Spirituality
21 Oct 14
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by Great King RatForbidden Science - Shattering the Myths of Darwin's Theory of Evolution
The claims made in that video have long since been debunked by Dr. Aitken Stock and colleagues. But don’t ever watch it, it might change your mind and you wouldn’t want that to happen.
Idiot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsYou must be getting desperate, you have posted these truly stupid video's at least twice now. You really need to keep up with your Alzheimer's meds.
Forbidden Science - Shattering the Myths of Darwin's Theory of Evolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wr-lXLGCxQ
22 Oct 14
Originally posted by shavixmirThe evidence that Darwin had expected to validate his theory has not been found. In fact, all the new information being discovered by scientists show that Darwin's theory of evolution could not have happened the way he had believed. Evolutionists continue to modify his theory so it covers less and less in an attempt to keep it alive. It is sort of like "life support" for the brain dead.
I can't click on the links. Well, I can, but ain't nothin' gonna happen.
Care to sum up what the argument is that Darwinism is dead?
- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
23 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat evidence and modifications to the theory exactly are you talking about?
The evidence that Darwin had expected to validate his theory has not been found. In fact, all the new information being discovered by scientists show that Darwin's theory of evolution could not have happened the way he had believed. Evolutionists continue to modify his theory so it covers less and less in an attempt to keep it alive. It is sort of like "life support" for the brain dead.
23 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd you would know brain dead better than most.
The evidence that Darwin had expected to validate his theory has not been found. In fact, all the new information being discovered by scientists show that Darwin's theory of evolution could not have happened the way he had believed. Evolutionists continue to modify his theory so it covers less and less in an attempt to keep it alive. It is sort of like "life support" for the brain dead.
23 Oct 14
1 edit
Originally posted by C HessI am not going to go into details, but briefly, the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates to the evolution of man from the ape has all been modified in some way over time. Because of the Law of Biogenesis, most evolutionists don't even consider the origin of life or species as part of the evolution theory anymore. The discovery of the sudden appearance of vertebrates of different kinds has caused a need to modify the original theory. Richard Dawkins has admitted that man did not descend from any modern ape we know of today.
What evidence and modifications to the theory exactly are you talking about?
23 Oct 14
Originally posted by RJHindsGee, who would have known man did not evolve from apes. WOW, SUCH a revelation.
I am not going to go into details, but briefly, the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates to the evolution of man from the ape has all been modified in some way over time. Because of the Law of Biogenesis, most evolutionists don't even consider the origin of life or species as part of the evolution theory anymore ...[text shortened]... ory. Richard Dawkins has admitted that man did not descend from any modern ape we know of today.
Have you ever considered just how we could have evolved from apes SINCE WE ARE BOTH SPECIES HERE ON EARTH AT THE SAME TIME?
BOTH man and apes evolved from some hominid form even more primitive way back in the past so stop using that asssinine argument already.