in such a manner.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThis is my first account and I have no idea who this Becker person is. I’m used to debating atheists and am well acquainted with their talking points, tactics and diversionary methods.
We were talking in general terms about people who create a second account, but yes, Becker previously had an account called fetchmyjunk and publically apologized for 'deliberately deceiving' people.
Is your position that this is your first account here and that you coincidentally picked up from where Becker left off, posting in exactly the same m ...[text shortened]... It simply isn't credible that a new person to the site would enter the forums in such a manner.
Whether you believe me or not is irrelevant to me, except it’s just an excuse, imo, to avoid debating substance.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
02 Feb 18
Originally posted by @freakykbhCreating multiple accounts makes no sense to me.
Why would you give me permission for something I've already made a pronouncement on?
The far, far more curious and interesting thing is the default position herein, namely, people who emphatically refuse to address content, concerning themselves instead on ancillary administrative issues which have little to nothing to do with the stated intent of those ...[text shortened]... in of the administrators, instead of addressing the topics at face value?
Makes no sense to me.
I do though find it rather odd that when we have these characters (from time to time) who try to deceive people with second accounts, it is Christians like yourself and sonship (who shrugged his shoulders I recall when Becker admitted his deception last time) who apparently have no qualms about a fellow Christian being deceptive. Do you not think this reflects rather poorly on the Christian faith you project here. What message do you think that sends out to non-believers? (Seriously).
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
<And a mockery of Beckers alleged Christian values).>
If I’m supposed to be Becker, why would I mock my own values? Are you even trying to make sense?
Maybe you’re used to the targets of your false accusations and abuse staying still and quiet and just taking it. Sorry, honey, I fight back
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou’re still falsely claimingI’m someone else. And you’re doing it because you can’t debate substance.
Creating multiple accounts makes no sense to me.
I do though find it rather odd that when we have these characters (from time to time) who try to deceive people with second accounts, it is Christians like yourself and sonship (who shrugged his shoulders I recall when Becker admitted his deception last time) who apparently have no qualms about a f ...[text shortened]... faith you project here. What message do you think that sends out to non-believers? (Seriously).
Like I said earlier, if you really believe I’m Becker and something junk, file a complaint. Otherwise, you’re becoming a broken record and a bore.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
Originally posted by @romans1009Again you have misunderstood what was said.
<And a mockery of Beckers alleged Christian values).>
If I’m supposed to be Becker, why would I mock my own values? Are you even trying to make sense?
Maybe you’re used to the targets of your false accusations and abuse staying still and quiet and just taking it. Sorry, honey, I fight back
I did not say he 'mocked' himself, but made a mockery of his professed Christian values by deliberately deceiving people. (You see the difference right? )
As a Christian, do you 'romans1009' think it okay for a Christian to deliberately deceive people? (A link to the 10 Commandments is pending).
Edit: You say you want to debate something with substance. Kindly demonstrate.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeHow am I deceiving people? You’re still hung up on your false accusation that I’m someone else? You’re a troll and not even an entertaining one.
Again you have misunderstood what was said.
I did not say he 'mocked' himself, but made a mockery of his professed Christian values by deliberately deceiving people. (You see the difference right? )
As a Christian, do you 'romans1009' think it okay for a Christian to deliberately deceive people? (A link to the 10 Commandments is pending).
Edit: You say you want to debate something with substance. Kindly demonstrate.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
Originally posted by @romans1009That wasn't the question. I asked you (romans1009) clearly:
How am I deceiving people? You’re still hung up on your false accusation that I’m someone else? You’re a troll and not even an entertaining one.
'As a Christian, do you 'romans1009' think it okay for a Christian to deliberately deceive people? (A link to the 10 Commandments is pending). '
This was your opportunity to distance yourself from Becker, not associate yourself with him.